Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Wiki Sail by GRF |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2223242526 34> |
Author | |
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 05 Apr 13 at 4:24pm |
I'd sold it before that came out but why? 7.4 is pathetic, how is it I can compete with a 9.5 holding it in my bare hands, an 8.5 is a change down sail, why should I have to have a 7.4 that girls and small children use to windsurf race with?
Why, somebody tell me why that is, sensibly now it's an honest question, why can someone my weight happily cope with an 8.5 on a sailboard but not on a dinghy? If the answer isn't that they are better designed and more fit for purpose? Edited by iGRF - 05 Apr 13 at 4:25pm |
|
![]() |
|
pondmonkey ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2202 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
because it's more efficient? 8M is the max allowed on a Moth...
|
|
![]() |
|
robin34024 ![]() Posting king ![]() ![]() Joined: 03 Jan 12 Location: Lincoln Online Status: Offline Posts: 116 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Windsurfing rigs, granted are probably higher tech than those on dinghies, but the sails are so much flatter, and doesn't the top third or so just bend off downwind in the gusts? besides, all the power generated in a dinghy is transferred straight into the hull, generating only sideways and forwards forces when split into vector quantities, unlike on a windsurfer where there is a significant upwards component and not such a great sideways component if my understanding is correct... which really is quite a big if :/
|
|
![]() |
|
robin34024 ![]() Posting king ![]() ![]() Joined: 03 Jan 12 Location: Lincoln Online Status: Offline Posts: 116 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
plus, since the rig is not rigidly attatched to the board, you have far more leverage against the sail, since you are leaning against the force far closer to the centre of effort of the sails than in a dinghy.
|
|
![]() |
|
fab100 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 Mar 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1005 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Come on, think about it. You keep telling us we don't understand the physics of forces, moments and vectors but you cannot work this one out?? You can't have it both ways Graeme. You may think you can, but you can't. Either withdraw all the silly arguments about apparent wind or work it out and explain this one to us. It ain't hard and you've already been given most of the answer.
|
|
![]() |
|
AlexM ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 10 Jan 06 Online Status: Offline Posts: 857 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
How heavy are you?
You come across like the character Tyrion Lannister. I think the rigs have quite a broad range, smaller 75-92 and bigger 95-115 Edited by AlexM - 05 Apr 13 at 5:00pm |
|
![]() |
|
Do Different ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 26 Jan 12 Location: North Online Status: Offline Posts: 1312 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Come on GRF, make your mind up, either you are talking sense or being an agent of provocation.
Your contributions on the Sails & Sailmakers thread were both refreshing and informative. Now it's back to Boards are 21st Century and Dinghies are Stone Age. You know very well they very different animals having to work to totally different parameters. Of course a board can carry a big rig. As said it's flatter and having to drive a fraction of the mass & drag of a dinghy. Opposite and equal forces an' all that. A low resistance craft will need ...................., hang you know all this!!! or did when you did O Level physics back at school. Well I did O levels, I guess you did.
|
|
![]() |
|
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Which is why dingies need to be lighter so they're not so heavy to drive and have reduced wetted area so they don't have so much drag, then perhaps I will be able to handle a big sail..
|
|
![]() |
|
Medway Maniac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
But the key to reducing wetted area is to reduce the waterline beam, then the boat becomes too tippy (vide Moth). The fatties don't have this problem - they can have a good sail area/wetted area ratio for light airs merely by being able to 'support' a load more sail area. You can, as a lightweight, increase the sail area by using sitting out aids à la IC, but then again you are into handling problems.
The answer would be a 15 foot version of the tunnel hull scow Moth, and that was the tragedy of watching your V2 folly unfold. If you'd only stretched one of these up to a decent waterline length, kept the weight minimal and put a Halo rig on it, you'd have had a viable, easy s'hander with a PY of maybe 920, even without the kite: ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well I was after an offshore fast planing thing and didn't appreciate just how heavy it would end up, and the planned waterline on the Original spec was the same as a Contender, things just didn't work out exactly as they should have, but then the chances of getting it right first time....
If I can find someone a little closer to home that i can oversee what they're up to, I won't get it wrong next time. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2223242526 34> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |