Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 161752 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Hadron H2 |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1415161718 32> |
Author | |||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 15 Mar 16 at 3:37pm |
||
It sounds about the same weight as the blaze all up, same length.
Blaze hull a bit lower and narrower, but carrying the racks. Looks quite a slippy hull. I guess PY slower than a blaze, but the extra leverage and sail area will pull it ahead of Finns and Megabytes. Faster than an Aero upwind maybe but slower off wind My sweepstake PY entry 1035-1040 ?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
maxibuddah ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Mar 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1760 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I reckon you've done a good job keeping the hadron at that weight Keith. It's a lot of material and also very fine to look at.
|
|||
Everything I say is my opinion, honest
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Cirrus ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 590 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
... those awful early polyester Blazes....
... which have proved still very capable of getting in the top 5 and actually winning the National championships on several occasions in recent years against any of the later boats. All involved worked very hard to ensure a pretty level playing field was preserved when the later deck moulding etc was developed. You might not believe it but if you doubt it do check the Nationals results (inc. sail numbers) over the last decade after the later version was introduced. There is little wrong at all with well maintained polyester foam sandwich with a newish sail on top. No - Sorry we just can't buy into that particular 'urban myth' - and the facts are very checkable. BTW - Regularly mentioning the class, even in overtly -ve light on occasion as here, does do a fair bit to maintain class awareness. Carry on .... ![]() Edited by Cirrus - 14 Mar 16 at 9:17pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
Keith_Callaghan ![]() Groupie ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Apr 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 80 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
The Phantom is a light boat for its size - all credit to the manufacturers who have achieved this. The H2, however, has the advantage of the advances in materials that have been made over the years since the Phantom class rules were formulated: the H2 is built using carbon instead of glass. So it should be lighter than a Phantom, yes? Well no - because the H2 has 20% more material surface area than a Phantom. So that's why the Phantom and the H2 are about the same weight. |
|||
![]() |
|||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I was never that taken with my Phant... Various reasons, but wheeling it around the dinghy wasn't one of them. Very nice stable manners... If the H2 is close enough to the Phantom in this respect, then I can see it as nothing but positive- especially compared to other great hulks like the Finn, Contender or those awful early polyester Blazes.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
maxibuddah ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Mar 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1760 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Phantoms are only 61kgs min weight including centreboard and fixed fittings and rope, so for the size of them they are pretty light, especially as that weight was fixed in 1971 when epoxy wasn't used. Ok not aero weight but I think its pretty good, oh and they can be built up to 3 kgs lighter and correctors added
|
|||
Everything I say is my opinion, honest
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Suspect that tall of the additional topsides, foredeck and bouyancy tanks adds a bit of weight over the phantom, but its more 200 sized in the flesh so I don't think heavy for what it is.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Total sailing weight same as Phantom? Assuming that means the boat, not boat + Gordon, that seems heavy to me? Hadron is shorter and designed decades later? Or are Phantoms lighter than I think? |
|||
![]() |
|||
gordon1277 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 10 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 665 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Hi Keith
Makes sense this minnimum weight, make it 100kg and keep all the nasty light weights out who spoil boats, by making them easy to de power and then pass us all downwind. Could you add a minnimum height as well to keep poisened dwarfs out. Weight correctors in the bouyancy jacket and stilted dinghy boots for those who are short. Regards Gordon ![]() |
|||
Gordon
Lossc |
|||
![]() |
|||
Keith_Callaghan ![]() Groupie ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Apr 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 80 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
The H2 class rules are now in their final draft. We are going to try to avoid any of the SMOD dictatorial stuff, so one design hull but some latitude with rig, fittings. Total sailing weight is going to be about the same as a Phantom, but that will be clarified very shortly. A minimum weight will be specified in th rules.
|
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1415161718 32> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |