Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Quick PY Question |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 16> |
Author | |
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 10 Jan 13 at 5:51pm |
Well if you don't have a fixed point to judge others by all you end up with is an anarchic jumble with things expanding both ways..
|
|
![]() |
|
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The trouble is, it's only really comparable at that level with other una rig singlehanders. Plus I suspect the 300 sailors are skewed to being more experienced than you average PY sailor, but that is probably true of Solo and Phantom too. There are not really enough 300's around to be a 'standard' IMHO, at least around the Solent area. I too think the whole PY thing is a muddle at the moment, too much reliance on spreadsheets and a complete avoidance of the issue of making judgements of crew talent. Plus people expect too much of it, disparate boats on tidal water is a much bigger problem than comparable boats without too much tidal variation. If I beat our local Laser 4000 on PY I feel I've sailed well, but our result against Wayfarers or Solos or RS600's is of little interest. |
|
![]() |
|
Hector ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Location: Otley, Yorkshire Online Status: Offline Posts: 750 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The 'old' standard boat was the Firefly. Thats when PYs were based around the 100 rating. After that they got upped to based around 120 I think, then the big leap to the 1000 range.
Can't agree that the RS300 should be a 'base' or 'Fixed point'. Ignoring the fact I can't see what the point is in the first place, picking a boat that is clearly difficult to sail well, but if mastered is very rewarding in performance and PY terms has surely got to be a bad move. IE the best can probably sail it to 900 the worst struggle to make 1100 - huge range. Shouldn't a standard / median / fixed point boat be something where the variation within it's own fleet is quite low? In any case as Jim will / has said its the sailors that produce the biggest variables. |
|
Keith
29er 661 (with my daughters / nephew) 49er 688 (with Phil P) RS200 968 Vortex (occasionally) Laser 2049XX |
|
![]() |
|
Ruscoe ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As a former 300 sailor i can confirm that the PY is about spot on, pretty much across the range. Back then i always struggled against a modern Phantom, but as the Phantom number has dropped i would suggest it would be a lot closer.
One thing that i find weird is the ranting on the Phantom forum about the PY dropping. I mean come on guys you cant all be deluded about how great a sailors you ALL are. Its well known up and down the country the the Phantom was/Is a Bandit. Nothing wrong with that but you cant expect it to stay like that forever, the statistics are catching up with you! The top sailors will always win, just look how well Hawksie is doing in the current series off a further reduced number! In conditions so far that have not suited the Phantom. If the PY drop is killing the class then you have to look at why people bought the boat in the first place. Stretch has it right, hike harder, sail harder and your 5 point drop pales to insignificance! As for Split PY numbers, good luck trying to enforce that boys, we have tried with the D1, its not happening. its too hard for clubs and the RYA to split the data. I guess in the long run you will see less phantoms sailed at salty locations. The way to counter act this is to push for more salty sailors so the returns bring the number back up. The Phantom has grown into a great class, so why not class race the thing and enjoy it. if you are worried about handicap position then you will always need to change in the hunt for the next lipstick class that's been lightened, stiffened, carboned and still using its number relating to boats built in the 80's!! ![]() By the way, this is not a dig at the class. its a statement of fact. The PY system is finally catching up with the Phantom. Keep enjoying what is a great boat and understand like the rest of us that if you sail better then the next man you will win. Stop relying on a spreadsheet.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
gbr940 ![]() Posting king ![]() ![]() Joined: 04 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 198 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
uhm...has anyone ever worked out a similar system like SCHRS for us monomarans - this surely is the way forward?
|
|
RS400 GBR1321
|
|
![]() |
|
Noah ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Dec 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 611 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That's exactly what has happened at Shoreham. We had up to 7 or 8 not too long ago. Now its one or two. Why? All sorts of reasons; not many connected with handicap. Some relating to weight and/or waves... For my 2d, in our handicap fleet its the sailors I respect who I worry about. If I beat someone I consider to be better than me then I'm a happy bunny. |
|
Nick
D-Zero 316 |
|
![]() |
|
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
rb_stretch ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 23 Aug 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 742 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I suspect the couple of posters who made the rants on the Phantom forum are sea sailors or they have non-epoxy/non-carbon mast phantoms (some still do), so they are going to feel the effects of a PY drop much harder. I think most Phantom sailors acknowledge that the handicap had to come down from where it originally was. I bought my boat 2 years ago now, when I think the PY was 1038 and I was very comfortable with that. When it was new, I suspect the previous owner was sailing it on something over 1050, so he must have been laughing on PY in comparison. It's now 5 years old and the PY has dropped to 1020 in my club and I haven't really noticed my results getting any worse (actually they're probably getting better as my sailing is improving). When conditions suit you still do well, when they don't some other boat will walk over you. Personally I'm amazed that a 40+ year old design for single chine plywood construction is so close in performance to something like a 300. It can't fall much further otherwise it will be at the same PY as the 300, and that can't be right, or it means design really hasn't moved forward at all. |
|
![]() |
|
Ruscoe ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Both very different boats though arnt they! A wooden Phantom would get spanked by a 300, but a modern Phantom is lighter with more sail area! No wonder its pretty much as fast.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Which is another reason the PY system needs revisiting, a Wood, Old Plastic and Epoxy boat should all have different Handicaps, same as the Merlin. It's not difficult to date them. I don't understand why someone doesn't just grasp the nettle and sort it once and for all, it's not rocket science, if those Cat Wallers are onto something with their SCHRS system then we should nick it, I'm sure a measurement/dated based system would be fairer in the long run and less likely to be manipulated behind closed doors by vested interests whoever they may be. Edited by iGRF - 10 Jan 13 at 7:38pm |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 16> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |