Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
RS400 proposed changes |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1819202122 29> |
Author | ||
Neptune ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 Jun 09 Location: Berkshire United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1314 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 03 Nov 12 at 10:27am |
|
Indeed
![]() |
||
Musto Skiff and Solo sailor
|
||
![]() |
||
blaze720 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Its not my call in any way but in my view all SMOD's (and any other class) need to allow for some evolution. No 'one design' to my knowledge has EVER been nailed to the original specification as produced on day 1 ... and that includes SMODs as wall as more traditional 'one-design' classes.
The issue is one of 'reasonableness'. 'No change ever' risks class death just as might excessive change that leaves no 'reasonable' upgrade path thus making earlier boats totally uncompetitive. Some changes can be to to resolve engineering improvements .. others because materials technology and availability changes over time... or the world has simply moved on. Dinghy classes are highly unusual in that as a product they can have effective lives measured in many decades - very few products 'last' that long without total replacement. If current owners want / approve changes then frankly I do not see a major problem. If any change reinvigorates the class, adds new owners etc existing 'used' prices will hold up very well and may even increase. The occasional problem is if the class 'sags' and becomes a classical 'cheapest entry' one - then the price of even say a replacement set of sails, improved or as original, can be more than the boat overall is 'worth' ... the owners who got into the class because it became very cheap as is 'sagged' may become very resistent to ANY change at all - and may even be in a majority. At that point the rights holders may have to write-off the class as a long term survivor or bite the bullet and 'lead' the class forward. A tough call either way ! Mike L. Edited by blaze720 - 03 Nov 12 at 11:22am |
||
![]() |
||
jeffers ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Well said Mike.
I know one example of a class that has very successfully been through several small evolutions but nothing that has obsoleted the older boats (so far). I do believe there were changes to the hull of the 400.....that does not smack to me of a small change! Just my 2p....
|
||
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
||
![]() |
||
pondmonkey ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2202 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I can't see a problem personally. The class voted for the changes, it's given the boat a bit of face lift without monumentally obseleting the cheaper end of the aftermarket and it's addressed one of the criticisms of its design era- no single string kite system. That's just made crewing them more simple- which is good, as it means that you can take a less experienced crew out, widening the pool of potential crews to pick from.
To put it in real terms, and please I'm not criticising the Icon, but seeing redders' 400 at the FOM reminded me quite why I've always liked the 400- it looks like a real boat, and also just as modern as the new design 20 years later, which I also like as looks like a solid yacht rather than a.n.other overcanvassed tea tray. Great boats- excellent custodianship from the RS and the Owners- I hope it continues to be as popular as it has been to date. Edited by pondmonkey - 03 Nov 12 at 2:03pm |
||
![]() |
||
alstorer ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The class did make a good choice- whilst the full on square top and various other rig changes would have made the boat look better (I saw the prototype out testing), it would have done immense damage to the class.
|
||
-_
Al |
||
![]() |
||
Ruscoe ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I'm only joking guys hence the smiley. I agree completely with mike and restricted development or modification IMO is a must for a class to remain successful. The 400 is a smashing boat and I wouldn't look to far away from one if I was looking for a double hander with a mate.
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
Neptune ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 Jun 09 Location: Berkshire United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1314 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The irony was lost Ruscoe.
|
||
Musto Skiff and Solo sailor
|
||
![]() |
||
Oatsandbeans ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 19 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 382 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
When I heard that the luff curve was (allegedly) greater on the new sails, I assumed (again possibly wrongly) that this was done to get round the tendency for the rig to go over the front with the spinnaker up in a breeze. If this is the case you cant really knock RS for trying to make the boat easier to sail when its windy.
|
||
![]() |
||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Not to all... I sail 3 classes of boat, one of which (the Firefly) went through a lot of changes when Rondar took over building the boats, and has been a big success. Another, the Lightning, is still going through the aftermath of changes, but the initial prognosis is pretty good. New boats might be faster because they are new, not because there is a different builder, and new sail cloth and rudder shape are working their way into the fleet. The 3rd boat, the Minisail, falls into the "people buy them because they are so cheap" catagory Mike describes. All these classes needed or need change to stand a chance of keeping or starting fleet racing on a reasonable scale. But too much change or change in the wrong direction will kill them. The RS400 changes seem right to me, as the boat at our club which got new sails looked like a new boat with them up - very good looking. |
||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
As I understand it, we voted to keep the same shape, including set shape, of mainsail. RS chose to add some extra luff round, with the fine intention of encouraging people to sail with more prebend, reducing the number of mast breakages under extreme downwind conditions. However, many people are sailing with the same spreader settings. I suspect this has given heavier people a bit of an edge, particularly on courses with an excess of tight 3 sail reaches. In windward-leeward racing I think the difference is probably small. In our particular club racing, we find that sailing with old style sails, we can still occasionally beat the new boats, apart from feeling that our previous slight disadvantage on a tight reach ( we are a bit lighter than most, and my crew is not that strong) has been exaggerated a little, nothing has really changed. The new style sails are a small change compared with the variation between a good crew and an average crew. There must be some advantage in having a new boat, where all the fittings work properly, no scratches, no wear letting the foils wobble about etc. Also, not only are my sails the old style, they are well used. Maybe our tired jib is having more effect on tight reaches than I expect, or maybe I don't concentrate enough on the processional legs? |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1819202122 29> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |