Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Is the Cadet finished? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 45678 17> |
Author | |
Null ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 May 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 745 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 08 Sep 14 at 11:50am |
Graeme, i agree with some of what you are saying. However you always seem to think making something lighter makes it better. Whilst this can be the case in some sports i don't think this is always the best case in a sailing dinghy. First of all something that is really light, runs the risk of being dangerous if the crew get separated from the boat. Also the lighter the boat, generally the twitchier it becomes which means its window of development for young crews is narrower. I do think there is scope to change some of the old fashion rule sets, that exist in our sport. Classes are scared stiff of upsetting Joe Bloggs by reducing minimum weights and making his 30 year old boat uncompetitive, in my mind i think this hold back new and used boat sales. However i think making something ridiculously light changes so many other characteristics of what makes a dinghy a dinghy that there is a compromise. To my mind the Feva is not far off right, proof is also in the pudding! Just look at the numbers! I understand as a relative newcomer to the sport and given your background your view point. I happen to agree with much of it. I never understood why boats like the Cadet keep flourishing when even as a kid they looked awful to me. In order to install a change the very foundations of the sport need shaking up. Sadly i don't think it will ever happen. Given the size sailings infrastructure on a global level. I guess the only way to push the sport in new directions is how its already set up! Challenger vs Champion classes, if designers and manufacturers keep developing newer options the market should dictate what's better. So given there is such a large market (it seems from Mirror, Cadet and Feva numbers) why don't more builders start developing more modern alternatives to try and topple the champion classes? i suspect even if they did, they would not be as light as an Aero or Zero, nor would you find them particularly cool to look at!
|
|
![]() |
|
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Er nothing can be too light, why? because you can always add corrector weights, stuff you take out when you're humping it about, I agree if it's so light it'll break, I guess beach life exacerbates the problem, I've just watched a weekend of Snipe Humping, I noticed they do at least crane that heavy chunk of metal out of the boat before they set about humping it around..
|
|
![]() |
|
getafix ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Mar 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2143 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A stalemate:
A governing body that won't organise a competitive process to select a successor to the xxxxxx, xxxxx and xxxx because they court the money and favours of the people involved in those classes and fear the backlash vs A group of manufacturers who won't commit the resources to start something new, due to the risk it won't be adopted by the national body ... one might put it like that anyhow, irrespective of weight, design aesthetics, tri-axial carbon laminates, mylar vs dacron and other popular topics .....
|
|
![]() |
|
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Feva was already popular when the RYA picked up on it, not the other way round, as was the Topper, Laser and Mirror. The times when the RYA has made the 1st move, you get the 405, for example. The Cadet was a private venture, but not sure how soon it was picked up in that case.
So, who leads? The RYA, IASF, the builders? No, we do, the sailors. Edited by Rupert - 08 Sep 14 at 12:28pm |
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|
![]() |
|
johnreekie1980 ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 11 Jun 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 91 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I was at a event at Loch Lomond at the weekend and witnessed 4 kids out in Optimists having a right royal laugh. On Saturday they seemed to race off the main course round a load of yachts with a rib directing the weaker sailors. On Sunday they joined us on the big course and they appeared to even know basic rules such as Port and Starboard. I did not hear any of them say I wish I had a faster and therefore more tippy, fragile and overpowered boat.
I took my 3 year old out in a fibreglass mirror the other month for his first dinghy sail and thought it was a very sensible boat. Powerful enough for 1 small adult to control regardless of the what the crew is doing as at three they have a short attention span. The raised outer edge makes the kids feel secure. As for it being heavy it certainly did not feel heavy to me. With the new mast the rig even looks fine. You cannot get away from physics and whilst a Musto Skiff is a good laugh it does not scale down well to the junior market as it is either too fragile, too tippy or too scary or simply does not suit small people. When kids are learning they are unlikely to travel far to compete and therefore the best advice any club could have is to promote a few classes that have a local history to get the kids sailing against each other and therefore improving. |
|
![]() |
|
Medway Maniac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes you're right, Rupert. The 405 was, for me, the pick of the bunch in the trials, and not a bad boat, but failed to catch on -despite Hobie backing.
|
|
![]() |
|
ohFFsake ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 04 Sep 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 219 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think there are two separate issues here. The first is which is the best two handed boat for the (insert name of national association) to promote as their "pathway" class to develop future 470/29er/49er sailors. But I think the underlying second question is why are so few children sailing two handed boats these days? I'm aware the situation isn't quite so acute in the south, but up here in Cumbria there are no proper fleets of two handed boats racing at any club I can think of. The general training pathway for kids is usually Oppi or Tera into Topper into Laser 4.7 and then "whatever". We seem to have a system that produces a lot of competent sailors who are used to racing in big fleets, but they always sail singlehanded. I'd say that when they move into 29ers the biggest problem is not learning how to sail a fast, tippy boat with an assymetric, it's learning how to communicate with another crew member for the first time, and how not to fall out with them on the days when everything is going pear-shaped. This is further exarcebated by the fact that the crew has probably spent the last ten years progressing via the same route as a single-handed helm and is perhaps occupying that role with some degree of pragmatic reluctance. Meanwhile, all the kids with a natural leaning towards being more of a "team player" tend to get disenfranchised with the sport much, much earlier when they find that the only training path available is as a single-handed helm. For example our kids have sailed in Mirrors for a while now but the only time they ever sail in a fleet is during squad training or at regional championship events. The rest of the time the way to sail in a fleet is to jump in a Topper instead. My youngest daughter gave up sailing as she didn't want to helm and that was the only option available. We then changed clubs and she started crewing in a Mirror and loved it. So if we can think about how to restore that balance a bit, and encourage more kids to take up the sport like we did, ie as something they do sociably with a friend, then perhaps the first question would answer itself, as all three classes would have loads more support. Eldest daughter has spent much of this summer transitioning from Mirror to 29er and I honestly don't think the lack of assymetric experience was an issue. Of course a lot of swimming has been involved but that seems to be a rite of passage and I can't really see that a different feeder boat would have shortened the learning time. The nearest is the RS200 but the 29er is still such a totally different proposition that it's like learning to sail all over again! As it is the learning curve was very steep but she came up it fast because she's used to working as a team and laughing when it all goes wrong! What is interesting is that even she is competent in the 29er and looking forward to racing it, she still wants to continue sailing the Mirror because the regattas are such good events and the boats are a lot of fun when there's a breeze on. The bottom line is that in enough breeze any boat feels fast. So what kids need is a boat they can quickly become confident to sail in big breezes when it feels fast. Boats like the Mirror build confidence so a couple of keen 10 year olds soon get confident to sail it in strong breezes and achieve mastery of it. Put them in a "mini-skiff" and they'd be ashore every time it was over F3
|
|
![]() |
|
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As parents we know whats best eh?
I had exactly an incident this very weekend, day two of the snipes, we were using their go as our five so i was out there in the EPS scoping the start. Genna and Lorna were racing, the line had a Port Bias and the likelihood was that they'd line up on Starboard to get away, but, the tide was running right to left, so much so I'd rightly guessed that in the light wind if she'd gone last into the line up then back doored the committee boat end, she'd have lee bowed the tide all the way up anyone who'd gone left on starboard would likely have to free off by the time they tacked for the mark, exactly a situation where getting the lee bow right works. So I quietly called her over, pointed it out to her, did she pay any attention? No, there were two boys down the other end clearly more interesting as they'd obviously more enjoyed dicking around match racing each other down the back of the fleet, other than joshing with her I haven't laboured the point, she was having fun, they had their own thing going on. The moral of the tale? Don't make winning a condition of racing, it isn't always essential for kids they have other things going on. The number of times over the years I've seen parents yelling at kids for not doing this or that, bad news, kids get upset, parents get upset, not at all what this should be about. If the 'friends' are part of the enjoyment then so be it, clearly there had been some sort of youth event that Genna had won earlier because she got something for it at the prize giving and the grown ups race was a chance to just have fun and dick about, it doesn't matter, they are there, that's what matters. Edited by iGRF - 08 Sep 14 at 1:28pm |
|
![]() |
|
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Jack wrote "In effect all SMOD builders do (RS, Laser, Topper) is cannibalise a market."
With respect, from some perspectives it's the other way around - many SMOD builders are the ones who seem to create boats that bring new people into the sport, while many classes just keep on making their boats more expensive and difficult to sail and own and therefore keep beginners away. You're dead right, IMHO, that was is needed is a concentration on growing the sport rather than just grabbing more of a dwindling pie. One of the reasons I've moved back to SMODs is because some of them seem to do that well, and I like to support them in that endeavour. Getafix wrote "This is why I dislike the choice of things like the Laser and 49erFX so much, because they reflected vested interests, IMPO, rather than a view for the growth and development of the sport." But given the enormous number of Lasers out there and the way the class worldwide has performed in terms of being a focus for new areas and new sailors, how can the Laser be seen to have harmed the growth or development of the sport? The sectors of the sport that has the Laser and similar SMODs are doing much better than sectors that don't, so where is the evidence that the Laser is bad for the sport? The two-person trap segment has largely been left to those traditional "open source" one designs and development classes and it's doing pretty poorly so that model seems to be failing in some ways. And who are those behind the 49erFX "vested interests" and are they worth any more than those behind other skiff types?? How much money do people like the 49erFX's backers have to court ISAF with? Julian didn't have a Lear Jet and superyacht last time I looked..... ![]() JohnReekie wrote; "You cannot get away from physics and whilst a Musto Skiff is a good laugh it does not scale down well to the junior market as it is either too fragile, too tippy or too scary or simply does not suit small people." Great post but you can do a trainer like a scaled down MPS, as the Flying Ant and JD prove. Which is not to say that such boats are better than Fevas, Mirrors, or Cadets; just different boats for different places and people, IMHO. I come from a "skiff trainer" background but I really wish my club still had a strong Mirror fleet because it would seem to be a real asset. In a sport that has so many fascinating facets, from light-wind roll tacking duels in identical Lasers to trying to work out the installation of a new Canoe seat or the lamination of the mast step on the cruiser, how can we say that any boat is bad or wrong for other people in other situations to enjoy? Edited by Chris 249 - 08 Sep 14 at 1:57pm |
|
![]() |
|
MerlinMags ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 19 Mar 04 Location: UK, Guildford Online Status: Offline Posts: 588 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Actually I thought the graph was indicating good health in all those classes; nowhere near dropping out of '50+ club' that indicates a successful adult class. And I don't think the trends have been going on long enough to call them a trend yet. Obviously the Cadet and Mirror numbers have to suffer a bit as the Feva expands, as there's probably (roughly) the same number of kids sailing in the UK overall. Thinking back to my days in the Cadet has made me realise one important point: I wouldn't have wanted to go sailing if I was scared, or felt I couldn't control the boat. Giving me a faster/twitchier boat would have put me off. I know some kids are gung-ho and brave, but there's plenty of wimps out there too, probably accounting for 75% or more of the fleet. A 54kg Cadet which doesn't wobble like crazy, and steers solidly, is a good option to keep the kids smiling (and not retiring) in a greater range of wind strengths. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 45678 17> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |