New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: The predictability of PYAG
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

The predictability of PYAG

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 12>
Author
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The predictability of PYAG
    Posted: 05 Mar 16 at 10:02pm
What is the difference in meaning of the two lists of clubs thanked at the end? Are the published numbers based only on the clubs in the first list or both?
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Mar 16 at 10:11pm
I think the first list are clubs who submitted an old style return, not using the pyonline website. All returns count, but there are so few of the old style returns now they are kinda submerged.

Edited by JimC - 05 Mar 16 at 10:13pm
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Mar 16 at 10:54pm
That's what I figured, but the note says that the PY scheme is only possible because of the returns from the first group. Presumably that's not strictly true and just having the second group is enough?
Back to Top
Cirrus View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 29 Oct 15
Location: UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 590
Post Options Post Options   Quote Cirrus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Mar 16 at 11:49pm
Chris 249

The NS is very different to Icon.  An over-rotating (highly expensive) fully battened rig on a 'racing snake' narrow hull today mostly suitable to diminuative or emaciated crews makes the NS a bit more 'specialist' than Icon surely.

Nothing wrong with that - if that is what suits you.   We could have as easly used a Merlin hull as a starting point.  But we actualy sailed both ourselves first and leaned slightly more towards the NS.  Despite its positive attributes however it was absolutely hopeless for 'regular' sized folks, lackluste in lighter winds and was needlessly over-complicated rig wise - and expensive. (If you did want a lightweights specialist the National 12 over here already more adaquately fills that slot). We could go on but  life is too short ...  In the end we cannibalised the test NS's for fittings and the hulls remains  probably ended up in a landfill site.

The objective was NOT ever a faster 'NS' or even 'big' N.12 for that matter anyway - but a modern 2-sail simple boat TWO regular sized people of today could enjoy across the wind range... and afford. 

Bottom line is a lot of folks have opinion on handicap - well they always do don't they - often even on boats they have 1) never seen in the flesh 2) never raced against  3) never sailed themselves.  Now tell us which, if any of these categories, don't you quite belong in ?  Wink


Back to Top
Chris 249 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2041
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chris 249 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 16 at 1:40am
Yep, I've never seen an Icon, and have never pretended to have done so.  But one can also say that a lot of people have opinions on handicap even on boats where they (1) have a sentimental interest and understandable pride in because they developed them; (2) have had a strong and direct economic interest in.  They are both categories you fit in, and surely you would admit that your views must be somewhat influenced as a result.  So neither of us is in a situation of perfect information and perfect objectivity.  I did NOT pretend to be an expert nor did I try to draw firm conclusions - I said there were "indications" that the rating "may not be too far off."

It's reasonable to point these issues out to Grumpf  because of the abusive, vicious and defamatory attacks that Grumpf has made on volunteers in relation to PY.  To stay silent when one sailor keeps sliming the volunteers our sport relies upon seems wrong.  Pointing out that the issue is not as simple as he makes out seems reasonable. 

The NS14/Tasar/Contender comparison is arguably pretty valid because it gives an interesting insight into the only other major sailing country in which there is a lot of yardstick racing involving boats similar to the Icon.  The Tasar and NS14 have been rated identically down here for some time.  The Tasar does not have a "racing snake" hull - it has underwater sections from about 1970, and it has an ideal crew weight of around 140kg.  Your own advertising claims that the Icon is faster than the Tasar.  

In Australia, the Tasar and NS14 were rated for years at 0.5% slower than the Contender.  I thought this rating was harsh on the Tasar, but then again our Tasar fleet (including #3 in the country) used to do OK against the #2 Contender in the country.

In Germany, the Tasar is rated 1% slower than a Contender.  In America, the Tasar is rated 2% FASTER than the Contender, and the V15 (vaguely Tasar/Icon-ish) is rated just 0.5% slower than the Contender.

So if other rating authorities around the world have been rating the Tasar (a similar boat to the Icon but shorter, older and slower) as about 1% slower than a Contender, is it really so bad that the newer, longer Icon with its wobbly pole and carbon stick is rated as fast as a Contender?

I'm not claiming that I can say where the Icon should rate, and I never have done that.  All that I have ever done is to try to defend the PY volunteers against Grumpf's revolting personal attacks, by bringing up objective evidence that the Icon's yardstick may not be the creation of corruption and stupidity as he has claimed. 

      





Edited by Chris 249 - 06 Mar 16 at 2:41am
Back to Top
salmon80 View Drop Down
Posting king
Posting king


Joined: 29 Nov 10
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 119
Post Options Post Options   Quote salmon80 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 16 at 2:29am
Why is their so much discussion on this forum about the icon? Isn't there only about 3 ever made

It seems to me that it gets too much attention
Back to Top
Rupert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 04
Location: Whitefriars sc
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8956
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rupert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 16 at 7:10am
I think it gets attention firstly because the development was pretty public on here, but also because it shows the difficulties new boats face breaking into a crowded, shrinking market. One school of thought is that the yardstick a boat is given as an EN has an effect on boat sales. This is either grossly blown out of proportion, or sailors really will do anything to win a handicap race. I hope for sailing's sake the former is true. The explosion of the Aero would hopefully suggest that if the product is wanted, handicap isn't any sort of issue at all.
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
Back to Top
RS400atC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Dec 08
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3011
Post Options Post Options   Quote RS400atC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 16 at 10:33am
The icon was an interesting development for many reasons.
Although I was never in the market for a two sail, two person boat, I was very interested in the thoughts behind hull and rig design.
My view would be that comparing it to a Contender is exactly what's wrong with many people's expectation of PY.
When there is enough breeze for a Contender to be in its element, an Icon will be basically overpowered. When an Icon is at its design wind and looking nice, a contender sailor will be tentatively on the wire and looking grumpy.
Both fine enough boats, but very different performance vs windpseed profiles.
Then look at how each is affected by courses...
Back to Top
Cirrus View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 29 Oct 15
Location: UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 590
Post Options Post Options   Quote Cirrus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 16 at 9:24pm
 Yep, I've never seen an Icon, and have never pretended to have done so.... (etc)

Did not really really need to bother with the justification stuff that followed - just stop there.  QED.



Edited by Cirrus - 06 Mar 16 at 9:40pm
Back to Top
iGRF View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 07 Mar 11
Location: Hythe
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6499
Post Options Post Options   Quote iGRF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 16 at 10:33pm
Originally posted by salmon80

Why is their so much discussion on this forum about the icon? Isn't there only about 3 ever made
It seems to me that it gets too much attention

Only because it's another victim of what could either be a trade cartel, a corrupt body, a curmudgeonly agenda, or just plain idiocracy, you choose, but either way the number they gave the Icon is vastly out, and I have sailed it, extensively on all kinds of water and a paltry 7 point increase goes nowhere near, the best comparison could be the Merlin, that consistently beats it whenever their kite is deployed.

Edited by iGRF - 06 Mar 16 at 10:35pm
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy