Americas cup |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 45678 9> |
| Author | ||
Chris 249
Really should get out more
Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Americas cupPosted: 02 Nov 15 at 2:21am |
|
|
"Boffins"??? That sounds like you are just denigrating people who have spent years studying these issues because you don't like the answers they give. The studies of the impact of major sports events on participation rates have been subject to a lot of examination and they are pretty well accepted these days.
Yes, I did look at the survey I quoted, and I did quote it correctly. It says "Among all adults, the participant base halved (down 3 percentage points to 3%)" on page 16. A participation rate that goes from 6% to 3% means that the participation rate in the sport has halved just like the report stated using that exact term. It didn't lose 3% of those who actually sailed, it lost 50% of the 6% who had formerly sailed.
I have been studying fleet sizes for entry-level classes, and for other classes, for years. However, that seems to show no link between the AC and fleet sizes, because the major English-speaking countries with no AC entry in recent years have got very strong entry level and teenager classes - about as strong as those that did have AC entries and regattas. If kids were so inspired by the AC then why is the junior scene doing just as well (perhaps better) in the major English-speaking countries that HAVEN'T had a recent AC? Sure, the kids would get a buzz from AC crews - they got a buzz from meetings we arranged where they got to meet Olympians, and when I was a kid I got a buzz from seeing AC boats around. But where is the evidence that such a buzz actually retains people? Where is the evidence that the buzz has to be generated by the modern style of AC, rather than by a possible alternative model that made the sport look more accessible at the top level? Even if seeing an AC boat and crew got kids into the sport, how effective is that given how few there are in the world? Yes, older people may drop out of sailing because of lack of time, and it's great to get them young (although whether that is vital is an open question) and use low-cost opportunities - so why put the emphasis on part of the sport that is extremely expensive and will be extremely taxing on the scarce free time they will have later in life? There have been many studies on why people don't do sport. There have also been two major surveys on why people don't sail. The same answers keep on coming out - people are short of time and money, and sailing is seen as expensive, elitist and inaccessible. The current route of the AC certainly does not make the sport look economical and approachable. Anyway, I'll end it there because it seems to be confirmed that there is NO evidence that the AC is helping the sport as is claimed, and the sport seems to be unwilling to examine the abundance of evidence about the factors that are involved. PS - I've been racing our large-ish and fast-ish off-the-beach cat recently (well, we weren't fast in drifters and 180 degree shifts the last few races, sadly) with youth and young adults from trap boats and all our kids started in Tornadoes, F16s windsurfers and skiff trainers. I also created a youth board class that attracted about half of the top Aussie kids from skiff trainers for a while. Just thought I'd mention it to ensure I wasn't seen as someone who is against high performance and multis, or someone who doesn't have contact with yoof. Edited by Chris 249 - 02 Nov 15 at 2:43am |
||
![]() |
||
Richard Gladwell
Newbie
Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: Takapuna Online Status: Offline Posts: 20 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Nov 15 at 1:22am |
|
|
Chris
Like I said you need to compare fleet sizes on entry level classes to see whether they are going up or down, rather than relying on some study of a statistical or university boffin to tell you how your sport is doing. Also get onto the beach and see the look on the kids faces and see if they have had a lift, or what happens when one of the America's Cup crews come to the club. You have to have the programs working at a very granular level to pull the kids into the sport - which means giving very kid in your club's catchment area between say the age of 10-12 yrs a practical, on the water sailing experience. If you look at the survey you quoted you will see it for adult sport (people above 18years old) and of course the trend is down (by 3%) which is not actually a lot. Particularly amongst a group which is increasingly time starved. If you are trying to grow a sport using 18 years old plus adults, you have long missed the bus. You needed to be into them 10 years earlier and before they left primary school, and with low-entry cost opportunities. Parents will spend if they can see their kid is interested in the sports and wants to do it. If they think it is just the next fad (which is the case for a lot of kids sports as there is a lot on offer), then they will avoid the capital outlay on a sport they don't understand. About 50% or more of the sailing intake are now from non-sailing families which is a dramatic change from 40-50 years ago where you often did your father's sport. Plus if you get kids while they are young and give them the sailing basics for a year or two, often they will come back in their 20's as they know the basics and can increase their skill beyond that of someone who has never sailed and lacks the confidence to try. RG |
||
![]() |
||
Chris 249
Really should get out more
Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Nov 15 at 9:53pm |
|
|
I still can't see any actual evidence that the AC will actually lift sailing participation, Richard. With respect, saying that a lift in profile "eventually increases numbers" is demonstrated to be false by lots of surveys and studies over many years. And why should we take any such claims by AC supporters on faith?
We could use the analogy with the Olympics. Both the London and Sydney Olympics increased the profile of sport generally, but the simple numbers show that they did NOT result in more people doing sport. Yes, academics may have blind spots, but so can sailors and the sailing media. The difference is that there have been plenty of studies about the factors that drive sports participation and these have actually asked questions and investigated issues, whereas sailing as a sport seems to be resting on completely untested assumptions - assumptions which are probably incorrect according to participation trends within the sport and according to studies and trends across sports generally. Apologies for saying "SPARC". I meant to say SPARC and other organisations that have carried on with studies tracking sports participation trends, such as the Sport New Zealand 2013/14 Active New Zealand Survey. That survey shows sailing a loooong way down in the participation rankings, behind sports like badminton and scuba diving which I assume have a low profile. Going back a bit, the 97-08 trend, for example, showed that for sailing "among all adults, the participant base halved (down 3 percentage
points to 3%)." Data from http://www.srknowledge.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Sport-Participation-Trends.pdf. This was at a time when the AC was being won and defended by NZ and a Kiwi was skippering the Volvo winner. If lifting the profile lifts participation then why was there such a stark drop in participation during the period in which NZ won the AC and Volvo? If the new cats have increased participation then why has the participation rate dropped again more recently? Sure, those who are at the top of the sport may have been inspired by a high profile event, but that is an extraordinarily biased sample by its very definition. It doesn't take into account those who have been turned off a sport, or those who never even considered it because the image is that it's too expensive, time consuming and elitist. Yes, there have been demographic changes in many English-speaking countries - but sports like cycling (which is seen as low class in some Asian countries) are doing well despite such shifts. Canoeing is booming in many English-speaking countries despite demographic changes, so why not sailing? As you say, "All you can do is try the best you can, see what the numbers are doing, and if you are getting a good result keep going, and if not then have a re-think." The numbers are in (in several countries) and the results of the current approach based on elitism are not good, so surely we need a re-think. Apologies if this seems like Kiwi bashing. It's far from that (I'm an admirer of Kiwi sailors as I'm sure everyone in the sport is) and the problem of elitism and a belief that watching creates participation seems to be pretty much global. PS re "So your sailing profile is always going to struggle against Cricket, AFL, NRL, Rugby etc" Yep, sailing has a lower profile than cricket, AFL, NRL, Rugby etc. But not one of those high-profile sports is at the top of the list in PARTICIPATION. Despite the huge sums that flow from TV rights to grass roots promotion, AFL is less popular than soccer, and NRL and union are less popular than volleyball, netball, lawn bowls, canoeing and not much more popular than diving or sailing. Doesn't that illustrate once more than high ratings does not result in lifting participation? Edited by Chris 249 - 01 Nov 15 at 11:20pm |
||
![]() |
||
Richard Gladwell
Newbie
Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: Takapuna Online Status: Offline Posts: 20 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Nov 15 at 12:35pm |
|
|
[QUOTE=Chris 249]
[QUOTE=Richard Gladwell]There is no doubt that when the Cup is held in a major world sailing centre (sorry, I don't call Bermuda a major world sailing centre) that it does lift the profile of the sport, and does pull young sailors into it.
With the greatest respect, where's the proof? Where is the evidence of a major boom in sailing in San Francisco over the last couple of years? A very quick Google shows that the number of competitors in the inter-school challenge around that area has not changed at all in many years. RG: It certainly lifted the profile of the sport in SFO - evidenced by the grief when it went to Bermuda. You do need to have the clubs and schools push programs to get new sailors into the sport. Certainly in Auckland there was a big lift in the sports profile when the AC was here, and even in 2013 and its build up, there was a lift in profile which eventually reflects in numbers. Sailors who are on the up, often quote their source of inspiration for getting into the sport as having seen a Whitbread finish, an America's Cup etc The reason being that they see the other side of the America's Cup - big boats going out training each day - stories about boats sailing on TV news a couple of times a week in the build up. They can see the boats and activity at the bases, and so on. If so why is sailing attracting so few young Kiwis according to SPARC? RG: SPARC went out of existence a few years ago, and if they are using YNZ membership numbers then there are a lot of games played to keep the numbers down to reduce the levy the Clubs have to pay YNZ, which makes your membership look low. I look at the numbers participating in Opti Nationals as an indicator of numbers, when the regatta is in Auckland the numbers seem to be on the increase - when it goes to other centres there is the travel cost which affects numbers. But I don't think we are seeing a fall in numbers, or one that is out of line with participation in sport generally. Optis aren't my favorite boat, but they are the entry level class, and a good measurement. When the event is in another location, they mostly get fed the dark side of the America's Cup until the live coverage starts, then it is cool again. The national fervor also kicks in and sailing becomes like any other major sport with international competition. AC doesn't lead the sport, but it is one of its shop windows - like the Olympics (but unfortunately sailing gets swamped with the coverage of other sports), Like the Volvo Ocean Race which again has big impact in a stopover and for about a week before and a month afterwards. Then you might get some lift off world championships and the like. Once again, there seems to be an assumption that major events lift participation rates. This has been studied by many independent academics (especially in relation to the Olympics) and found to normally be untrue. I can get citations later. RG: If you have the programs in place to capture the new sailors it has to be easier with the sport having a raised profile - especially if you are a "top four" sport. Plus you get a lift from Olympic medals. You have to look at the basis of the stuff academics come up with - and whether they actually know anything about the sport, so they can test their theories and findings with a reality check. Plus there is a lot of immigration into the developed sailing countries from people without a sailing culture - so they gravitate towards the sports they enjoyed at "home" or their parents palyed - and stay out of sailing - which they also perceive as being expensive. The "new" AC has huge potential and the general media does "get" the sport and concept because it looks fast, awesome and dangerous. But the AC is appallingly marketed and you would really have to try to think of how to do a worse job than is being done at present. In fact I couldn't think of one thing they could do worse, except maybe have the racing at night. I don't really want to talk about Auckland and New Zealand, but it does demonstrate a couple of things. In Auckland you have a lot of clubs in an area that is good for sailing, but that creates the issues of them working alone, rather than together. And each has a good historical reasons for being established and being where they are - which is that in the 1950's and earlier people didn't really have the ability to drive boats to the club with trailers, and the English model was the norm - where you had a club and a boatpark and people kept their boats at the club and walked or cycled to the club, stayed there for most of the day and went sailing. That model will come back in Auckland because people now just do not have the space at home to store boats. Outside Auckland you have a different model - where there is one club per town (Wellington, Christchurch and Dunedin being halfway houses), everyone sails at the one club and there are really none of the Auckland issues. Oddly enough most of the top sailors don't come from Auckland but from outside - Tauranga has probably produced more top sailors of late than any other centre. More than half the crew from NZL-32 came from outside Auckland, originally. We get the same issue with clubs not working together in Australia, but the sailing participation rate here may be higher these days. RG: You don't have a national AC team in Australia, and haven't had a Volvo OR team either. You do have the Olympic results but like everywhere else the sailing result gets lost in the success of other sports. General media regard sailing medals as soft medals, and don't give the Olympic side of the sport much coverage except on quiet news days. So your sailing profile is always going to struggle against Cricket, AFL, NRL, Rugby etc. Not having a Volvo team in NZ this time was a big mistake and the profile of the sport suffered as a result. I don't think the numbers are really changing that much, everyone has their view of the glory days, some fleets diminish others grow. Any big ticket sports have the same issues as sailing - rowing for instance. There's a couple of us in this thread who are using quantitative data to track trends, and the numbers ARE showing significant differences in overall participation and showing a move away from the high performance classes. The fact that we don't have a sound overall knowledge of where the numbers are going is a bit of an indictment on those running the sport, IMHO. How can you manage something if you don't know what it is, what is has been, and where it is going?
RG: There are massive lifestyle changes underway in society which are driving a lot of what we are seeing in sailing. The black art of tinkering with boats is fast-dying for a number of reasons. I don't think sailing is a sport that you can manage in terms of participation. All you can do is try the best you can, see what the numbers are doing, and if you are getting a good result keep going, and if not then have a re-think. There is no doubt that kids like sailing on fast boats - but that takes a certain mentality to be sustainable in the medium to long term, and most opt for the tactical one-designs. The other issue is parents who think that the most significant thing their kid can do in life is to go to university and get a fancy degree in finance or law - and actively discourage participation in sport to achieve that goal. Of course the kids want to go to University in some location that is remote from their parents, for all the obvious reasons - and in doing so they desert their main sponsor and support network for sailing. But one only has to look at the numbers of relatively wealthy professional sailors (in NZ at least) to recognize the folly of chasing a degree at the expense of sport. Russell Coutts is probably the highest earning sportsman in NZ - but it took him 10 years to complete his Engineering degree. Most of the others have no degrees, but the Olympic sailors and those in the second and third tiers get good government assistance with degree funding o the basis of their sports performance - so the incentives are there, to do both. RG Edited by Richard Gladwell - 01 Nov 15 at 12:36pm |
||
![]() |
||
Chris 249
Really should get out more
Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Oct 15 at 9:50pm |
|
Basically, the point is that the whole idea that watching a sport encourages participation is dubious. This is demonstrated by a wide variety of studies and survey results from many countries (for example as in Wladmir Andreff's work from the Sorbonne, or Grix in Leveraging Legacies from Sports Mega-Events: Concepts and Cases). This may be particularly so in the case of the AC, where the kit is completely different from anything the typical sailor or family would normally use or own. If the AC had a significant effect on participation, especially in its host city, then it would be pretty easy to demonstrate it. So why not demand proof of these claims? Finally, we DO have a good grip on why people don't do sport and why they don't sail, and the modern AC does nothing to alleviate the perceived issues and probably makes them worse. Again, this pretty well demonstrated - so why should we believe those who say the AC increases particpation? When we get down to it, there are studies and surveys that show that the AC will NOT increase participation and may harm it, and basically zero to say it will - so why should the sailing media and the sailing public believe any claims that the AC will help sailing?
|
||
![]() |
||
Rupert
Really should get out more
Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Oct 15 at 12:05pm |
|
|
The general public I suspect just see it as rich people behaving oddly, rather than as a sport. Formula 1 is going to end up like that if they aren't careful, and football is making great strides to that, yet in the latter case people still feel connected to the game, whereas with sailing they assume we are all richt**ts.
|
||
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
Richard Gladwell
Newbie
Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: Takapuna Online Status: Offline Posts: 20 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Oct 15 at 2:36am |
|
Exactly - they need to realise that if they want to foot it with the Big Boys on the international sporting scene they need the controversy between games, as well as the on field action. Sponsors might not be too thrilled with it, but it does pull the general media, and with it the non-sailing fans, and that grows the fan base- which works for the sponsors. These pristine sports events don't fool anyone, and they just lose all their colour without the controversy. Sure there are limits but Dalts (and others before him) makes a lot of very accurate comment at times. How would Tom Blackaller be regarded by ACEA for some of the comments he made in the past? RG |
||
![]() |
||
Richard Gladwell
Newbie
Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: Takapuna Online Status: Offline Posts: 20 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Oct 15 at 2:29am |
|
|
"Can't get"? Who in their right mind would want to be put through what the last Jury were put through and still are - two years after the end of the event.
They were attacked and harassed by several parties some of whom were involved in the Cup. Others took it on themselves to "make matters right". Several (if not all of the Jury) are still subject to action by one aggrieved party in the Californian State legal system. It is all very well for some to claim that these guys didn't follow process in the heat of the moment - but what was the option - delay the start of the Cup until it had all gone through proper process and it had all been totally fair to all? The point is that these guys were some of the top people in the sailing judiciary, had served at many Olympics and America's Cups, had been part of a NYSC Expert Panel which largely came down on the side of Oracle Racing in 2010. These sort of attacks and harassment place an enormous toll on their businesses and personal lives, and it is small wonder that no-one is too quick to follow in their footsteps (well, not to the best of my knowledge). For sure it is not that great for people who were found against by the Jury in 2013 and no-one is saying that they are not entitled to due process and redress if errors were made. But don't wonder why the jurists and arbitrators aren't queuing for this gig in 2015-2017. Doesn't matter how many pieces of silver are offered. It is just not worth it. |
||
![]() |
||
PeterG
Really should get out more
Joined: 12 Jan 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 823 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Oct 15 at 5:11pm |
|
|
Thanks but I don't understand. "Can't get" - why not? I cannot imagine that a suitable candidate could not be found given a suitable cheque.
They're probably worried that they might spend the rest of their lives in court if they produce a ruling one of the teams doesn't like.
|
||
|
Peter
Ex Cont 707 Ex Laser 189635 DY 59 |
||
![]() |
||
blueboy
Really should get out more
Joined: 27 Aug 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 512 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Oct 15 at 3:00pm |
|
Thanks but I don't understand. "Can't get" - why not? I cannot imagine that a suitable candidate could not be found given a suitable cheque.
They are in the entertainment business and should be grateful for any headlines they can get. I can't even think of anything particularly controversial that he's said in the current cycle. Edited by blueboy - 30 Oct 15 at 3:23pm |
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 45678 9> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |