Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Rule 17 situation |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 23456> |
Author | ||
rb_stretch ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 23 Aug 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 742 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 22 Dec 14 at 8:25pm |
|
To some extent it is that, that causes the problem. It always seems to be that the most confusing situations for all are when Right of Way changes in rapid succession, which is exactly what happens when overtaking. Curiously IRPCS rule 13 is specifically about overtaking and on the sea IRPCS take precedence over RRS, which makes this even more confusing. It is probably why I got confused because I've owned cruising boats for over 10 years, which is more time than I have raced dinghies. |
||
![]() |
||
Lukepiewalker ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 May 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1341 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Boats are either clear ahead, clear astern, or overlapped. There is no concept of overtaking (although apparently windsurfers still have it)
Edited by Lukepiewalker - 22 Dec 14 at 8:15pm |
||
Ex-Finn GBR533 "Pie Hard"
Ex-National 12 3253 "Seawitch" Ex-National 12 2961 "Curved Air" Ex-Mirror 59096 "Voodoo Chile" |
||
![]() |
||
Do Different ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 26 Jan 12 Location: North Online Status: Offline Posts: 1312 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I fully expect this question to attract mass derision but here goes.
I thought that there was a general requirement for an overtaking boat to keep clear. When overtaking, especially in a handicap fleet I always go around people. Smaller boats with little wind shadow I generally go well below then come back up when clear ahead, bigger stuff FFs Wayfarers, if possible go well above out of luffing range. No Longer? Edited by Do Different - 22 Dec 14 at 8:08pm |
||
![]() |
||
rb_stretch ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 23 Aug 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 742 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Jim, agree with your thinking that it is preferable to encourage boats to go to leeward as it fits better with overtaking boats staying clear and not interfering with the slower boat.
99% of the time there is little need for this level of attention to Rule 17 as circumstances suggest a less intense interaction is better for both parties. This discussion has been worth it for me personally to create my own simplified rule given I wasn't entirely clear until the situation arose. And my simplification is to ignore rule 17 for handicap racing and just assume leeward boat has rights. Proving anything else seems pretty much impossible. |
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Its tricky though. At club level if you get a reputation for protecting your wind people will pass to leeward if they are faster, and often do it with minimal disturbance, which normally we want to encourage.
But if you get a reputation for aggressively protecting in both directions then there is no motivation for anyone to attempt to pass you with minimal disturbance, anything will do. But the complication in this case is that in spite of the boats having different upwind and downwind speeds, the aggregate handicap is such that they are racing level, so they are effectively racing for a place on the water... But overall I think its probably reasonable that the rules make it much more difficult to prevent a boat passing to leeward than to windward. |
||
![]() |
||
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Proper course is the ONLY point of rule 17. If you are in a rule 17 situation, then keep clear and protest the other boat for breaking rule 17.
|
||
![]() |
||
rb_stretch ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 23 Aug 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 742 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
On the first point above, you've just confirmed that the proper course part of rule 17 is in effect useless as any protection of the boat just being undertaken. Makes you wonder why we bother with that part of rule 17. On the second point, the issue is that most UK club racing is done in mixed handicap fleets on short inland courses where the inherent differences in different classes can make it very worthwhile to have a luffing match. Otherwise you just get rolled by one boat after another, been there and it isn't fun. On sea courses with plenty of room then it doesn't make sense.
|
||
![]() |
||
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
||
![]() |
||
rb_stretch ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 23 Aug 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 742 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Brass, thanks for your thoughts on this. Your summary is the revised viewpoint that I will take from now on - just assume that the overtaking leeward boat has rights, so don't let them go below you.
However this clarification (given the balance of favour if a protest was to happen) does in effect, give carte blanche to faster boats to dip to leeward, hot up and call the slower boat up to get through the wind shadow. Perhaps not what the rules intended, but how the rules are interpreted in reality. Will make some interesting cat and mouse between a slightly faster asymmetric and slow two-sail symmetric boat on a reach.
|
||
![]() |
||
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 23456> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |