Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Claims against Sailing Clubs |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 56789 13> |
Author | |
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 07 Mar 13 at 7:06pm |
Should they also apply pressure to the owner to pay for the damage, rather than the bloke who chartered it? I am open minded about all of this, it all depends on the details of the circumstances, I can see scenario where I would lay the blame in different directions. All we can take out of it without hearing the detail, is that both race teams/organisers and sailors need to a) check their insurance and b) think about their responsibilities. I would have hoped that this could be sorted amicably, if not avoided in the first place, but the rest of us should see it as a reminder. |
|
![]() |
|
2547 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes probably.
|
|
![]() |
|
clubmember ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 25 Feb 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi All, Many thanks for your comments. There have been ‘some’ salient points. Having read through them, I would like to add the following; -The RO is RYA qualified and very experienced/respected sailor -The club is very experienced at running events -The RYA and ‘Legal society’ have confirmed that disclaimers are almost pointless -I believe there was no protest from the claimant regarding the incident -I personally suspect the claimant was not adequately covered and if true, in this case, the claimant should have known better. They probably had 3rd party but that would not be sufficient to make a claim in this type of scenario One of the tests will be if our insurance company ask the claimant to manage the claim through his own insurance It’s a very interesting situation as there are clearly implications regarding club sailing and further complications regarding responsibilities etc. They’re manageable, maybe necessary (having learned from the episode) but very unfortunate. It’s left a rather unsavoury taste and one that may not even be able to be resolved i.e. I believe the insurance company will pay out which in short, doesn’t really help the situation. I’m not excepting a resolution through this
forum but was interested in whether this is a unique case, happened elsewhere
and is/or likely, to increase. I’m sure
there will be a resolution that does not cost the club a great deal more than
the excess but it’s just a little unsavoury. We support the RO unreservedly and although
the cost implications are not huge, it’s the outfall from such events that’s
the worry e.g. a club that may not wish to offer regattas and may spread to
others if incidents like this occur, further A lack of willing volunteers, refusal to hold events for certain classes and increased insurance costs are all possible outcomes. All will lead to higher costs for all competitors and possibly limit opportunities to race. As clubs, I’m sure we are all aware of the responsibilities we hold when delivering events but should clubs that rely on volunteers really want to operate with in such tight and regulated frameworks – maybe a necessity in today’s litigious society. If the club was genuinely at fault, then so be it – you must learn from it. Unfortunately, it just feels more like a last resort from an embarrassed, maybe not quite as insured as he should have been and tried all other avenues to recover costs, sailor. As soon as I am aware of the outcomes, I shall let you know. If anything, it would be good to warn other clubs of this type of scenario and hopefully enable processes to be implemented that protect us, if some are not already doing so and to share them. |
|
![]() |
|
Pierre ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1532 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So, one possible outcome of this, which clubmember has pointed out, is that clubs may no longer wish to entertain certain classes that are perceived as a possible problem.
Ultimately that gives the classes in question two options. 1) No more class events or 2) They will have to pay heavily in monetary terms for use of a club's facilities, insurance and race officiation and put the whole thing on a purely business basis with contracts and insurance. Seems a heavy price to pay for a broken dagger board An over simplification perhaps, but the corinthian ethos of sailing is being tested here. |
|
![]() |
|
SoggyBadger ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 26 Oct 10 Location: The Wild Wood Online Status: Offline Posts: 552 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I totally agree Pierre. This would set a precedent that just about any damage to a boat not caused by another competitor can be reclaimed from the club even if the boat has an all racing risks policy because why claim on my insurance if I can sue you/claim off yours instead?
|
|
Best wishes from deep in the woods
SB |
|
![]() |
|
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Or maybe it will just mean people don't run events for dagger board boats at shallow venues?
There is a lot of deep water around the UK, and plenty of pivoting foil classes to choose from.
|
|
![]() |
|
SoggyBadger ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 26 Oct 10 Location: The Wild Wood Online Status: Offline Posts: 552 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
But to get to the deep water you need to sail through shallow water first. And it goes much wider than just dagger boards. What about fixed rudders? Masts in the mud? Burgees? |
|
Best wishes from deep in the woods
SB |
|
![]() |
|
Contender443 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 Oct 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1211 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This does leave a very bad taste and not something we as sailing clubs want to get into. Every club has its risks be it shallow water, rocks, launching and recovery into surf, harbour walls, rock groynes, strong tides, river currents, seaweed, debris etc. Let alone the risks that the weather presents.
So what is a RO supposed to do?
|
|
Bonnie Lass Contender 1764
|
|
![]() |
|
pondmonkey ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2202 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
go to the pub... no way I'd put myself (or my club) in the position of being sued by someone a) incompetent to keep clear of shallow waters and b) foolish enough to continue sailing with gear failure liable to cause further damage... the boards were 'stuck down'... sounds like a maintenance issue to me and that's ultimately down to the helmsman to ensure s/he is sailing a tidy enough craft if entering a race and the owner who's sh*t this is to sort out by letting the boat onto the water. moto of the story... don't lend your boat out to someone who doesn't 'get' the you bend it, you mend it rule the rest of us take for granted.
|
|
![]() |
|
2547 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'd hope you can encourage your insurance company to go to court and pursue costs as well.
If they front down this wally he will probably cave in at the risk of coping the costs. I would expect there is a queue of expert witnesses willing to support the RO and club. I think the F18s will find it hard to find future open meeting & championship venues. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 56789 13> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |