Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 161752 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Multi-rig racing |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 23> |
Author | ||||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 20 Mar 15 at 12:44pm |
|||
I think the SJ events require a published number, or did a couple of years back?
|
||||
![]() |
||||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
I hope not. It defeats one of the objects of the PYS scheme if people ban boats which don't have a published number. The statement that doing so is against the purpose of the scheme seems to have dropped off the guidance docs at some stage, but they do make it clear that the published numbers are an aid for a club to compile its own list, not a straightjacket. I just did a quick google for "published handicap" "sailing instructions" site:uk and although I didn't get much back I got a few sets of club SIs which explained what they would do if a boat didn't have a published number, but none that said entry would be disallowed. Edited by JimC - 20 Mar 15 at 12:32pm |
||||
![]() |
||||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
It seems self evident to me that if a race is run under RRS (which is 99.999% of all the racing that we on here do) then the RRS apply, whether that be a single class fleet race or a multi-clas race.
For many classes you don't have to be a member of the CA to be class legal, it's just that you do if want to race in a CA arranged event. Seems fair enough to me. If you make your own class up to 'allow' one hull with different class rigs to compete then a. you won't have a published PY which would preclude you from many events and b. you would have no rules (unless you go to the effort of creating some, without infringing the IPR of the classes you are ripping off) so literally anything would be eligible in your class. |
||||
![]() |
||||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Like I said, an interesting assertion, but do you have any evidence or sources to back it up?
RRS 87, and even more RRS78 seem to be quite difficult rules for those of us who like playing with boats, but if you're going to blithely say they don't apply when the clear text of the rules says they do you do need a bit more than a bare assertion or an "of course that's what it must mean". Edited by JimC - 20 Mar 15 at 12:11pm |
||||
![]() |
||||
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
It should state who is eleigible in NoR. The classes to race. So if it says 470 class, 470 class rules apply and cannot be changed. If it says IRC, with a rating band, IRC rules apply. So you can stiick your assy or masthead kite on your erstwhile One design and race under a different yardstick. If it says PY, it usually says something like any boat with a published number or words to that effect. Which effectively means you have to keep to the boat class rules in order to race under that number. But tens of thousands don't join the CA... |
||||
![]() |
||||
jeffers ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Agreed, it applies to any race that is run under the RRS as a boat must be class rule compliant. As for the self adjusting comment it may mean the 10.2 is undult handicapped as fast if people swap down when it is windy (or sail as an RS100 8.4). This is the issue the Rooster 8.1 faces but as the PY is based on published results this will happen.
|
||||
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
||||
![]() |
||||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
An interesting assertion, but where in the RRS (or anywhere else) does it say that? |
||||
![]() |
||||
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
I thought the local self adjustment of PY was supposed to work? If so why won't it cope with this? The RRS-not changing class rules only applies in class races. In yardstick racing whether it's PY, IRC or IMS, you can race your production boat in any configuration you care to, provided the handicapping authority is prepared to issue a handicap. I'd guess the majority of boats racing PY are no-class anyway, as the sailors aren't in the CA..... |
||||
![]() |
||||
jeffers ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
But then the club could always create a local class, call it RS100whocarewhatsailyouuse and say it had all the class rules as the RS100 class except you may swap between the 10.2 and 8.4 sail freely. The same could be done for the Aero (and the Zero and the Laser). The flip side is that they would need to decide on a suitable PY....(but that is another matter)
|
||||
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
||||
![]() |
||||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
thanks for the clarity... and point taken.
|
||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 23> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |