Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
TheLaserClass |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 89101112 13> |
Author | |||
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3400 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 24 Oct 20 at 1:27pm |
||
What I'm still trying to understand is how ICLA and LPE can both build the 'Kirby Sailboat' (irrespective of what name they give it), surely one must be infringing the IP rights of the other?
|
|||
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish" |
|||
![]() |
|||
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3400 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I stand corrected the WS website has this to say on the matter "It is the responsibility of the ISAF Class Association to manage their Class Rules. All classes, especially those applying for status, are encouraged to use the ISAF Standard Class Rules template when writing their rules." however it's hard to see how one could be accused of stealing the rules for a boat you have the right to build. Sounds like ICLA are clutching at straws. WRT making their own set of class rules a few changes in wording would be sufficient and not much else would be acceptable to WS I guess given the requirement to use the WS rules template.
Edited by Sam.Spoons - 24 Oct 20 at 1:24pm |
|||
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish" |
|||
![]() |
|||
423zero ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 08 Jan 15 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3420 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
https://www.trademarkelite.com/europe/trademark/trademark-owner/VELUM%20LIMITED/243657
|
|||
Robert
|
|||
![]() |
|||
423zero ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 08 Jan 15 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3420 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Over the years licensed builders have come and gone, ultimately leading to the situation we see today where Performance Sailcraft Japan (PSJ) owns the trademark for Japan and Korea, Performance Sailcraft Australia (PSA) owns the trademark for Oceania and Velum (who licenses the trademark to LaserPerformance) claims rights to the LASER trademark in other parts of the world.
Taken from same page.
|
|||
Robert
|
|||
![]() |
|||
By The Lee ![]() Posting king ![]() Joined: 06 Aug 17 Online Status: Offline Posts: 114 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Incorrect the ILCA class rules belong to ILCA and were stolen by the TLC. The TLC have now written their own version.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
423zero ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 08 Jan 15 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3420 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Looking forward, the biggest visible change sailors will see is in the branding of the boats. ILCA does not own or control the LASER trademark and all attempts to achieve a worldwide licensing agreement amongst the three trademark owners for the Laser name and the sunburst logo failed last summer. As a result, in order to comply with World Sailing’s Olympic Equipment Policy, ILCA undertook a rule change vote to remove the requirement that approved builders must also have the rights to use the Laser trademark. The rule change, approved by 79% of the class members, will allow the class to “un-brand” and let new builders sell class legal equipment under alternate brand names. An important point to be made here is that there will no longer be artificial territories for the sale of class legal equipment – builders will now be allowed to compete directly against each other.
This is taken from ILCA page, link below. http://www.laserinternational.org/blog/2020/01/05/international-laser-class-association-the-past-present-and-future-of-our-class/
|
|||
Robert
|
|||
![]() |
|||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Doesn't the multi million US court judgement against LPE demonstrate that they don't have that right? Not that it matters much since LPE are effectively defunct, and doubtless it will take another ten years and many lawyer's paydays to establish what rights LP LLC have. But in any case LP are not claiming to build International Lasers, which would be the limits of World Sailing's rights. Edited by JimC - 24 Oct 20 at 12:52pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
Grumpycat ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 29 Sep 20 Online Status: Offline Posts: 497 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Ha ha
|
|||
![]() |
|||
423zero ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 08 Jan 15 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3420 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
■ ILCA is not legally able to seek new manufacturers for Laser products in LP territory without LP’s consent. LP territory covers the world excluding Australia, New Zealand (PSA) and Japan, Korea (PSJ). This is a simple matter of ownership of intellectual property and LP will enforce against any party who attempts to violate LP’s intellectual property rights. ■ ILCA can indeed appoint new builders in Performance Sailcraft Australia (PSA) and Performance Sailcraft Japan (PSJ) limited territory; however, neither of them can supply boats into LP territory without LP’s consent. ■ PSA has tried in the past to import illegally into LP territory by a variety of schemes. LP has successfully enforced its property rights against PSA and will continue to enforce its rights against PSA and any collaborating dealers or persons. The last of such legal action was in Belgium and it was adjudicated in favor of LP with the dealer involved filing for bankruptcy to avoid payment of award pursuant to the court judgment. This is boats called 'Laser' not boats called 'ILCA' Edited by 423zero - 24 Oct 20 at 11:54am |
|||
Robert
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Grumpycat ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 29 Sep 20 Online Status: Offline Posts: 497 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Err the owner of LPE has been threatening the ILCA with setting up its own class association since it was deselected as a builder because of not allowing factory visits, as confirmed by members of the ILCA committee in various places . The evidence is out there, you just have to look further than asking the 10 people that post on here. If you want some hearsay evidence, when I was talking the the guys on the LPE stand at the dinghy show this year, when I asked why their boats didn’t have the proper WS/ILCA plaques, they said not to worry as they were going to set up their own class later in the year
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 89101112 13> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |