Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Symmetric v Assymmeric Spinnakers |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 23456 9> |
Author | |
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 14 Aug 13 at 7:51pm |
When it comes to outrunning Merlins DDW in lightweather, I suspect what we are up against is their low wetted area, due to being narrow at the waterplane. Plus of course the raking rig, you don't have to run with the rig set up for the beat.
So I guess you are going to need to project more sail area than them. Are we talking about truly dead down wind, close to DWW or just closer than asy's normally work? I think a few yachts have been over this ground, with sprits that swivel a fair bit more than a 400 sprit. It occurs to me that the sprit on a 400 could swivel further if it were higher up where the bow is wider, but at present it is out of the way of the kite. I think the icon bow is finer, which is good, but offers less space for all this? |
|
![]() |
|
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So not big sails, not a massive kite, yet any tricks than can be deployed to out run a Merlin on a dead run whilst retaining the ability to heat it up and bang the angles if there are any worth banging. I want the kite to fire out from under the forestay, I want either the option of a swinging pole or twisting L pole or some version of that dangly pole idea if it could be deployed to swing the entry of the kite should it be necessary, given that is usually only likely to occur in light weather, that could be a bit of a techy thing. Oh and I've now got the green light so will be contacting Mike who I hope will be helping me a bit more positively than the last lot did. doh missed half the front of this post, damn forum ware playing up again.. Edited by iGRF - 14 Aug 13 at 7:18pm |
|
![]() |
|
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If I wanted to try out GRF's strongly held ideas about spinnaker pole systems, I be concentrating on that rather than modifying hulls. OTOH if the game is about light weight, I would be tempted to look at self building to have a seriously light weight. 75kg is light, but add on a spinnaker tube or extra deck and a bit of reinforcement around the mods and you're talking 'only a bit lighter than a lot of other stuff'. Of course the icon has a nice light mast, but is that going to be OK with a huge great kite on it? Carbon masts, booms, rudder stocks and foils could make a huge difference to a lot of boats all up weight. For sure a 400 is relatively weighty fully rigged, but it was spec'd about 20 years ago I think old age might be when you realise that your projects won't all be finished before you get a bus pass? Or is that middle age? But GRF should define the parameters a little better. Is he looking for a trapeze boat or not? Personally, I'm wondering where to go next and might consider a trapeze boat. But I can't convince myself I shouldn't look at a twin trap boat. I suppose there is good reason for dagger boards in fast boats, but I'm sympathetic to GRF's view here too. Personally I have clipped the bottom at speed a couple of times already this year. It's bad enough when it takes me a couple of hours of filling and sanding, I don't want to be mending the hull, and I certainly want to finish the race. |
|
![]() |
|
i tick ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 15 Jul 13 Location: Tunstead Milton Online Status: Offline Posts: 93 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Since the purpose of GRF,s project "seems" to be a boat that will sail fast while the crew wears a nice print dress, is the Icon hull not like any other fast hull, a bit tippy? What about getting a 300 hull and bolting a very small canoe under each flare. To stop it nose diving a nice swans head and neck could adorn the front.
|
|
![]() |
|
blaze720 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If GRF wants to 'have a go' what on earth is the problem ? He is not necessarily looking towards a commercial project in any event. Better to start with a sorted light hull ... than a heavy one surely. Personally I would not go for a spinnaker / trapeze because the market is possibly limited and I'd be looking at that angle .. but for my own interest and devoid of having to make a commercial case for anything beyond a one-off I'd do it myself if I had the time.
IF he does it I'll certainly want to try it as well ... you never know .. After all you only stop learning when you make a conscious decision to settle for what is 'there' already. (or is that when you just get 'too old' for really new stuff ? ... possible at any age in reality of course, and certainly not the preserve of the chronologically older ! ;-) Mike L. |
|
![]() |
|
Noah ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Dec 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 611 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The weather helm will be due to either not sailing it flat, or the Centre of Effort not being above the Centre of Lateral Resistance. You need to raise the c/b a bit when the breeze is up to keep the boat balanced. |
|
Nick
D-Zero 316 |
|
![]() |
|
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
OK, so give me the name of a wash through hull with a retracting CB that weighs under 75kgs that doesn't suffer from massive weather helm the moment it blows (Just incase you were thinking RS500) that is an assym. I've looked about, I can't see one. So I have no alternative really but to make it happen.. And yes I'd already noticed those MG14's, assumed that was pretty much what I was about to create from that Icon reject hull.. |
|
![]() |
|
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just seems pointless to me to chop about a nearly new one design boat to make a compromise prototype. Yes the Icon has a marginal weight advantage over the older options, but it's not exactly overwhelming. Also I don't think I'd want a bow tack jib with a kite, so that's more surgery. If GRF want's to prove his kite concept is better than the run of the mill, fitting it to a modified 400 would give a direct measurement against the 'state of the Ark'. Having proved the concept, then would be the time to design a really light hull around it. Regarding box rules and all that, a lot depends on how narrow at the waterline you are prepared to go. One thing Icon did get right, as with the 400 was to push the length up a bit from 14ft. How long is your garage? |
|
![]() |
|
alstorer ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
the "single trapeze two man boat for lightweights" is not exactly an underserved part of the market...
|
|
-_
Al |
|
![]() |
|
Jack Sparrow ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2965 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What you mean like this... that is an NS14 with an Assy and has been around your donkeys years! MG14 LINK ![]() Edit: PS - Landenberger tried to launch it in Europe some years ago and it didn't take off Edited by Jack Sparrow - 14 Aug 13 at 11:08am |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 23456 9> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |