Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
New Singlehanders: PYs |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 345 |
Author | ||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 21 May 14 at 1:41pm |
|
All you people are asking for is what I've been saying for ages. SDHRS system, form a bloody group create a website and be done with it.
|
||
![]() |
||
kneewrecker ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Apr 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1586 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
No, I want an EN, using the system that has served inter-class club level dinghy sailing well.
I'm just interested in the path to generating that EN, and whom is best placed to pony up the first iteration.
|
||
![]() |
||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
So, what you are looking for is an educated guess with which to start the ball rolling in one place for the clubs?
Of course, once this guess is proved wrong (either up or down) by actual returns, then will start the whinging either by the sailors of the class if it goes down, or the sailors of other boats if it goes up, from the entirely fictional original number. Also of course, the same will happen if clubs pick a number and the returns come back way out from the number the club has been using based on its own observations, so you can't really win either way. At least now the PYAG are using actual results, the reality sets in a little more quickly than it used to. |
||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
But should you attempt to capture that sort of thing? A few years ago I think I'd have probably said that PY should approximate to what the performance would be of identically prepared new boats sailed by equally skilled sailors in an average of all wind conditions and an average of all courses and sea conditions. Now I'm coming to think that maybe if owners of class A only sail them in light conditions on rivers, and owners of class B only sail them in breeze on open water, then maybe its good that the observed performance handicap reflects that, because might that not be a fairer handicap for "the best sailor wins on the day" against class C which is sailed everywhere when class A sails against class C on the river, and class B sails against class C on Weymouth bay. And if every boat remaining in class D is clapped out and soft and slow, is it definitely wrong for the handicap to reflect that? I'm coming to think there's a lot to be said for simply reflecting what's actually seen on the water, rather than trying, especially if its by statistically dubious means, to eliminate those sorts of factors. I don't think one should be dogmatic about this stuff: there are probably nine-and-sixty was of constructing handicap racing, and probably all of them are right... |
||
![]() |
||
jeffers ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Definitely not. It is noticeable that under canvassed boats appear to get faster as the wind picks up. In reality it is more likely that boats with more sail area actually go slower. A classic example is your club Laser sailor who has full and radial rigs. when it is blowing dogs off chains they are likely to go out for a blast and will (in my experience) beat their mates who sail with a standard rig. As the Radial can be driven upwind harder in a higher wind where a full rig is much more of a handful.
|
||
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
||
![]() |
||
kneewrecker ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Apr 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1586 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
That's very true - but if the RYA somehow endorse that educated guess, even if only giving it a temporary life span of say 6 months, then it is very hard for sailors of class A to moan that NewClass B has masterminded some grand scheme to give themselves a) a bandit with soft number or b) a tough number for an international marketing campaign to prove something is quicker than a potential competitor. It's also hard for NewClass B sailors to moan as well, if the number is in someway ratified by the RYA. I have genuinely appreciated Jim's feedback here- I don't think it's too much of stretch to take what he would do for island barn and offer that up as an example of good practice, in turn use that as a PYAG informal recommendation pre EN release. Hell, why not... sounds like the perfect vehicle to reinforce the message of local adjustment if it's not working for one club or another.
Edited by kneewrecker - 21 May 14 at 2:38pm |
||
![]() |
||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I think that is exactly it. Anyone can propose a number, but until the RYA endorse it no one trusts them. That doesn't mean it becomes fixed in stone, but at least it's an officially endorsed best guess, rather than a marketing gimmick or vested note rest of a committee member. And at least with a regression analysis estimate there is a semblance of objectivity to that initial best guess.
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 345 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |