Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Room for an obstruction |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 234 |
Author | |
Nacnud_smada ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 06 Jun 19 Online Status: Offline Posts: 50 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 24 Sep 20 at 7:04am |
Will do thank you
And startboard |
|
![]() |
|
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Start by looking at rule 20.
I can't see any 'room and opportunity' there. What is the time requirement in rule 20.2(a)? What is the time condition in the first clause of rule 20.2(c)? What is the time condition in the second clause of rule 20.2(c)? By the way, what tack were boats on to start with? |
|
![]() |
|
Nacnud_smada ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 06 Jun 19 Online Status: Offline Posts: 50 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi,
Was hoping for some extra input into the following. We had a great debate about it after sailing but did not seem to find an answer well one thag made sense.. As it stand the solo is wrong.. What do you think? Two boats a solo and laser sailing up to a windward mark. There is an obstruction in the way in this case a pontoon. Solo calls for room to tack.. Here's no reply so tacks and then there is a collision (no damage or injury) on the back corner of the laser. Laser is saying. Solo did not give room and opertunity - solo. Said I called waited no reply and needed to tack I said that there has to be some atcipation as both boats know there pontoon is there. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 234 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |