Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Pursuit Race Start Times |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <123> |
Author | |||
Isis ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 Sep 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2753 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 05 Jan 06 at 2:43pm |
||
But surely this will be more acurate than rounding to the nearest minute? |
|||
![]() |
|||
Matt Jackson ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Sep 04 Location: Darlington Online Status: Offline Posts: 962 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
... and certainly will be fairly accurate over the duarion of the start sequence if not the whole race day.
|
|||
Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
|||
![]() |
|||
redders ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 30 Dec 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 41 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
At my club we have 2 systems. The first is a computer system as per Aldridge that is used in the same way for handicap races, and can be used for pursuits. The second is a control unit ( PLC ) from a conveyor system that is used just for pusuit races. The PLC does seem to be the more accurate. Back to the original question...... Rounding times means that as a percentage of the total time sailed the faster boats may be heavier penalised given the amount of the rounding, but in the greater scheme of things does it really matter. I am not convinced that pursuit racing is all that fair on the fast boats anyway. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Matt Jackson ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Sep 04 Location: Darlington Online Status: Offline Posts: 962 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
But unless you have LOTS of classes I don't see the need for rounding. We only have one hoot for each start and you are expected to use your own watch to give you the preparatory etc. It's just someone sitting in a box pressing a button when the clock reads the same number as what's on a sheet. If anything it's easier (on the day) than a normal 3 handicap class start. I alway thought the tricky bit was the finish - especially for those on an upwind leg. |
|||
Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Garry ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 18 Apr 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 536 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I totally agree pursuit races are much easier to start if you've done your prepartion. Finishing is much more of an issue. However if you motor dead down wind from the windward mark you can get a pretty good idea of the finishing order.
|
|||
Garry
Lark 2252, Contender 298 www.cuckoos.eclipse.co.uk |
|||
![]() |
|||
Phat Bouy ![]() Posting king ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 Jun 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 168 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
To clarify a little more, what constitues a second on a PC clock is rarely the same each time. Machines now run a rate of several Giggle Hurts (big numbers) ie calculations per second (small number). If the processor runs at a frequency that is a harmonic of mains power then other discrepancies can kick in. Not withstanding that, the inbuilt maths co-processor also has errors (just gotta lurve computers...) get the sq root of 2 (1.4142 ....) then square it, answer = 1.99999... Gotta stop now, terrible whiff of sandals ![]() |
|||
Je suis Marxiste - tendance Groucho
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Garry ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 18 Apr 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 536 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Firstly on averge over the 2 - 3 hours a PC clock will be running it will not be that inaccurate. At any specific time there may be greater inaccuracies because of interrupts/disk activities etc but this is still probably less than human inaccuracies with a stop watch provided the PC is just carrying out the timing task. There are also some fairly simple ways to improve timing accuracy if you wish.
Secondly if my memory is correct the square root of 2 is irrational and therefore you will get rounding errors in this type of calculation when done on a PC. Although many applications can handle something this simple (ie Excel, MS's Calculator) If you want to carryout accurate maths on a PC with lots of significant digits you need to be more sophisticated and use specially written modules to overcome the limits of the internal PC architecture. Really you're nit picking who cares about 0.2 seconds compared to errors of 20 or 30 seconds and who's worried about an error of 0.00000000001% in the calculations (this is smaller than rounding errors on pocket calculators caused by having only 8 or 12 digits in the display. Any half decent real-time programmer could write you something that was indistinguishable from the human with stop watch and fog horn. PCs have been doing data aquisition at KHz for years 1/1000 second and I expect they are now capable of MHz 1/1,000,000 second. Garry - Ex control and instrumentation engineer. Edited by Garry |
|||
Garry
Lark 2252, Contender 298 www.cuckoos.eclipse.co.uk |
|||
![]() |
|||
Phat Bouy ![]() Posting king ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 Jun 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 168 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
and if you can't take a joke, you shouldn't use m1cro$oft
![]() ![]() |
|||
Je suis Marxiste - tendance Groucho
|
|||
![]() |
|||
ColH ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 11 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 242 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Out of interest, anyone know of commercially-available systems along those lines? Col |
|||
![]() |
|||
redback ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Mar 04 Location: Tunbridge Wells Online Status: Offline Posts: 1502 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |