Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Keep Clear boat question |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 34567> |
Author | |
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 06 Sep 18 at 2:54pm |
Unless it wasn't reasonably possible for the them to avoid contact, then they both break rule 14. If they engaged in a wacky dance of changing course, then both could argue it wasn't reasonably possible to avoid the other who was changing their course so often and so rapidly.
But as neither boat is right of way, neither can say they were waiting until it was clear the other wasn't avoiding contact. As neither boat is right of way, there is no requirement to give the other boat room to keep clear when they change course either. However, unlike keeping clear, there does have to be contact for rule 14 to be broken. So they could engage in a pretty wacky dance of avoiding action without breaking any rules as long as they don't collide. In reality, yellow can only really bear away from close hauled, so it would be obvious to blue that they should also bear away (possibly gybing). |
|
![]() |
|
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Like this ^? Both on starboard. Overlapped as neither is clear astern. Both are on the leeward side of the other at position 2, therefore both are leeward boats, but then both are also leeward boats as they classify as the 'other' in the leeward and windward definition. But the only one can be leeward and the other de-facto windward if one is leeward. mmm confused again now, can both be keep clear boat and right of way boat at the same time?? Possibly the answer is that at position 1, red is on the leeward side of blue, therefore blue is the windward and keep clear boat under rule 11. So pretty clear cut at that point. The difficulty would be telling the exact point when blue passed in front of red, going on to the leeward side of red, so both boats can be defined as leeward boats.
Edited by mozzy - 06 Sep 18 at 3:19pm |
|
![]() |
|
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3400 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As neither one is 'to windward' of the other neither can be give way boat so back to rule 14
|
|
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish" |
|
![]() |
|
Noah ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Dec 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 611 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In the new scenario, Y has a boat to leeward (but nowt to windward) and is therefore (a) windward boat. B also has a boat to leeward (and nowt to w/w) and is also (a) windward boat.
So where before neither was the right of way boat because neither had a boat to windward of them, now they both have right of way because they both have boats to windward! This makes my head hurt!
|
|
Nick
D-Zero 316 |
|
![]() |
|
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3400 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I blame Steve Cockrill, before his 4th Dimension nobody sailed by the lee
![]() |
|
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish" |
|
![]() |
|
davidyacht ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1345 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
But whereas the first scenario is more dependent upon sailing by the lee, the second is less dependent. Surely one of these situations will occur pretty much anytime a beating boat meets a same tack boat that is on a run? For years I have happily called starboard close hauled and met with no discontent ... likewise I have altered course to avoid same tack beating boats when I have been on a run; but it would appear that I now have to engage in a dance off. It would seem that there is something amiss with the rules if it forces a Mexican standoff when boats meet.
|
|
Happily living in the past
|
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6661 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Go through the scenarios, in particular what rights of way are as the boats close. Think you'll find you are worrying abut nothing. When running boats on the same tack and not running deep by the lee then there's a clear windward and leeward, and it all works as you think it does.
|
|
![]() |
|
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3400 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
At pos 1 Blue is to windward of Red so must be keep clear boat (as would be the case in the original situation, if Blue was not sailing by the lee Yellow would be leeward boat and have RoW.
|
|
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish" |
|
![]() |
|
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3400 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
And if rule 11 applies until Yellow crosses Blue's bow then the situation can't arise unless Blue changes course at the last minute?
|
|
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish" |
|
![]() |
|
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I follow the reasoning of this, but as a matter of fact blue is upwind of yellow. Why don’t the rules define the upwind boat as the windward boat?
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 34567> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |