Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 161752 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
PY Numbers for 2017 |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 56789 25> |
Author | |
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 06 Mar 17 at 12:17pm |
So what would be so wrong about trialling a system based on fact with a fixed boat performance quotient and just manage the crew element by data submission, so you'd have say in the Laser a fixed figure of 1000, but the current national average crew quotient is 95 and just vary that bit, at least it would lend some logic for understanding when you try to explain to folk that it's not the Laser that's getting slower it's just more duffers are sailing it and or an organisation wants to make it more appealing for Laser helms to participate in one group of events so they manipulate the figures to their own particular advantage and don't worry about screwing the rest of us. ;-)
|
|
![]() |
|
jeffers ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Off you go then.
|
|
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
|
![]() |
|
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think it might be worthtaking a step back and asking what we'd actually achieve by getting the numbers right.
Half the time it wouldn't change the results significantly. Much of the rest of the time, 3/4 of the fleet don't care too much about the results anyway. And some times it's positively a good thing that it's not always the best sailiors that win. The best sailors should be setting up their own goals in club racing, and looking a bit above maximising their haul of pots in the Wilmington On Sea YC. Thinking about it too much just gets in the way of enjoying the racing on the water. I've made a rule for myself not to discuss PY at my club that uses PY. If I cannot cope with being beaten by Scorpions I wll lose 2 stone and buy a bloody Scorpion. Up to that point I will settle for blowing them away when the reach suits us and keep trying to put pressure on the 4000. From an academic perspective, I quite like the idea of a formula-based rule, which would encourage the design of boats which were fast and efficient for their size and so forth. But as very few people are willing or able to keep buying new bespoke boats, I don't see people wanting it. |
|
![]() |
|
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There is a growing group of single hander sailors that sail together regularly they've picked a boat they like or tolerate and they enjoy racing each other, they know the relative speeds and conditions where each of them and their craft excel or not, but they sail on the national handicap because the politics of varying from it are prohibitive. So they get more and more peeved off by the various forces that combine to make their coming together increasingly more pointless.
These craft are Solo's, Streakers, Supernovas Solutions Blaze and Phantoms and similar Unrig boats that take on Lasers week in week out. In their way they are building a close design fleet the Solo/Streaker thing is contentious as the faster boat gets constantly slower and the slower boat is deigned faster and the constant slowing of the Laser is also aggravating paticularly with all the additional options out there that have in reality sped the damn thing up in the last ten years, not to mention 'training and or replica' sails. Rolling out the same old same old line of varying at local level just doesn't wash, something has to be done at national level to stop all this. |
|
![]() |
|
KazRob ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 Oct 16 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 245 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have to say iGRF that the idea of a scratch boat is a good idea and the core of many rating systems as I understand it (even if the scratch boat is imaginary and only exists in computer models). If there was to be a scratch boat in the PY that all other boats moved relative to, then it has to be the Laser full rig. Millions of them, been around for ages and mega tight class rules (ignoring replica sails). There we go me agreeing with GRF - must make it a good idea 😜
|
|
![]() |
|
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So, the Laser isn't sailing to handicap, according to thousands of results. Change that one boat, or all the others, as that one is fixed?
|
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|
![]() |
|
G.R.F. ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 10 Aug 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 4028 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Precisely, the reason this system fails is precisely because the system trys to work out what handicap everyone would need to finish equally or so I'm led to believe, but equal to what? Equal to the boat that won that particular race. So it depends on the relationship of said Laser to whatever is the fastest boat in any given race environment and in the example of the Great Lakes lot, the lead boat of whatever it's type is very likely to be sailing quickly and so the Laser needs a bigger and more generously favoured handicap. So it is nothing to do with the Laser or it's integral speed or even who is sailing it, the system is defined by the speed of lead boats around the country and they are clearly getting quicker. We'll never know that of course unless there is an anchor and the Laser should be it. Edited by G.R.F. - 06 Mar 17 at 9:44pm |
|
![]() |
|
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
But what physical reason could there be for the Laser not sailing to handicap? The boat hasn't gotten slower and it gets more results than almost all others combined.
|
|
![]() |
|
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stick, wrong end of.
|
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|
![]() |
|
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Defining the laser as fixed would avoid the trap of returns from clubs that adjust their numbers being distorted by everything being rebased. For instance if clubx fiddles with its numbers and normally knocks 10 points off Merlins, because they win everything, the 400 return will be skewed if there are a lot of 400 vs Merlin races. But is a Laser the right reference for debating the ratio of 400 to 4000? I don't think so! Neither is it much use for a club correcting the slow handicap of Mirror, topper etc. Plus IMHO, the Laser is for racing other L@sers, people who do mostly PY really ought to consider getting something else. It must be the boat which is most likely to not figure in the returns due to having OD racing. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 56789 25> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |