Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Weight equalisation |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 13> |
Author | |
fab100 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 Mar 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1005 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 04 Jan 22 at 6:13pm |
Mozzy’s et al have told you, pay attention - hook should be just above your CoG. If you want more righting moment you need to trapeze low, perpendicular to the mast with the boat absolutely flat as that moves your CoG out marginally further. And be out in your tippy-toes, and in platform boots in your case. Which all works as long as you are not crashing into waves, obvs. As usual, the moral is that if you’d learn to apply accepted best practice, you’d gain far more on the water than by trying to invent new tricks that aren’t there. Interesting thread tho; it’s wakened the place up. |
|
![]() |
|
423zero ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 08 Jan 15 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3420 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Griff, what do you make of the 'dead downwind speed' thing? Thought you would be all over that.
|
|
Robert
|
|
![]() |
|
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Which still gets back to the original question, what's best to achieve that high or low hook?
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3400 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm guessing it's 'cos it's never a steady state, windsurfing we'd pump a couple of times in a gust to get over the hump, the act of extending to windward to counterbalance a slight increase in wind strength will have a similar effect if you are on the point of planing anyway. Once you are planing there is less boat in the water thus less drag so you don't need as much power to keep planing as you did to get planing. I agree WRT the wide/FW idea, I think boats are not so different to windsurfers when it comes to the effects of rocker and planing areas and the basic concepts, that wide flat planing areas get going sooner than narrow/curvy ones is easy to see as is the trade off that wide flat boats are slower in displacement mode.
|
|
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish" |
|
![]() |
|
ChrisI ![]() Posting king ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Aug 10 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 143 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
PS Very interesting data analysis on the RS800 from Mozzy... many thanks.
|
|
![]() |
|
2547 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well I have missed a lot since starting this topic ... I wasn't really expecting to see some people trying to rewrite the laws of physics but I should have expected that.
Anyway ... seems the answer to my original question is that weight equalisation in dinghy sailing is a concept that is almost forgotten bar a few classes in the UK. |
|
![]() |
|
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, exactly what I was planning to do, have even got a set of warehouse scales to set it all up on. Just need to set it up with a model helm that won't shut up moaning all the time. ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, luckily I have, formed years ago water ski race training then windsurfing and mountain biking help. I've also been lucky with my back and knees given the punishment I've handed them all these years and learning this dinghy sailing sh*t is probably the worse, but each year a little better than last, which at my age is something to treasure. |
|
![]() |
|
ChrisI ![]() Posting king ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Aug 10 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 143 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Love the discussion and Happy New Year to all.
Nice picture GRF and glad to see you've been out over Christmas/New Year. Here's a suggestion on your original question (from another engineer ![]() Make up a model but make it with one mast and a trapeze (with weight etc) EACH side so it is exactly balanced. Then without changing the position of the weights change the attachment point on one of them and see if the thing unbalances. |
|
![]() |
|
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I know I've read somewhere the wider area the weight is displaced over, the earlier to plane, it was the physics behind formula boards, it's why wide goes earlier than narrow, and I'm sure the fact that c of g of that out fit moves from the centre line further to weather and the bigger the weight component of the crew of the whole package the earlier it all goes.
Now I'm not disputing all your schoolboy physics bollox, but I swear to God there's more going on with this weight transference, now wether it's the wire angle, the helm angle, but nothing has changed with all your calculations except at some point everything knotches up, and we breakout. Edited by iGRF - 04 Jan 22 at 11:45am |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 13> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |