New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Simple Racing Rules
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Simple Racing Rules

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 15161718>
Author
Chris 249 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2041
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chris 249 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Simple Racing Rules
    Posted: 19 Aug 15 at 12:45pm
Originally posted by iGRF

If there's one thing I'd like to see removed is that ghastly tactic of sailing another competitor down the fleet, never had it happen to me, but the first time I witnessed it funnily enough by an ex RYA dinghy squaddie type turned Windsurfer who then went on to be the RYA Olympic coach, it went down amongst us windsurfers like a ton of bricks and there were howls of derision, at the 1980 Windsurfer OD nationals, in order to secure a third place ffs. Very un sportsmanlike also un British in my then naive view of fair play in life. The Guy waited above the start line then sailed the other youngster down the pan, I've never had any respect for Ainslie either since watching him employ similar tactics, pathetic chicken sh*t way of getting victory in my book, rules or no rules, it totally sucks.

As to the simple rules, I think pretty much folk work out at club level what to observe and what to turn a blind eye to, as to wether we need the same rules as big boat and A/C big lawyer, big money yotters, er no we don't, what we need is a new organisation to administer small boat racing, run by enthusiasts, the way it used to be before the RYA became a corporation of jobsworths.

I watched the Ainslie/Schiedt match live from the headland and thought it was great.  It seems as legit as trying for an LBW, or covering someone normally - and exactly how does one ban it anyway?  I may add that I've never done it; too high risk for me, and in the fleets I race in the points rarely run that way.

However, I'm fairly sure that the tactic of prematurely starting to drive someone down the fleet was effectively banned around 1984, when US Finn sailor Russ Silvestri used that tactic to try win the Olympic trials.  The jury interpreted that tactic as a breach of the fair sailing rule.  Under Womble's concept, it would have probably been deemed to have been perfectly legitimate and a jolly good way to win a sailboat race. Confused


Edited by Chris 249 - 19 Aug 15 at 12:56pm
Back to Top
sargesail View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 14 Jan 06
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1459
Post Options Post Options   Quote sargesail Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Aug 15 at 12:54pm
Originally posted by PeterG

So, as implied in the various simplified codes suggested, we should scrap the precedent approach and aim to achieve as clear as possible a code that is not subject to the vagaries of individual protest outcomes. Surely anyone who has been in a protest room can see how arbitrary the process is in practice?

I doubt many would disagree in principle with that, but it ignores the reality that the "simple" rule set you quote is far less clear about exactly what is meant in each situation, and in terms of how things are defined than the existing rules (in their plain form without the cases). There's a good reason why the case law has developed over the years, even if the need for it is less than ideal, and that is that real world racing throws up a range of issues about exactly what is meant that simply don't arise when people try and throw together a set of ideal rules propping up the bar, or keyboard, until they are actually picked apart by use.

In practice of course, the issue about case law and precedence is only something that ever affects a very small number of racing incidents at the highest level, most club and open meeting sailors will never have to worry about lawyers or precedence throughout their lives, so it's not something we should get too worked up about. 

I', not sure it's about case law and precedence.  There are too many people who don't start by obtaining a thorough understanding of the definitions.  I'd say about 90% of Rules understandings miss that.

Then there is the fact, well expressed by Brass or Gordon somewhere in another thread, that most incidents do not arise from knowledge or lack of knowledge of the rules, but from the failure of boat handling to live up to the 'plan' to operate within the rules.  

I'd add to that the tendency for subsequent, conscious or unconscious shaping of the rules aspect of the incident so as to be in the right, by both parties.
Back to Top
JohnJack View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 12 Mar 13
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 246
Post Options Post Options   Quote JohnJack Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Aug 15 at 2:29pm
Originally posted by Chris 249

Originally posted by JohnJack

 I think the rules need to look at overtaking down wind. 
We are in Championship Season so all along the southcoast as we speak there is someone in the midfleet rounding the windward mark and stuffing high on the reach with a gaggle of faster boats trying to get over them.
Happens allot in Handicap racing as well. We struggle on our lake when with the kite up and trying to overtake slower Mono rigged boats they stuff us up well above the course to the next mark.
Once there is sufficient overlap the lower boat shouldn't be allowed to point further up

The rules should just be changed so the overtaking boats with their big rigs have to keep well above the slower boats. Tongue   Nothing worse than some *&^%$%$ coming past 2" to windward, blanketing you terribly, and then whining when you try to fend them off.  If they want an easy overtaking move then they should just go by two or three lengths to windward.

In some hot one design fleets I know it's accepted that when the fast guys are coming through on the reach after a bad first reach, they either go way up or way down, because no matter what class, anyone trying to come just to windward of a boat on the reach is going to get luffed.

If you are faster, stay clear!  I may add that our quickest bit of kit is the fastest or second fastest out of the 150 or so active racing boats in our city, and my slowest being a Radial which is one of the slower classes, so this POV is from someone who sees two sides of the story.

Obviously you have never sailed on a small lake where you don't have that much room.
It would make small lake sailing far less processional and a bit more interesting 
Back to Top
davidyacht View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 29 Mar 05
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1345
Post Options Post Options   Quote davidyacht Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Aug 15 at 2:58pm
Originally posted by JohnJack

 I think the rules need to look at overtaking down wind. 
We are in Championship Season so all along the southcoast as we speak there is someone in the midfleet rounding the windward mark and stuffing high on the reach with a gaggle of faster boats trying to get over them.
Happens allot in Handicap racing as well. We struggle on our lake when with the kite up and trying to overtake slower Mono rigged boats they stuff us up well above the course to the next mark.
Once there is sufficient overlap the lower boat shouldn't be allowed to point further up

Couldn't you have a rule where when the helmsman of the windward boat is in line with the mast of the leeward boat, he could hail something like "mast abeam" and the leeward boat then has to curtail the luff? ;.)
Happily living in the past
Back to Top
Presuming Ed View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 641
Post Options Post Options   Quote Presuming Ed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Aug 15 at 3:50pm
Originally posted by Wobble

 aim to achieve as clear as possible a code that is not subject to the vagaries of individual protest outcomes.

So are you saying that, for instance, room required at a leeward mark be precisely defined as no closer than, say, half a boat length. At which point, pond-based Firefly sailors think you're an idiot for needing positively acres of space, while big boat sailors at sea are cursing you because you seem intent on insisting that they wrap their toy around very large and very very rusty bits of steel, bouncing around a lot in big waves. 

Originally posted by Wobble

 Surely anyone who has been in a protest room can see how arbitrary the process is in practice?

I would argue vehemently that a properly conducted protest hearing is the very opposite of arbitrary. If you don't want a self policing sport - and AFAIAA, all these proposals are still based on a self policing sport process, then the option isn't new rules, but on the water umpiring or (next stage) refereeing. Good luck with getting club sailors to pay for that. 
Back to Top
Wobble View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 26 Jul 10
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 44
Post Options Post Options   Quote Wobble Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Aug 15 at 4:07pm
Originally posted by Chris 249

Wobbler, can you give us an example of this code that can simply and easily cover all situations?

Personally I've not found the protest room to be arbitrary, but then I've only ever been inside them about three times; once as a jury member, once as a protestee and once as a protester.  On each occasion, it got down to a simple question of fact.

Then again, I don't know many of the appeals precedents either, and don't think that they really have much impact on the sport in reality.

Sorry Chriser  Wink, but that is beyond my ability. This would be a long-term collective process. 

Re arbitrary protest outcomes... I have been around perhaps 10 in a few different classes. I think most people who serve on protest committees are totally conscientious, but I have also observed that there are different agendas in the room (not least grandstanding) and I have been surprised at the looseness of the process, both in terms of procedure, fact-finding and decision-making rationale. 

And there has been at least one reference in this discussion to the purveying of porkies in the protest room, which seems to have gone unchallenged. 

I do agree that protests realistically are all we have as a mechanism for deciding individual rule disputes. But, however honourably-intentioned, they are imperfect and should not be the basis for building law that will be applied in the future.


Edited by Wobble - 19 Aug 15 at 4:09pm
Back to Top
sargesail View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 14 Jan 06
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1459
Post Options Post Options   Quote sargesail Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Aug 15 at 4:46pm
Originally posted by Presuming Ed

Originally posted by Wobble

 aim to achieve as clear as possible a code that is not subject to the vagaries of individual protest outcomes.

So are you saying that, for instance, room required at a leeward mark be precisely defined as no closer than, say, half a boat length. At which point, pond-based Firefly sailors think you're an idiot for needing positively acres of space, while big boat sailors at sea are cursing you because you seem intent on insisting that they wrap their toy around very large and very very rusty bits of steel, bouncing around a lot in big waves. 

Originally posted by Wobble

 Surely anyone who has been in a protest room can see how arbitrary the process is in practice?

I would argue vehemently that a properly conducted protest hearing is the very opposite of arbitrary. If you don't want a self policing sport - and AFAIAA, all these proposals are still based on a self policing sport process, then the option isn't new rules, but on the water umpiring or (next stage) refereeing. Good luck with getting club sailors to pay for that. 

Well said P Ed.
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Aug 15 at 4:58pm
Originally posted by Wobble

[...and I have been surprised at the looseness of the process, both in terms of procedure, fact-finding and decision-making rationale. 


Arguably that's because most club PCs don't get enough practice to learn how to do the job properly, and are also almost invariably under time pressure.

I ran what I think was our clubs first ever arbitration hearing last week (a few hours after posting zero in the how many protest poll!!), and although I'm pretty confident I had the right answer when I reflected on it the next day I came back with a whole list of ways that I could have done it better. Some of them were mutually contradictory of course!

Originally posted by sargesail


I'd add to that the tendency for subsequent, conscious or unconscious shaping of the rules aspect of the incident so as to be in the right, by both parties.

Mmm, never, never, never underestimate the power of wishful thinking and self deception...

Edited by JimC - 19 Aug 15 at 5:01pm
Back to Top
Rupert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 04
Location: Whitefriars sc
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8956
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rupert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Aug 15 at 7:22pm
Are we looking at this all wrong again? Even the 7 rules are based on the same concepts as the RRS, using colregs as a starting point.

Why should port give way? Or even exist? Stupid, having words that only sailors really understand, and not even all of them? Why should one particular boat have to move? Easier to say that the boat that has to turn less gets out of the way. Windward leeward? Again, stupid, inaccessible terms. The boat that has to move less gets out of the way. No contact? Of course not. The boat that has to move less gets out of the way. The boats can't decide who has to move less? Simple. All the boats have been chipped. The computer tells you which, no need for judgement. Same at marks. Again "marks" "buoys" stupid, inaccessible words. We have corner markers. If the computer says you can go round first, you do.

That should keep things simple.
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
Back to Top
Presuming Ed View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 641
Post Options Post Options   Quote Presuming Ed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Aug 15 at 7:32pm
Like Bermuda fitted dinghy rules. AIUI, no port/starboard. If you can't cross (on either tack), hail & both boats must tack. Probably only works in small fleets. 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 15161718>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy