Clubs still allowing sailing

My point was from the data on deaths you can already see some collateral and whilst not as high as the covid deaths, it could be very significant (1/5 or 1/4).  

In many cases this collateral could be avoidable. Hence my point about there being many spare beds which just aren't being used. 

Dogmatically sticking with the first set of rules the government came up with maybe isn't the way forward. And if we can see ways to reduce collateral then we should explore them. We're in this in the long run, and we can do better. 

Now, sailing is much further down the list. But why can't the RYA be thinking about reducing the impact on sailing simultaneously to cancer treatment clinics looking at ways they can continue? Clearly one is more important than the other, but why can't we look at both? Why just resign ourselves to it being part of the collateral damage?  

Sure, after four weeks people aren't dying from not sailing. But in 6 months people will be dying of the cumulative mental and physical tolls of lack of outdoor activity, lack of social contact, economic troubles etc. Refusing to even contemplate discussing reducing this collateral seems odd. Why do have to dogmatically stick to the initial rules? Why can't we review and identify area which could improve people health and quality of life going forward?