Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Quick PY Question |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 678910 16> |
Author | |||
Kev M ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 11 Location: Landlocked Online Status: Offline Posts: 346 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 11 Jan 13 at 10:05am |
||
I don't know but perhaps the Laser drop is overdue as a result of the bandit classes. If the idea of the PY system is to try and equalise the chances of a boat winning a race (or evening out it's chances over a series). When a new class or lipstick boat is introduced (and I'll use a Phantom as an example, I'm not picking on them in particular) perhaps their PY should have been where it is now when it was introduced. By giving it a slower PY it disproportionately disadvantaged boats like the Laser. Two things can be done to equalise those two boats, lower the Phantom and/or raise the Laser PY. It's not about the Laser getting slower over time, it's about it getting slower relative to other boats and if those boats have dodgy handicaps then boats like the Laser are unfairly penalised. |
|||
Successfully confusing ambition with ability since 1980.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Well 1) I don't think you'll find anybody in the windsurf community that would agree with according me deity status, ![]() Edited by iGRF - 11 Jan 13 at 10:07am |
|||
![]() |
|||
marke ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 16 Jun 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 211 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
GBR940 - you ask if there is a 'standard' time for the PY system. The PY calculation is a time-on-time system so it works for any length of race . . . within reason. Very short races (<20 minutes) are probably going to be overly influenced by the start and the fast boats working through the slower boats - very long races (>2 hours) have a greater chance of the fastest boats sailing in different wind/tide conditions to the slowest (unless you use average lap timing). [BTW - you are not alone in thinking that the numbers only work for 60 minute races - I have heard that from some very experienced racers.]
With regard to course setting - yes it is possible to set courses that favour one boat over another. A simple triangle with relatively broad reaches is going to give a massive advantage to high powered skiffy asymmetrics. Similarly a course with close reaches and runs is likely to advantage the symmetric boats more. Add a bit of tide and that can complicate matters further. I'm not sure there is an answer to this - certainly don't think the RYA can tell you what is a fair course at your club. I do a fair amount of race training for beginners and intermediates at our club and anecdotally the course that seems to me to offer the fairest racing across a wide range of classes is a trapezoid - beat, tightish reach (but still kiteable - just), run and broadish reach. Don't have any numbers to back that up - but everybody seems to get something out of that type of course. Mark |
|||
![]() |
|||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
You know these days I'm starting to think that there is no such animal as a fair course for all boats of all classes. I think the best thing one can do is to ring the changes on things like reach angles, relative length of w/l and reaching legs, all the rest of it so that everyone gets a break from time to time. |
|||
![]() |
|||
pondmonkey ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2202 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
it doesn't need fixing, it's just coming to terms with its natural position in the watersports industry: - the kit is cumbersome compared to kiting. You can't take it on holiday if you fly any more on a lot of longhaul carriers and even if you can, it's a PITA. - as a media for tactical racing it sucks- compared to dinghies and yachts anyway - it's stuck itself in a wind-dependent category- planing only, unless you live by a decent ground swell beach and want to ride a SUP or Minitanker in sub-planing conditions. I grew up by a beach, but a SUP would suck just as much there as it would on Draycote. The windsurfers back home now kite to bring down the planing threshold. Who wants to go out for a glide on a board- even freestyle (the hallowed 'other side') is verging towards planing tricks being the only ones that count. And frankly they all look the same: technically challenging, but ultimately pointless ways to tack and gybe a windsurf board. - it's expensive and elitist- allegedly, although the truth is there's less credit and people have finally got a grip of a value judgement. If you're struggling to pay your mortgage and you think your job's at risk (or benefits won't rise with inflation) you're less likely to buy new golf clubs, a brand new car, £2000 road bikes, £80pcm gym memberships and £1200 windsurf boards. It's still the most natural and intuitive form of sailing I have ever done and I absolutely love it for the purity and free spirited nature of it. (A big thank you to you for re-introducing me to it) But I'm not kidding myself that its hard to progress (compared to snowboarding for example) and I'm only scratching the category of an intermediate level windsurfer by today's standards, despite quite a bit of commitment considering I have the usual constraints of family and work.
Edited by pondmonkey - 11 Jan 13 at 10:29am |
|||
![]() |
|||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I always believed and still do, that the stock Olympic Triangle Sausage was about as fair as you could get. It provides reaching and alternates windward leeward and by its very nature offers all the points of sailing that boats should be capable of dealing with. The moment courses started to be altered to cope with new craft was the moment things began to go wrong. If the craft can't cope with the course then the designer has failed and the potential customer is being defrauded. |
|||
![]() |
|||
blaze720 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
The 'classic' div1/Funboard class with centreboard and 7.5m sail (and before the clowns in control derestricted pumping) was a high popint. There were thousands and thousands of regular racers at dozens and dozens of sailing clubs across the UK. These craft were fast enough and could be raced alongside dinghies as just another class at most clubs and the future looked very rosy indeed .....
Then a vocal bunch in league with a few manufacturers decided to 'advance' the sport .. and part of this debacle was to abandon the classes like Div 1 (obviously you need to drop active support and kill them off otherwise the punters will not buy into 'the next best thing'). Yes lets tell the national authority it is the 'way of the future' etc . The derestriction of pumping also made a farce of racing at regular sailing clubs, as well as hacking off a lot of grass roots racers, and the board 'elite' got what they wanted. Trouble was everybody else went off to play with other toys, cos they were not encouraged any more with 'good' racing and 'good' product. ... and a few of us returned to or took up dinghy racing. Windsurf racing ... as a sport a classic example of how to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.... aided by national body and manufacturers alike. They killed off the greatest 'feeder' classes into sail racing of any kind that possibly ever existed .... abandoned the club infrastructure that was already in place as 'now not suitable' and then 'Honey, guess what - We've shrunk the sport ' Now what was someone saying about the dinghy set-up 'missing the point' ? The board decline and fall makes the banking industry look really very sane .... ![]() Rant over ! Mike L. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Noah ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Dec 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 611 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Oh No! I find myself in agreement with Graeme ![]() |
|||
Nick
D-Zero 316 |
|||
![]() |
|||
blaze720 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Oh No! I find myself in agreement with Graeme
![]() sh*t - me too !! Mike L. |
|||
![]() |
|||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
But should it be a 90 degree triangle or a 60 degree triangle, something inbetween or what? Normally there are no reaching legs with the true wind on or forward of the beam, and all legs tend to be spinnaker legs. This is a big advantage to kite boats because the fast single sail boat has most chance of saving its time if there is a white sail reaching leg... Then, assuming the start is at the leeward mark, should it be a downwind finish at the leeward mark or an upwind finish at the windward? If you have a mix of fast downwind boats and fast upwind boats then that will make a big difference... |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 678910 16> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |