Rule 19 question |
Post Reply
|
Page <123 |
| Author | |
Brass
Really should get out more
Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Rule 19 questionPosted: 06 Oct 15 at 5:27pm |
Sorry, haven't thought this through yet but does this rule change proposal help? http://www.sailing.org/tools/documents/17415RacingRulesofSailingRule19.1-[19546].pdf |
|
![]() |
|
Rupert
Really should get out more
Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 Oct 15 at 5:27pm |
|
Yes, a whole line of obstructions. At which point the solution is to go head to wind, sit in the bottom of the boat and cry, I believe.
|
|
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|
![]() |
|
Presuming Ed
Really should get out more
Joined: 26 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 641 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 Oct 15 at 5:34pm |
Or say to yourself "£$%$"%$£% Cowes week. What a complete *^%^$%^$%^ of a regatta. I don't know why I @:LL@L:LK:%$%$ bother."
|
|
![]() |
|
Brass
Really should get out more
Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 Oct 15 at 6:00pm |
You're welcome to cross swords with me any time. That's what discussion is all about, unlike whatever it is some people have on SA. I realize it's a welter of double negatives, but I think it's logically valid that if an obstruction does not exist at a point in time (when the running boats become overlapped), it cannot be said that one of those boats is unable to give the other room to pass the (nonexistent) obstruction, so the exclusion in rule 19.1( b ) does not apply. It's becoming increasingly apparent that rule 19 doesn't deal well with obstructions that switch on and off, and move, but it's the rule we have to live with. The rule does not consider whether the space available grows or shrinks, it directs us to consider a snapshot at the time the overlap began. It does not require us to consider anything about when boats are approaching the obstruction, regardless of what we may think makes sense. The rule does not address what boats might need to evaluate, rather it indicates facts a protest committee would need to find to decide a protest. As judges applying the rules, we shouldn't go searching after the concepts or intentions of the rules: we have to stick with the words of the rules. And rule 19 certainly doesn't say 'if you can't give room you needn't. It very specifically puts the test when the overlap began. |
|
![]() |
|
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 Oct 15 at 7:08pm |
|
My thinking was that
19.2b says, paraphrased, that if it were never possible for you to give room you needn't. 14a says, paraphrased, that if you can't avoid contact once its obvious the other boat is going to break a rule then you get exonerated. 18.2e says, paraphrased, if you can't give room to an inside boat you needn't So there's a thread going through section B/C that in various circumstances if it is absolutely not possible for a ROW boat to give room then she is not required to. But what do you make of the thought that as red is clear ahead of green, and therefore an obstruction to her as well as to blue and yellow, then as blue and yellow are overlapped with green then green is required to give blue and yellow room to pass the obstruction, but, presumably, not room to sail the course they would like? Do you end up with something like this? ![]() Edited by JimC - 06 Oct 15 at 7:40pm |
|
![]() |
|
sargesail
Really should get out more
Joined: 14 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1459 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 Oct 15 at 11:42pm |
|
Jim,
There's certainly a logic too that. What I take away though is that if I were ever faced with a situation like this I would need to act early: It's classic anticipation stuff. Take blue ahead of red. Or if blue became overlapped from clear astern take blue up and then bear away to break the overlap. Yellow could also try and create a situation where blue can't get ahead of green because of the angle of approach, and has to follwo yellow into a gybe.
|
|
![]() |
|
sargesail
Really should get out more
Joined: 14 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1459 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 Oct 15 at 11:44pm |
So in the event of a valid protest Yellow relies on 18.2 (e)?
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <123 |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |