Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Claims against Sailing Clubs |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 45678 13> |
Author | ||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 07 Mar 13 at 11:32am |
|
Although interestingly, the rules prevent you from racing with certain safety equipment, such as depth sounders. I imagine it may come down to whether the course was 'reasonably' navigable. If only one boat out of thirty was damaged by running aground, then it is hard to see that the RO has been neglegent. If all thirty did, that may suggest the course was inappropriate. It has been blatantly obvious that the increasing aspect ratio of catamaran daggers will lead to more groundings and more damage. But you do have a free choice in whether to use such impractical boards, whether you should raise them, whether you should do the event and whether you even sail such a class. IMHO the F18 class should have done more to limit the length of boards, but that is a sepertae debate. |
||
![]() |
||
SoggyBadger ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 26 Oct 10 Location: The Wild Wood Online Status: Offline Posts: 552 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
But it's up to the skipper to decide if not using a depth sounder would risk his vessel. If he enters the race then he has shown that he does not consider it a risk. It's like if it's really honking out there and the RO puts a race on. Whether or not you join the race is your decision and the responsibility for whatever happens is yours and yours alone.
And it can be argued that the skippers of such boats need to extra diligent in keeping to a good depth of water since the consequences of grounding are going to be greater than in the average dinghy where the centreboard will simply kick up a few inches. |
||
Best wishes from deep in the woods
SB |
||
![]() |
||
Wetabix ![]() Posting king ![]() Joined: 15 Feb 10 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 118 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I accept that anyone turning up at an open meeting has a right to feel 'miffed' if the RO and the race committee screw up but that is not the same thing as being able to sue them. What I fear in this case is that the claims lawyer will put the frighteners on the club, the club will claim on their public liability insurance and the matter will be forgotten about. The trouble is, you can insure yourself against a monetary claim but not against being put in jail. Let us, perish the thought, assume that the man who was run down by the hovercraft dies. Let us assume further that he is a 'young person under the age of 16'. If the RO is responsible for the safety of all those taking part in the race, notwithstanding the numerous disclaimers that will have been written in the SIs and club handbook, and that he is responsible even if the casualty was not acting particularly sensibly, then volunteering is over. Ther must be some lawyers reading this - what's the answer?
|
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
[cynic]The answer is that lawyers want to get richer, so its entirely in their interests that we should all be vulnerable to getting sued in every aspect of our lives.[/cynic]
|
||
![]() |
||
SoggyBadger ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 26 Oct 10 Location: The Wild Wood Online Status: Offline Posts: 552 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The club's insurers would take the attitude "see you in court". Which would be a good thing as they'd win hands down leaving the original miscreant with the costs against him. Add to that the fact that his identity will undoubtedly become known amongst the fleet and perhaps into the wider sailing community and he'll become unwelcome at any sailing club in the land. |
||
Best wishes from deep in the woods
SB |
||
![]() |
||
Dougaldog ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 05 Nov 10 Location: hamble Online Status: Offline Posts: 356 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I hope this answer might help set the record if not straight - then a little clearer.
If the event was a Nationals or major Open Meeting, then the recommendation is that the PRO should be an RYA accredited National Race Officer (NRO). Part of the deal with the RYA is that NROs are covered by the RYA Insurance; it's a good way to do things, as it is not easy to get the qualification, so the RYA can have some confidence that their NROs are not going to screw up.
As a busy Race Officer who runs a number of Championships/large events each year in shallow and tidal waters, I make sure that any potential hazards are highlighted in the briefing. I also ensure that the Race Team are aware of the tidal 'window' and how this impacts on the depth of water at all the marks. If I had the faintest of inklings that there was insufficent water 'in the starting area' then I'd pull that start and relay the course in deeper water.
The problem with this thread is that there is either too much information or not nearly enough! I'm often amazed at how far boats wander away from the start area, even when a sequence is under way. If a boat does that and then runs aground, well, so be it. Even if they run aground closer to the course area, proving negligence can be a tricky task (as someone has already said, one boat aground is a problem for the individual, all of them aground is cause for an abandoned race!)
The message, to me, is clear: use an accredited RO in the first place, attend the briefings, apply common sense (if you don't know the area, take time to find out) but - leave the lawyers for the real cases when they can add something - this to me is not such a case!
|
||
Dougal H
|
||
![]() |
||
andymck ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 15 Dec 06 Location: Stamford Online Status: Offline Posts: 397 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I wish this was the case. In truth there will be an assessment of likely cost of defending. The risk of losing. The chances of actually gaining their costs back. Much more likely in what is probably a low value case is that they will go for the least expensive option. This is usually a no fault payment for a proportion of the value being claimed. They may try the sue me route, but the original post appeared to say it was the legal assistance firm. Most of us tick that box on our insurance cover. I suspect they have also done their maths on this one too. Certainly that's how the majority of medico legal cases appear to be settled. What the club needs is firm backing from the RYA about the responsibility of the PRO and the competitor. Witness statements from other competitors regarding grounding would also help. Even so, I have seen perfectly defendable cases go down the no fault route. Andy |
||
Andy Mck
|
||
![]() |
||
2547 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I think the class association has a role here, they should get written support from all the other competitors and publish that ...
If I were a club I would not be keen to host any class that allowed this amongst its ranks.
|
||
![]() |
||
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
TBH I think the class association is likely to be responsible for choosing the venue, promoting the event and taking the money. The sailor's contract is with whoever sold him the service. |
||
![]() |
||
2547 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
What I mean is his peers should apply pressure to withdraw the case.
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 45678 13> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |