Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 161752 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
PY Numbers for 2017 |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1920212223 25> |
Author | |
Paramedic ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 27 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 929 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 14 Mar 17 at 11:13am |
Where did you make that up from. This link explains what the great lakes handicaps are. http://greatlakes.org.uk/The-Method.php Nothing about fleet size that I can find [/QUOTE] If you read the article it tells you that the numbers are based on data from the winter events = big fleet. |
|
![]() |
|
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3401 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
And they discount the results of slower sailors in each class so the GLN reflects the performance of the boat when well sailed (i.e. it's potential rather than it's 'average' performance).
|
|
![]() |
|
Cirrus ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 590 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If you read the article it tells you that the numbers are based on data from the winter events = big fleet.
Anyone that has raced in the SJ series knows that many races ARE Pursuit and many others are events where fast/medium/slow start divisions are used. The point is that vast majority of say Solo or Ents will not be racing off the same line at exactly the same time as 505s or similar for virtually all of the time. In pursuits everyone should also get a relatively clear air start as well . However the events do attract a high(er) proportion of good examples of many classes - and they do race on the same water on the same day .... and that is the key point. The large fleet 'explanation' still holds overall as the sub-divisions themselves are large with 50+ on each sub start being common. And the hypothetical Ents and Solo's etc mentioned above get to race against boats of broadly similar speed capability. These events often / usually max out in terms of entries. They do enjoy good event organisation and the GL system does result in close competitive racing so they are doing something right for sure. The PN and for that matter other handicap systems could be better still - but the PN system in particular seems far less able to adapt given its basic methodology. It is seemingly incapable of evolution .... and some numbers are really way off - hence GL in part. We can discuss the underlying causes and the impact of their method and sampling strategy (the"all you can get" approach ?) but without any sampling change it really will remain a 'blunt knife'. |
|
![]() |
|
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3401 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I suppose the biggest difference will be that the GL handicaps reflect the potential of the boat and the PN the performance of the average boat/helm. I'd agree that the former is better (in theory at least).
|
|
![]() |
|
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It doesn't reflect the potential at all. It is simply a narrower sample of sailors. There is nothing to say that entries in any one class are of equal ability to another.
|
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|
![]() |
|
Cirrus ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 590 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It doesn't reflect the potential at all.....
And so what would be your (practical) alternative to get closer to measuring 'potential' ? .. one thing is certain though ... the raw PN system 'technique' does not even attempt to produce such numberical results. Furthermore in its current 'measure everything on offer' with little or no structuring or qualification it never will. Any handicap system will have both crew and boat factors wrapped up in the numbers and these factors are difficult to disaggregate. However the success of the GL numbers and the closeness of the racing provided does indicate their numbers are perhaps getting a damn sight closer to what people really want ! |
|
![]() |
|
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3401 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
TBF, it's the front 10% that sail a boat close to it's potential, the rest sail it to a lower standard so if you concentrate on those faster sailors you get a handicap that is closer to the boats speed.
|
|
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish" |
|
![]() |
|
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm not trying to measure potential, so I don't need a method. I take the view that measuring actual results over years of differing conditions is going to give better average than picking 6 or 7 weekends of racing at largeish water venues and removing most of the data, or trying to plug things into a spreadsheet based on the very results people are deriding.
|
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|
![]() |
|
Cirrus ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 590 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fair enough .. so PN is fine as it is for you. Nothing wrong with that either. Want to see the difference ?
Try running your local result timings under both sets of handicap figures. You might be surprised, or then again maybe
not..... |
|
![]() |
|
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3401 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Actually I'd expect it to have the opposite effect but, obviously it depends on how the GL committee decides who the "Poor performers [who] are excluded before class handicaps are computed in order to prevent undue influence by those who were late to the start, having a bad day or simply new to the sport or the boat." However, I applaud a system that tries, at least, to eliminate the 'crew factor' from handicapping. The handicap should reflect the boats performance as much as it's possible to do so.
Edited by Sam.Spoons - 14 Mar 17 at 7:54pm |
|
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish" |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1920212223 25> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |