New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Claims against Sailing Clubs
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Claims against Sailing Clubs

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 13>
Author
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Claims against Sailing Clubs
    Posted: 07 Mar 13 at 11:32am
Originally posted by SoggyBadger

I've not seen anything in the RRS which obliges the RO to warn people of hazards. The law firmly puts the responsibility for the safety of the vessel on the boat's master (usually the helm in a racing dinghy).

Although interestingly, the rules prevent you from racing with certain safety equipment, such as depth sounders.

I imagine it may come down to whether the course was 'reasonably' navigable. If only one boat out of thirty was damaged by running aground, then it is hard to see that the RO has been neglegent. If all thirty did, that may suggest the course was inappropriate.

It has been blatantly obvious that the increasing aspect ratio of catamaran daggers will lead to more groundings and more damage. But you do have a free choice in whether to use such impractical boards, whether you should raise them, whether you should do the event and whether you even sail such a class. IMHO the F18 class should have done more to limit the length of boards, but that is a sepertae debate.
Back to Top
SoggyBadger View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Oct 10
Location: The Wild Wood
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 552
Post Options Post Options   Quote SoggyBadger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Mar 13 at 12:15pm
Originally posted by Peaky

Although interestingly, the rules prevent you from racing with certain safety equipment, such as depth sounders.


But it's up to the skipper to decide if not using a depth sounder would risk his vessel. If he enters the race then he has shown that he does not consider it a risk. It's like if it's really honking out there and the RO puts a race on. Whether or not you join the race is your decision and the responsibility for whatever happens is yours and yours alone.

Originally posted by Peaky

It has been blatantly obvious that the increasing aspect ratio of catamaran daggers will lead to more groundings and more damage. But you do have a free choice in whether to use such impractical boards, whether you should raise them, whether you should do the event and whether you even sail such a class. IMHO the F18 class should have done more to limit the length of boards, but that is a sepertae debate.


And it can be argued that the skippers of such boats need to extra diligent in keeping to a good depth of water since the consequences of grounding are going to be greater than in the average dinghy where the centreboard will simply kick up a few inches.
Best wishes from deep in the woods

SB

Back to Top
Wetabix View Drop Down
Posting king
Posting king


Joined: 15 Feb 10
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 118
Post Options Post Options   Quote Wetabix Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Mar 13 at 12:57pm
I accept that anyone turning up at an open meeting has a right to feel 'miffed' if the RO and the race committee screw up but that is not the same thing as being able to sue them. What I fear in this case is that the claims lawyer will put the frighteners on the club, the club will claim on their public liability insurance and the matter will be forgotten about.  The trouble is, you can insure yourself against a monetary claim but not against being put in jail. Let us, perish the thought, assume that the man who was run down by the hovercraft dies. Let us assume further that he is a 'young person under the age of 16'. If the RO is responsible for the safety of all those taking part in the race, notwithstanding the numerous disclaimers that will have been written in the SIs and club handbook, and that he is responsible even if the casualty was not acting particularly sensibly, then volunteering is over. Ther must be some lawyers reading this - what's the answer?
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Mar 13 at 1:03pm
[cynic]The answer is that lawyers want to get richer, so its entirely in their interests that we should all be vulnerable to getting sued in every aspect of our lives.[/cynic]
Back to Top
SoggyBadger View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Oct 10
Location: The Wild Wood
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 552
Post Options Post Options   Quote SoggyBadger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Mar 13 at 1:20pm
Originally posted by Wetabix

the club will claim on their public liability insurance and the matter will be forgotten about


The club's insurers would take the attitude "see you in court". Which would be a good thing as they'd win hands down leaving the original miscreant with the costs against him. Add to that the fact that his identity will undoubtedly become known amongst the fleet and perhaps into the wider sailing community and he'll become unwelcome at any sailing club in the land.
Best wishes from deep in the woods

SB

Back to Top
Dougaldog View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 05 Nov 10
Location: hamble
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 356
Post Options Post Options   Quote Dougaldog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Mar 13 at 1:29pm
I hope this answer might help set the record if not straight - then a little clearer.
If the event was a Nationals or major Open Meeting, then the recommendation is that the PRO should be an RYA accredited National Race Officer (NRO). Part of the deal with the RYA is that NROs are covered by the RYA Insurance; it's a good way to do things, as it is not easy to get the qualification, so the RYA can have some confidence that their NROs are not going to screw up.
 
As a busy Race Officer who runs a number of Championships/large events each year in shallow and tidal waters, I make sure that any potential hazards are highlighted in the briefing. I also ensure that the Race Team are aware of the tidal 'window' and how this impacts on the depth of water at all the marks. If I had the faintest of inklings that there was insufficent water 'in the starting area' then I'd pull that start and relay the course in deeper water.
The problem with this thread is that there is either too much information or not nearly enough! I'm often amazed at how far boats wander away from the start area, even when a sequence is under way. If a boat does that and then runs aground, well, so be it. Even if they run aground closer to the course area, proving negligence can be a tricky task (as someone has already said, one boat aground is a problem for the individual, all of them aground is cause for an abandoned race!) 
 
The message, to me, is clear: use an accredited RO in the first place, attend the briefings, apply common sense (if you don't know the area, take time to find out) but - leave the lawyers for the real cases when they can add something - this to me is not such a case!
Dougal H
Back to Top
andymck View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 15 Dec 06
Location: Stamford
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 397
Post Options Post Options   Quote andymck Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Mar 13 at 2:42pm
Originally posted by SoggyBadger


Originally posted by Wetabix

the club will claim on their public liability insurance and the matter will be forgotten about
The club's insurers would take the attitude "see you in court". Which would be a good thing as they'd win hands down leaving the original miscreant with the costs against him. Add to that the fact that his identity will undoubtedly become known amongst the fleet and perhaps into the wider sailing community and he'll become unwelcome at any sailing club in the land.



I wish this was the case. In truth there will be an assessment of likely cost of defending. The risk of losing. The chances of actually gaining their costs back. Much more likely in what is probably a low value case is that they will go for the least expensive option. This is usually a no fault payment for a proportion of the value being claimed. They may try the sue me route, but the original post appeared to say it was the legal assistance firm. Most of us tick that box on our insurance cover. I suspect they have also done their maths on this one too.
Certainly that's how the majority of medico legal cases appear to be settled.
What the club needs is firm backing from the RYA about the responsibility of the PRO and the competitor. Witness statements from other competitors regarding grounding would also help. Even so, I have seen perfectly defendable cases go down the no fault route.

Andy
Andy Mck
Back to Top
2547 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 11
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1151
Post Options Post Options   Quote 2547 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Mar 13 at 3:14pm
I think the class association has a role here, they should get written support from all the other competitors and publish that ...

If I were a club I would not be keen to host any class that allowed this amongst its ranks.
Back to Top
RS400atC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Dec 08
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3011
Post Options Post Options   Quote RS400atC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Mar 13 at 6:21pm
Originally posted by 2547

I think the class association has a role here, they should get written support from all the other competitors and publish that ...

If I were a club I would not be keen to host any class that allowed this amongst its ranks.

TBH I think the class association is likely to be responsible for choosing the venue, promoting the event and taking the money.
The sailor's contract is with whoever sold him the service.
Back to Top
2547 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 11
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1151
Post Options Post Options   Quote 2547 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Mar 13 at 6:37pm
Originally posted by RS400atC

Originally posted by 2547

I think the class association has a role here, they should get written support from all the other competitors and publish that ...

If I were a club I would not be keen to host any class that allowed this amongst its ranks.

TBH I think the class association is likely to be responsible for choosing the venue, promoting the event and taking the money.
The sailor's contract is with whoever sold him the service.

What I mean is his peers should apply pressure to withdraw the case. 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 13>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy