New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Symmetric v Assymmeric Spinnakers
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Symmetric v Assymmeric Spinnakers

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 9>
Author
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Symmetric v Assymmeric Spinnakers
    Posted: 13 Aug 13 at 11:12pm
Thing is though a rig with diamonds like the Tasar just doesn't need the sort of rig tension a boat with spreaders requires.
Back to Top
blaze720 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1635
Post Options Post Options   Quote blaze720 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 13 at 10:52pm
Hi iTick

Simple answer to your question - No Icon is not like that... light 50mm carbon non-rotating mast compared to (amazingly) heavy 2 piece rotating alloy mast (ie that must have low rig tension to rotate in the first place)  ... and Icons hull is built accordingly.

Mike L.

 


Edited by blaze720 - 13 Aug 13 at 10:54pm
Back to Top
i tick View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 15 Jul 13
Location: Tunstead Milton
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 93
Post Options Post Options   Quote i tick Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 13 at 10:33pm
Tasar 68 kg (hull). Mind you the rig carries no tension and has floppy shrouds. Start putting tension on and it would probably need strengthening =weight. Is the Icon not like that?

I really must sort out my Tasar and get it sold.
Back to Top
blaze720 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1635
Post Options Post Options   Quote blaze720 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 13 at 10:32pm
The weight addition to put a chute in an Icon hull would be nominal....  it would be light enough in either mode to be interesting.  All up weight would still be plenty light enough.  Commercially we are not about to launch a spinnaker version unless we had a very good reason (we think it is unique in what it offers already) but if GRF wants to try it for kicks we do not have any real  problem and would follow his development with (neutral) interest.   The reason we do not to want to currently develop a 3 sail version is that we believe there are a multitude of goodish hiking spinnaker offerings out there already..

Now a derivative with a modest asymetric and a single trapeze ...... well that might be a bit more interesting !   well one day maybe  ;-)     ... but it would not be an Icon of course.  

Mike L.

PS ... '400' you seem interested in suggesting every possible way BUT trying  out an Icon hull... why ? and why not try one out first ?   Have you even seen one on the water ?  It is very very efficient indeed, does not require a lot of sail to go rather fast and is dead 'easy' with brilliant handling.  We looked at developing a MR inspired derivative when the project started ourselves but the NS had/has offered a much 'cleaner' hull as a starting point .. in our opinion at least.   There has been design convergence across both these classes, half a world apart, as you would expect but the 'free' NS 'box rule' arguably permitted a lot more design freedom for just about 50 years of experimentation and development.    


Edited by blaze720 - 13 Aug 13 at 10:47pm
Back to Top
laser193713 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 13 May 09
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 889
Post Options Post Options   Quote laser193713 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 13 at 10:19pm
Originally posted by RS400atC


.Alternatively, build a carbon copy of an RS400 hull?


Not sure RS would be too happy with this! Consult your IP lawyer first!
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 13 at 8:57pm
Hull weight on an i14 is about 75kg, old ones a bit more. They probably have some lead you can remove though.
Don't stick a Tasar rig on it, I have a hardly used NS14 rig sitting in my garage if you really want a wing masted rig.
Back to Top
RS400atC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Dec 08
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3011
Post Options Post Options   Quote RS400atC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 13 at 8:36pm
Originally posted by iGRF

Half the reason I'm looking at this is weight, we want something that the two of us can lift onto a trailer have you tried lifting an RS400 without a crane?


An Icon weighs allegedly about 75kg bare hull.
By the time you've added a chute and reinforced to cope with the pole loads, it won't be much lighter than the 400. Which, equally allegedly, weighs 85kg bare hull.
Perhaps what you want is a Merlin, where the 98kg includes the centreboard, 17 furlongs of string and half a church roof? Lose the excess and you've got a lightweight hull with plenty of righting power....

If lightness is everything, why not look for an outdated Inter 14 hull?
There was one on eBay for next to nothing a while back.

Alternatively, build a carbon copy of an RS400 hull?

I'd like something lighter too, but other than making some lighter racks for a B14, I'm not sure of the best way forwards.
Back to Top
boatshed View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 12 Apr 05
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
Post Options Post Options   Quote boatshed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 13 at 8:34pm
Also, in the Uk a lot of sailing is done inland and often in shifty, lightish winds.    A square running boat and deep by the lee Laser type boat will dispatch the run in sub planing conditions pretty efficiently.    Trying to soak low in any asymmetric - fast or slow - is painful.

The boats that I see suffer on the dead runs are the stayed rig single handers.   Canoes and Contenders and to some extent Solos ( but they have very floppy rigs).  They can't get the boom out and don't have the extra sail area of a whopping great symmetric kite.

So, the perfect boat for the UK with it's shifty, lightish summer winds is a single hander with a symmetric kite !  

Joking aside, in around 8 knots + a quick asymm skiff will hammer any square running boat to the bottom mark.   Even a Vortex can be quick.
Steve
Back to Top
iGRF View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 07 Mar 11
Location: Hythe
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6499
Post Options Post Options   Quote iGRF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 13 at 7:35pm
Tasars are quite light anyway aren't they, I saw one down the lake the other week and helped them onto the trailer when they came down to Hythe, weight isn't a problem when you have lakes and slipways to float the boat on and off a trailer, but beach sailing it's all about picking the bloody thing up and putting it physically on the trailer.

I won't be 'cutting' holes, the plan is to fit one of those Fireball style kite pipe things into it and to do it professionally, with a floor in the bow and those vents in the nose to clear any water that goes down the chute opening.
Back to Top
i tick View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 15 Jul 13
Location: Tunstead Milton
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 93
Post Options Post Options   Quote i tick Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 13 at 7:14pm
Oh, don't chop holes in it, we could stick a Tasar rig on it.................
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 9>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy