New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: RS400 proposed changes
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

RS400 proposed changes

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1819202122 29>
Author
Neptune View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 08 Jun 09
Location: Berkshire United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1314
Post Options Post Options   Quote Neptune Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: RS400 proposed changes
    Posted: 03 Nov 12 at 10:27am
Indeed
Musto Skiff and Solo sailor
Back to Top
blaze720 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1635
Post Options Post Options   Quote blaze720 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Nov 12 at 11:20am
Its not my call in any way but in my view all SMOD's (and any other class) need to allow for some evolution.  No 'one design' to my knowledge has EVER been nailed to the original specification as produced on day 1 ... and that includes SMODs as wall as more traditional 'one-design' classes.  

The issue is one of 'reasonableness'.  'No change ever' risks class death just as might excessive change that leaves no 'reasonable' upgrade path thus making earlier boats totally uncompetitive.   Some changes can be to to resolve engineering improvements .. others because materials technology and availability changes over time... or the world has simply moved on.  Dinghy classes are highly unusual in that as a product they can have effective lives measured in many decades - very few products 'last' that long without total replacement.   

If current owners want / approve changes then frankly I do not see a major problem.  If any change reinvigorates the class, adds new owners  etc existing 'used' prices will hold up very well and may even increase.  The occasional problem is if the class 'sags' and becomes a classical 'cheapest entry'  one - then the price of even say a replacement set of sails, improved or as original, can be more than the boat overall is 'worth' ... the owners who got into the class because it became very cheap as is 'sagged' may become very resistent to ANY change at all - and may even be in a majority.  At that point the rights holders may have to write-off the class as a long term survivor or bite the bullet and 'lead' the class forward.

 A tough call either way !

Mike L.

     


Edited by blaze720 - 03 Nov 12 at 11:22am
Back to Top
jeffers View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3048
Post Options Post Options   Quote jeffers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Nov 12 at 11:24am
Well said Mike. 

I know one example of a class that has very successfully been through several small evolutions but nothing that has obsoleted the older boats (so far).

I do believe there were changes to the hull of the 400.....that does not smack to me of a small change! 

Just my 2p....
Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
Back to Top
pondmonkey View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 11
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2202
Post Options Post Options   Quote pondmonkey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Nov 12 at 2:01pm
I can't see a problem personally. The class voted for the changes, it's given the boat a bit of face lift without monumentally obseleting the cheaper end of the aftermarket and it's addressed one of the criticisms of its design era- no single string kite system. That's just made crewing them more simple- which is good, as it means that you can take a less experienced crew out, widening the pool of potential crews to pick from.

To put it in real terms, and please I'm not criticising the Icon, but seeing redders' 400 at the FOM reminded me quite why I've always liked the 400- it looks like a real boat, and also just as modern as the new design 20 years later, which I also like as looks like a solid yacht rather than a.n.other overcanvassed tea tray.

Great boats- excellent custodianship from the RS and the Owners- I hope it continues to be as popular as it has been to date.

Edited by pondmonkey - 03 Nov 12 at 2:03pm
Back to Top
alstorer View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 02 Aug 07
Location: Cambridge
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2899
Post Options Post Options   Quote alstorer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Nov 12 at 2:13pm
The class did make a good choice- whilst the full on square top and various other rig changes would have made the boat look better (I saw the prototype out testing), it would have done immense damage to the class.
-_
Al
Back to Top
Ruscoe View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 10
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1514
Post Options Post Options   Quote Ruscoe Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Nov 12 at 3:04pm
I'm only joking guys hence the smiley. I agree completely with mike and restricted development or modification IMO is a must for a class to remain successful. The 400 is a smashing boat and I wouldn't look to far away from one if I was looking for a double hander with a mate.

Back to Top
Neptune View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 08 Jun 09
Location: Berkshire United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1314
Post Options Post Options   Quote Neptune Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Nov 12 at 3:12pm
The irony was lost Ruscoe.
Musto Skiff and Solo sailor
Back to Top
Oatsandbeans View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 19 Sep 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 382
Post Options Post Options   Quote Oatsandbeans Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Nov 12 at 3:47pm
When I heard that the luff curve was (allegedly) greater on the new sails, I assumed (again possibly wrongly)  that this was done to get round the tendency for the rig to go over the front with the spinnaker up in a breeze. If this is the case you cant really knock RS for trying to make the boat easier to sail when its windy.
Back to Top
Rupert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 04
Location: Whitefriars sc
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8956
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rupert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Nov 12 at 3:50pm
Originally posted by Neptune

The irony was lost Ruscoe.


Not to all...

I sail 3 classes of boat, one of which (the Firefly) went through a lot of changes when Rondar took over building the boats, and has been a big success.

Another, the Lightning, is still going through the aftermath of changes, but the initial prognosis is pretty good. New boats might be faster because they are new, not because there is a different builder, and new sail cloth and rudder shape are working their way into the fleet.

The 3rd boat, the Minisail, falls into the "people buy them because they are so cheap" catagory Mike describes.

All these classes needed or need change to stand a chance of keeping or starting fleet racing on a reasonable scale. But too much change or change in the wrong direction will kill them.

The RS400 changes seem right to me, as the boat at our club which got new sails looked like a new boat with them up - very good looking.
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
Back to Top
RS400atC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Dec 08
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3011
Post Options Post Options   Quote RS400atC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Nov 12 at 4:12pm
Originally posted by Ruscoe

Originally posted by Neptune

Thought it was supposed to be same, just new cloth

and me, do that mean the shape has changed??  Must piss off Rs400atC, if his OD racing is compromised by different cuts of sails!?!  Wink  Big smile


As I understand it, we voted to keep the same shape, including set shape, of mainsail.
RS chose to add some extra luff round, with the fine intention of encouraging people to sail with more prebend, reducing the number of mast breakages under extreme downwind conditions.
However, many people are sailing with the same spreader settings.
I suspect this has given heavier people a bit of an edge, particularly on courses with an excess of tight 3 sail reaches.
In windward-leeward racing I think the difference is probably small.
In our particular club racing, we find that sailing with old style sails, we can still occasionally beat the new boats, apart from feeling that our previous slight disadvantage on a tight reach ( we are a bit lighter than most, and my crew is not that strong) has been exaggerated a little, nothing has really changed.
The new style sails are a small change compared with the variation between a good crew and an average crew. There must be some advantage in having a new boat, where all the fittings work properly, no scratches, no wear letting the foils wobble about etc.
Also, not only are my sails the old style, they are well used. Maybe our tired jib is having more effect on tight reaches than I expect, or maybe I don't concentrate enough on the processional legs?

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1819202122 29>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy