New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: General Recall & redress
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

General Recall & redress
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
  Share Topic Share Topic  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Ralph T View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 20 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 36 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Ralph T Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: General Recall & redress
    Posted: 10 Nov 05 at 4:40pm

Originally posted by Scooby_simon

what flags/markers went up.  Sound signals are only to bring your attention.  IMO If the correct flags went up (for boat(s) over) the CTTe are in the clear.

For future reference, the absence of sound signals etc only applies to the start sequence (rule 26). Once the staring signal has been given, rule 26 has finished.

Rule 29 is very clear in that there must be flags AND sound signals. I cannot remember the Case number which covers this aspect but redress should certainly be given if the race committee give the wrong signals or none at all.

Won't attempt to say what redress should be given, only to point out that A10 is 'guidance' and refers to 'advised to consider'. In my book, that means that there  is an unwritten A10(c) - Common Sense!
Back to Top
gordon View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 07 Sep 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1037 		Post Options Post Options   Quote gordon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Nov 05 at 3:11pm

As far as I know you cannot wait until the end of the series to see if your final result is affected by the protest committees decsion. i'll have to check if there is anything in the case book, but I know the example came up at a Race Management seminar once. At present your place has been made significantly worse by the protest committee's decision. You can appeal, or make a new request for redress - as long as time limits have not expired!

Gordon

 
Gordon
Back to Top
Garry View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 536 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Garry Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 5:04pm
Originally posted by Stefan Lloyd

James, I wasn't trying to argue that you weren't disadvantaged.


You might or might not remember that a couple of years ago I successfully protested the HWS committee. They asked me what redress I wanted and fortunately I had already thought about and had an argument to make, which they accepted. The point I was trying to make is that, while of course it is the judge's decision what redress you get, you are more likely to walk away happy if you have thought in advance about specifically want you want; preferably something that isn't going to upset the rest of the competitors. I've witnessed some other similar protests against the race committee and judges seem very reluctant to throw races out even if the race officer has got it wrong somehow. They are looking for a solution that allows the race to remain valid and leave everyone at least moderately happy that justice was done.


My experience has also been that, A10 quoted above nothwithstanding, judges can be quite flexible in the redress they give.


By the way I had a strong incentive to win that protest, since my crew had told me that if I didn't, I was going for a swim next weekend.


Good luck in the rest of the series.


 



Stefan - just a small point but you don't protest the race committee you request redress (although you may use the protest form to do it)
Garry

Lark 2252, Contender 298

www.cuckoos.eclipse.co.uk
Back to Top
jdhayward View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 31 Oct 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5 		Post Options Post Options   Quote jdhayward Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 2:55pm
An appeal to the RYA to clarify the position would certainly be interesting though we'll have to wait until December and the end of the series to see whether our placing is lowered - I'm hoping that the end result will be better but it still leaves a potential anomaly in the current rules.
Back to Top
Presuming Ed View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 641 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Presuming Ed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 12:41pm

Originally posted by jdhayward

I was trying to debate this on a broader level (am not trying to get hung up on the details of our particular incident) - whilst A10 is the rule that currently outlines the redress procedure don't you think that it should also state that in any event the position given to the appealing boat should in any event be no worse that what was scored on the water?
 The huge advantage of average points is that it's easy - which is why it's so often used. If you look at 64.2, though, the protest committee are actually allowed to award pretty much anything. Not sure what I would do in your position - if you're in time you could appeal, which would actually be very interesting - based on
62.1 A request for redress or a protest committee’s decision to consider redress shall be based on a claim or possibility that a boat’s score in a race or series has, through no fault of her own, been made signifcantly worse by(a) an improper action or omission of the race committee, protest committee or organizing authority...
 Your score has been made worse by the actions of the protest committee. Given that an appeal an the easy way to get the RYA to look at it, I really would be very interesting if you went ahead. Who knows, you might get the rules changed!
 
Back to Top
Stefan Lloyd View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 03 Aug 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1599 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Stefan Lloyd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 12:02pm

James, I wasn't trying to argue that you weren't disadvantaged.

You might or might not remember that a couple of years ago I successfully protested the HWS committee. They asked me what redress I wanted and fortunately I had already thought about and had an argument to make, which they accepted. The point I was trying to make is that, while of course it is the judge's decision what redress you get, you are more likely to walk away happy if you have thought in advance about specifically want you want; preferably something that isn't going to upset the rest of the competitors. I've witnessed some other similar protests against the race committee and judges seem very reluctant to throw races out even if the race officer has got it wrong somehow. They are looking for a solution that allows the race to remain valid and leave everyone at least moderately happy that justice was done.

My experience has also been that, A10 quoted above nothwithstanding, judges can be quite flexible in the redress they give.

By the way I had a strong incentive to win that protest, since my crew had told me that if I didn't, I was going for a swim next weekend.

Good luck in the rest of the series.

 
Back to Top
jdhayward View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 31 Oct 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5 		Post Options Post Options   Quote jdhayward Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 11:34am
I was trying to debate this on a broader level (am not trying to get hung up on the details of our particular incident) - whilst A10 is the rule that currently outlines the redress procedure don't you think that it should also state that in any event the position given to the appealing boat should in any event be no worse that what was scored on the water?

Also, I realise the current rules don't allow it but what is wrong with the concept of awarding someone a time allowance ie. 5% - its arbitrary but no more so that the concept of a 5 or 10% penalty that is currently in force? Thoughts...
Back to Top
Presuming Ed View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 641 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Presuming Ed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 10:58am

Well, if we look at the actual rules involved:

64.2 Decisions on Redress

When the protest committee decides that a boat is entitled to redress under rule 62, it shall make as fair an arrangement as possible for all boats affected, whether or not they asked for redress. This may be to adjust the scoring (see rule A10 for some examples) or finishing times of boats, to abandon the race, to let the results stand or to make some other arrangement. When in doubt about the facts or probable results of any arrangement for the race or series, especially before abandoning the race, the protest committee shall take evidence from appropriate sources.

And

A10 Guidance on Redress

If the protest committee decides to give redress by adjusting a boat’s score for a race, it is advised to consider scoring her

(a) points equal to the average, to the nearest tenth of a point (0.05 to be rounded upward), of her points in all the races in the series except the race in question;

(b) points equal to the average, to the nearest tenth of a point (0.05 to be rounded upward), of her points in all the races before the race in question; or

(c) points based on the position of the boat in the race at the time of the incident that justifed redress.

It's going to take quite something to get a protest committee to ignore A10 and go for something other than average points in this situation. I think that in all situations where I've been sitting on a protest committee, and we've awarded redress, we've gone for average points. The difficulty with the third option, -based on your position at the time of the incident- is that it's very hard to tell what that position is just after the start - normally, you would take positions from the last mark rounded. Without that sort of information, it's almost impossible to come up with a sensible number. To say "we had a cracking start, and would have done very well in that race" is all very well, but is a bit speculative...

(P.S - HATE this forum software. Anybody know why it's gone bold -it's not the bold button - and what I can do to change it?)



Edited by Presuming Ed
Back to Top
jdhayward View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 31 Oct 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5 		Post Options Post Options   Quote jdhayward Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 9:31am
Stefan - firstly the redress was simple - we were right on the front of the grid, clear air etc. and as a direct result of the committee we ended up at the back and were clearly disadvantaged which they recognised so we asked for time allowance.

Secondly, as a result of this particular incident its drawn to my attention what must be an anomaly with the rules whereby you can be penalised twice - once on the water and again by the committee even though you are the innocent party and acknowledged as such - lunacy!

Thirdly, your last point - if you take a 720 or a time penalty that by definition directly affects you on the water for that race - how you perform in other races is irrelevant. What the committee proposed was taking into account our performances in other races to determine what redress we were entitled to.

But then again you always much better at the rules than me!

James
Back to Top
Stefan Lloyd View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 03 Aug 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1599 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Stefan Lloyd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Oct 05 at 5:37pm

So what redress did you ask for? It is best to make it clear what you are hoping for, in my experience.

I don't really follow your argument that the penalty a boat gets is related to its performance in the race. It is normally either a 720, a DSQ or a % time penalty.

 



Edited by Stefan Lloyd
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy