Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Just for you, Grumpf |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 8> |
Author | |
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 01 Apr 09 at 8:50pm |
FrankenBlaze thingy. Also available in red. |
|
![]() |
|
G.R.F. ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 10 Aug 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 4028 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nice but...
I'd like a flared 'chisel' deck with some volume to stop nose dives and provide platform for me to swivel my pole in light weather when I can't make downwind 'angle' speeds. Either a stepped hull (since we're in dvelopment territory here) or a chine design I shall have to give you, borrowed from a revolutionary in its day powerboat I once raced in the seventies, it was 15% more efficient by sweeping the chine ends in which provided a step of sorts and reduced the wetted area the faster it went. Proved a bit to efficient for the engine we had back then, but that's another story, i reckon sail power would work really well, it also self levelled. Anyone reading this may recall the Bo Oldenburg design it featured on Tomorrows world in 1975, we built one in Kevlar (First boat ever built anywhere in the world in the damn stuff, blunted five diamond cutters and fell in half the first wave we took because the kevlar weave supplied by Dupont was so watertight it didn't accept the resin, you can thank me for Kevlar S Glass and the other variations that were to come later.) Thanks for that peaky, nice looker, but wouldn't suit our water, that's what i like about the Blaze hull, it'll take a good sea, you can see that just by looking at it, it also has a potentially really fast parabolic rocker which would release well if the nose got a good kite lifting it I reckon.. Edited by G.R.F. |
|
![]() |
|
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You really ought to go for the Blaze option. It is a good platform to try a kite on, and the photo's of the one with the black kite look very fun. If it all fails, the Blaze is a very fine boat in its normal state.
|
|
![]() |
|
G.R.F. ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 10 Aug 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 4028 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes that's my current thinking as well, but there may be other alternatives in
the near future and there was just one other avenue I haven't explored yet based on the Solution. I haven't spoken to them yet but I'd reasoned it might be worth posing the question as soon as my busy period finishes which should be by close of business today. |
|
![]() |
|
m_liddell ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 27 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 583 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
FFA |
|
![]() |
|
alstorer ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You've claimed to have sailed an Iso, haven't you? Blaze's hull shape is pretty much that, but smaller. Close enough to get a feel for what you reckon, I'd have thought? |
|
-_
Al |
|
![]() |
|
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The board looks a long way forward to me. Is this correct? How does that work? Big (balanced) rudder contributing to CLR? Nice looking boat though. It's interesting to consider whether to go for a singlehander with a kite and no wire, as a route to kite and wire. Is this a better route than wire first? I expect it varies with where you sail and in how much wind, and who you want to race. I'm currently bimbling with an old RS600. |
|
![]() |
|
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks. To be honest, it is just placed by eye in these drawings - I only spent about an hour knocking it up. I will do some more proper design on it over the weekend, and see where the board ends up then. I think there is a large number of people who don't want to trapeze helm at all - either because it is a skill too far, or the water is too restricted, because they like the pain of hiking. |
|
![]() |
|
G.R.F. ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 10 Aug 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 4028 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What I want to do is go to a single hander with both options.
I.E has the rack to operate with, but offers the option of entry level wiring but without the absolute necessity to wire inorder to survive round a course. To me a wire I consider like a harness, use it or not but it's a comfort option rather than a necessity for the thing to function. So I'd like to be able to get round courses without having to have it, but if the need arose and I got fed up with all that stomach aching hiking bollox, I just clip in and get a bit of support, maybe hike out a bit further off the rack. Now, what is so wrong with that? Why has it got to be either or? A higly marketable product I would have thought, it could be used inland or on the sea, introduce folk to harnesses if they want, but not an absolute necessity. Edited by G.R.F. |
|
![]() |
|
G.R.F. ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 10 Aug 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 4028 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I assumed that was to do with the fact it swings back and if the start point is too far back the tip inteferes with the rudder when it's pivoted back. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 8> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |