New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Dinghy popularity
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Dinghy popularity

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1314151617 38>
Author
RS400atC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Dec 08
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3011
Post Options Post Options   Quote RS400atC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Dinghy popularity
    Posted: 28 Jun 13 at 4:09pm
Selling a new class is always going to be hard.
The market is distorted by the way most people get into a class via used boats.
That way, a lot of people don't see £11k for a new 400, they bought a used one 3 years ago, are committed to the class so they trade up for perhaps half the headline price, getting as far up the fleet as they ever will. If you look at the price as being the cost of doing rather than the cost of having, it is what you pay for however many events you hope to do.
With a new class, you seem to get all of the cost and very few events, so each event looks very pricey.
Even if someone jumps into a class like say the Merlins, paying £15k for a new boat with trailers and covers, the depreciation is quite reasonable as a four year old one will be the thick end of £10k or more if it's got lots of sails.

The icon specifically I suspect suffers from too little beam for righting moment in proportion to its sail area. Couple with a dangly pole which makes crewing it just as technical as sailing with a kite, only more subtle. Only seen them at the HISC perisher, where I was not blown away by the performance, given that the course should have suited a 2-rag boat.
It's a nice looking boat, but apart from the carbon stick, it is something that could have been built last century.
The dangly makes it a 5/10 on the 'simplify' and its 2/10 on the 'add lightness' IMHO.
It also fails because boat-on-boat, there's nothing to race it against except perhaps an Albacore.

Stick a kite on one, you'd have a less developed alternative to the 59er. With the same need for a trapeze. Maybe if you went symmetric, but then it would just look like a Scorpion for bigger people.

What boat is going to bring in new people to the sport? Well maybe the RS Venture might have the heavy marketing to reach out to the poor souls who read too many magazines or go to boat shows and can't afford a Bennytoe.
But I think there is more to be gained selling the activity rather than the possession.
In the same way that groups of people from the office go Karting on mickey-mouse tracks in old warehouses, or Scuba in the pool, maybe there is a market for getting people doing some very basic sailing, no experience assumed?

If I'm talking to a non participant about Scuba, and they show an interest, I can suggest they go to Andark for £10 (? it was a while ago!) they get an amusing evening 's try-dive.
If they express an interest in sailing, what do you do? Sorry mate, my boat's a bit hyperformance to take fat beginners for a ride....
Back to Top
iGRF View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 07 Mar 11
Location: Hythe
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6499
Post Options Post Options   Quote iGRF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jun 13 at 4:20pm
Originally posted by RS400atC

Sorry mate, my boat's a bit hyperformance to take fat beginners for a ride....



And there you have the essence of what I'm saying, can't remember the percentage, but back in the day lots of folk entered windsurfing via their friends letting them 'have a go', so either they get to have a go in a beginner hulk or not because your boat is too <insert appropriate reason from the following list> Ugly difficult wooden complicated...

As to the Icon my plan would be kite and single trap to help my 1st year entry level crew continue on his winning streak without having to worry about the boat filling up with water and sinking (that kind of puts new folk off).

Edited by iGRF - 28 Jun 13 at 4:21pm
Back to Top
RS400atC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Dec 08
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3011
Post Options Post Options   Quote RS400atC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jun 13 at 4:55pm
Originally posted by iGRF

Originally posted by RS400atC

Sorry mate, my boat's a bit hyperformance to take fat beginners for a ride....



And there you have the essence of what I'm saying, can't remember the percentage, but back in the day lots of folk entered windsurfing via their friends letting them 'have a go', so either they get to have a go in a beginner hulk or not because your boat is too <insert appropriate reason from the following list> Ugly difficult wooden complicated...

As to the Icon my plan would be kite and single trap to help my 1st year entry level crew continue on his winning streak without having to worry about the boat filling up with water and sinking (that kind of puts new folk off).


Frankly, I personally am not much disposed to taking beginners out.
I'd rather direct them to a trained coach with the people skills and teaching ability to make a proper job of it.
I'm more likely to put them off.
I wouldn't want beginners to be in a boat they had to worry about scratching, and I don't want to race a boat that's been beaten up by beginners.
We have endless choice of boats.
Not only do they come in all shapes and sizes, but there are boats around, paid for by lottery money doing sweet FA 167 hours a week.
What we lack is the trainers and infrastructure to make something happen, or maybe there is little market for it?
When did you last see 'try sailing' advertised to the wider world?
Back to Top
RS400atC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Dec 08
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3011
Post Options Post Options   Quote RS400atC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jun 13 at 5:04pm
Originally posted by iGRF

....
As to the Icon my plan would be kite and single trap to help my 1st year entry level crew continue on his winning streak without having to worry about the boat filling up with water and sinking (that kind of puts new folk off).

So it will be a.n. other boat, apart from the pivoting centreboard, how will it be better than a 29er/L4K/iso/Buzz etc?
If the centreboard is really the killer feature, why not slap a trapeze on a 400?

Come to that, why single trapeze? If trapezing is in the equation why not the helm?

Rig wise, how big a kite? rest of it same as icon?
Assume you mean asy?

Don't mean to sound anti, just lots of ....why?

Back to Top
dkr1 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 15 Jun 10
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 23
Post Options Post Options   Quote dkr1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jun 13 at 5:04pm

When did you last see 'try sailing' advertised to the wider world?
Try here



Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jun 13 at 5:11pm
Originally posted by RS400atC

...The icon specifically I suspect suffers from too little beam for righting moment in proportion to its sail area.

...The dangly makes it a 5/10 on the 'simplify' and its 2/10 on the 'add lightness' IMHO.It also fails because boat-on-boat, there's nothing to race it


Just to address those points, the Icon has a beam of 1.94m, the whole length of the cockpit. The sail area is 10.2 + 3.2 = 14.4 from memory.
The 400 has a beam of 2.00m (max, but reduces aft) and a sail area of 14.8, so the ratios are pretty much the same. Not sure how tall the 400 mast is, but must be similar, and the Icon main will twist off before the 400 one.
The dangly pole is very simple, and certainly less likely to cause f**k ups compared to launching, gybing, retrieving an asymmetric kite. And if you sail on a lake not really suited to using kites, the dangly pole is worthy means of adding turbo.
Weight wise, IIRC the Icon is about 87-90kg all up, compared to a 400 at 129kg and even the 200 is 114kg. A N12 is 78kg all up, but 70cm shorter. The only way to significantly reduce the weight of the icon would be to make it much more fragile, which isn't sensible as it isn't a speed at any cost sort of boat.
Back to Top
Do Different View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Jan 12
Location: North
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1312
Post Options Post Options   Quote Do Different Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jun 13 at 5:17pm
Originally posted by iGRF

Originally posted by RS400atC

Sorry mate, my boat's a bit hyperformance to take fat beginners for a ride....



And there you have the essence of what I'm saying, can't remember the percentage, but back in the day lots of folk entered windsurfing via their friends letting them 'have a go', so either they get to have a go in a beginner hulk or not because your boat is too <insert appropriate reason from the following list> Ugly difficult wooden complicated...

"As to the Icon my plan would be kite and single trap to help my 1st year entry level crew continue on his winning streak without having to worry about the boat filling up with water and sinking (that kind of puts new folk off)".

Man I have a lot of respect for your drive and ambition but come on is it really worthwhile wasting good sailing time reinventing what you have. By your own experience the Alto is a fine boat, OK so you're a little underweight in a blow but surely time spent refining technique would be a whole lot more fun for a 1st year crew than watching your untangle new systems that don't quite work. 
Back to Top
RS400atC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Dec 08
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3011
Post Options Post Options   Quote RS400atC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jun 13 at 5:40pm
Originally posted by Peaky

.....and even the 200 is 114kg. A N12 is 78kg all up, but 70cm shorter. The only way to significantly reduce the weight of the icon would be to make it much more fragile, which isn't sensible as it isn't a speed at any cost sort of boat.


Merlins seem to be able to build very strong boats in a crazy crinkle-cut format, carrying ridiculous amounts of lead. I'm sure it would be possible to design something icon-size a whole lot lighter, without spending the earth, with no baggage from legacy class rules.
90's SMODs like the 400 are from an era where carbon and kevlar were way more expensive than today.
Also they had asy's as their USP, they did not need to pursue lightness as well. They needed to keep the cost down to become the dominant SMOD, other wise we might all have ended up with ISO's or something.

I'm interested in the question, how light could you build a decent 2 person dinghy, without cost getting completely out of control and reliability becoming an issue?
Back to Top
iGRF View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 07 Mar 11
Location: Hythe
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6499
Post Options Post Options   Quote iGRF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jun 13 at 7:01pm
Originally posted by RS400atC


how will it be better than a 29er/L4K/iso/Buzz etc?If the centreboard is really the killer feature, why not slap a trapeze on a 400?Come to that, why single trapeze? If trapezing is in the equation why not the helm?Rig wise, how big a kite? rest of it same as icon?Assume you mean asy?Don't mean to sound anti, just lots of ....why?


29er? It's a bethwaite straight rocker low volume nose daggerboard destined to nose dive and pitch pole at every opportunity on the water we use and not much use on inland round the cans due to the lack of a wing wang and too big kite imv. L4K is dead and too heavy for anybody to even lift the coffin to bury it, ISO ditto, Buzz? What's a buzz? suspect the same.
Why do I like it? Because it is clean and simple and I can lift it. I'm not yet totally convinced but it's a better bet in a couple of ways. 1 it wont fill up with water and sink like the Alto can give a fair impression of doing on the odd occasion, 2) It won't pull my shoulder out of joint like the Alto has just done recently pulling it down the beach, honestly I'm so done with heavy. This is the year 2013 no boat should weigh more than reasonable human body weight all up and we all know reasonable human body weight ends at the upper limit of 80 kgs. We're racers ffs why why why do we even consider extra weight? Why only the totally moronic or class lead sheep.

Edited by iGRF - 28 Jun 13 at 7:02pm
Back to Top
2547 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 11
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1151
Post Options Post Options   Quote 2547 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jun 13 at 7:12pm
Originally posted by iGRF

Originally posted by RS400atC


how will it be better than a 29er/L4K/iso/Buzz etc?If the centreboard is really the killer feature, why not slap a trapeze on a 400?Come to that, why single trapeze? If trapezing is in the equation why not the helm?Rig wise, how big a kite? rest of it same as icon?Assume you mean asy?Don't mean to sound anti, just lots of ....why?


29er? It's a bethwaite straight rocker low volume nose daggerboard destined to nose dive and pitch pole at every opportunity on the water we use and not much use on inland round the cans due to the lack of a wing wang and too big kite imv. L4K is dead and too heavy for anybody to even lift the coffin to bury it, ISO ditto, Buzz? What's a buzz? suspect the same.
Why do I like it? Because it is clean and simple and I can lift it. I'm not yet totally convinced but it's a better bet in a couple of ways. 1 it wont fill up with water and sink like the Alto can give a fair impression of doing on the odd occasion, 2) It won't pull my shoulder out of joint like the Alto has just done recently pulling it down the beach, honestly I'm so done with heavy. This is the year 2013 no boat should weigh more than reasonable human body weight all up and we all know reasonable human body weight ends at the upper limit of 80 kgs. We're racers ffs why why why do we even consider extra weight? Why only the totally moronic or class lead sheep.

Have you considered getting a carbon tubes trolley? Think about the whole mass not just the boat ... and perhaps some fatter tyres to reduce the rolling resistance ... or some mates to help ...???
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1314151617 38>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy