Laser 161752 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Simple Racing Rules |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 15161718> |
Author | |||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 19 Aug 15 at 12:45pm |
||
I watched the Ainslie/Schiedt match live from the headland and thought it was great. It seems as legit as trying for an LBW, or covering someone normally - and exactly how does one ban it anyway? I may add that I've never done it; too high risk for me, and in the fleets I race in the points rarely run that way. However, I'm fairly sure that the tactic of prematurely starting to drive someone down the fleet was effectively banned around 1984, when US Finn sailor Russ Silvestri used that tactic to try win the Olympic trials. The jury interpreted that tactic as a breach of the fair sailing rule. Under Womble's concept, it would have probably been deemed to have been perfectly legitimate and a jolly good way to win a sailboat race.
![]() Edited by Chris 249 - 19 Aug 15 at 12:56pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
sargesail ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1459 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I', not sure it's about case law and precedence. There are too many people who don't start by obtaining a thorough understanding of the definitions. I'd say about 90% of Rules understandings miss that. Then there is the fact, well expressed by Brass or Gordon somewhere in another thread, that most incidents do not arise from knowledge or lack of knowledge of the rules, but from the failure of boat handling to live up to the 'plan' to operate within the rules. I'd add to that the tendency for subsequent, conscious or unconscious shaping of the rules aspect of the incident so as to be in the right, by both parties.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
JohnJack ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 12 Mar 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 246 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Obviously you have never sailed on a small lake where you don't have that much room. It would make small lake sailing far less processional and a bit more interesting
|
|||
![]() |
|||
davidyacht ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1345 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Couldn't you have a rule where when the helmsman of the windward boat is in line with the mast of the leeward boat, he could hail something like "mast abeam" and the leeward boat then has to curtail the luff? ;.)
|
|||
Happily living in the past
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Presuming Ed ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 26 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 641 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
So are you saying that, for instance, room required at a leeward mark be precisely defined as no closer than, say, half a boat length. At which point, pond-based Firefly sailors think you're an idiot for needing positively acres of space, while big boat sailors at sea are cursing you because you seem intent on insisting that they wrap their toy around very large and very very rusty bits of steel, bouncing around a lot in big waves.
I would argue vehemently that a properly conducted protest hearing is the very opposite of arbitrary. If you don't want a self policing sport - and AFAIAA, all these proposals are still based on a self policing sport process, then the option isn't new rules, but on the water umpiring or (next stage) refereeing. Good luck with getting club sailors to pay for that.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Wobble ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 26 Jul 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 44 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() Re arbitrary protest outcomes... I have been around perhaps 10 in a few different classes. I think most people who serve on protest committees are totally conscientious, but I have also observed that there are different agendas in the room (not least grandstanding) and I have been surprised at the looseness of the process, both in terms of procedure, fact-finding and decision-making rationale. And there has been at least one reference in this discussion to the purveying of porkies in the protest room, which seems to have gone unchallenged. I do agree that protests realistically are all we have as a mechanism for deciding individual rule disputes. But, however honourably-intentioned, they are imperfect and should not be the basis for building law that will be applied in the future.
Edited by Wobble - 19 Aug 15 at 4:09pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
sargesail ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1459 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Well said P Ed.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Arguably that's because most club PCs don't get enough practice to learn how to do the job properly, and are also almost invariably under time pressure. I ran what I think was our clubs first ever arbitration hearing last week (a few hours after posting zero in the how many protest poll!!), and although I'm pretty confident I had the right answer when I reflected on it the next day I came back with a whole list of ways that I could have done it better. Some of them were mutually contradictory of course!
Mmm, never, never, never underestimate the power of wishful thinking and self deception... Edited by JimC - 19 Aug 15 at 5:01pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Are we looking at this all wrong again? Even the 7 rules are based on the same concepts as the RRS, using colregs as a starting point.
Why should port give way? Or even exist? Stupid, having words that only sailors really understand, and not even all of them? Why should one particular boat have to move? Easier to say that the boat that has to turn less gets out of the way. Windward leeward? Again, stupid, inaccessible terms. The boat that has to move less gets out of the way. No contact? Of course not. The boat that has to move less gets out of the way. The boats can't decide who has to move less? Simple. All the boats have been chipped. The computer tells you which, no need for judgement. Same at marks. Again "marks" "buoys" stupid, inaccessible words. We have corner markers. If the computer says you can go round first, you do. That should keep things simple. |
|||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Presuming Ed ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 26 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 641 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Like Bermuda fitted dinghy rules. AIUI, no port/starboard. If you can't cross (on either tack), hail & both boats must tack. Probably only works in small fleets.
|
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 15161718> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |