Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Handicap racing now pointless? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 56789 14> |
Author | |||
Jack Sparrow ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2965 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 11 Jan 12 at 11:58am |
||
I don't see any, just a discussion. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Ruscoe ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Bit of a miss-quote there jack at least quote the whole post to put the 'Coin a phrase' into context...However Its a fairly heated discussion and to quote from the GGP thread which i think is in context:
And i f you read my post you will see i think its justified, but it highlights the problems clubs face every year by trying to adjust the PY system, the murmurings on this forum are no different to the heated debates by the blub bars...There needs to be a support network, the get out of jail card 'Clubs should adjust numbers for local conditions' just doesn't wash the volunteers in the sailing committees need some support from the RYA (I believe anyway) Edited by Ruscoe - 11 Jan 12 at 12:51pm |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I reckon it probably takes an hour to put together a half sensible reply to a query. Then that probably half of those will result in a second query because the recipient doesn't like the answer. Now multiply that by a hundred classes. How much volunteer time are we talking about?
And how much volunteer time do you suppose a club that is almost certainly already flat out making sure the event happens at all has got to spare? If I were the Great Lakes people, after the unacceptable abuse on this forum (as highlighted in the quote above) I would not be publishing a number or accepting entries from the B**** class at all next year. |
|||
![]() |
|||
jeffers ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Not arrogant at all it is fact that someone who is a mediocre sailor in 1 class can jump in to another class and be flattered by the boats performance.
We had a guy in our Laser fleet, very similar build to myself who switched classes and was then consistently beating all the Laser sailors he could not beat before on handicap.
To prove a point I borrowed a boat from said class from a very kind other sailor and went and cleaned up in a couple of races. It was surpising how easy it was to make the boat go fast with very little input (quite unrewarding I found).
Just my 2p and experience of course... Edited by jeffers - 11 Jan 12 at 1:16pm |
|||
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
|||
![]() |
|||
blaze720 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Quote .... "New class handicaps are recommended by the
manufacturer or class association and it is in their interest to set a lenient
handicap which gets the class noticed through results" Edited by blaze720 - 11 Jan 12 at 1:33pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Can I point out about my "stick a finger in the air" comment, if the finger in question has knowledge behind it, isn't a bad way of finding a trial number? However, if someone sticks a finger in the air and gets a number, then takes a few off for safety (fair enough) and then someone else sees the number, and takes a few more off, things do start to get rather a long way from where they started.
Someone earlier also mentioned handicapping related to the state of the boat, for a truly egalitarian handicapping system... At the CVRDA we have been doing this for years. As the point of the organization is to encourage classic boats with original kit to come out to sail, we need a system which gives old gear an advantage over new. We have been increasing the advantage slowly over the years, and I think still have a ways to go before we have made the playing field level - 60 year old cotton sails really are very slow compared to even 25 rear old dacron ones, let alone a new set! However, not sure this would translate well into mainstream racing... |
|||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|||
![]() |
|||
r2d2 ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 29 Sep 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 350 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Good positive suggestions Mike.
Possibly a bit difficult to marry use of 'recognised helms' with the average performance of the boat as represented by the PY - but I accept this is a minor quibble More important things that would help are that: 1) there should be a set minimum amount of data before the RYA publishes an EN for a new class. 2) any data used to produce an EN for a new class should be fully published by the RYA at the time the EN is published, together with any relevant notes e.g. regarding the types of conditions that the data were collected from Edited by r2d2 - 11 Jan 12 at 1:44pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
Jon711 ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 04 May 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 465 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Jim, to an extent I see your point, but, I think we are all aware that there are bandit PY boats out there. I do not believe the Blaze is one of them. We have some very good sailors in our fleet, and I know I have done well, if I come mid fleet. All we are asking for is transparency, when, an aribitary handicap for an event is issued.... To quote Jeremy Clarkson, "How hard can it be?"
To refer to another thread, maybe we will have to go with carbon masts, to be competitive on the punitive handicap the SJ organisers have decreed. I did not think my comments were unacceptable or abusive ( If they were Mark or Mags would have pulled them - so maybe the issue is with you?? Now Jim, you know, from the CVRDA forum, I will stand my ground, and defend my comments to the hilt. In a free society, we all surely have a right to free speech? maybe if the Blaze, was a New Zealand creation, you would not be so against it?) Jon Another thought occurs, most class associations are aware, of the relative speed of thier boats, compared to other classes, and, open discussions with relevant associations, by event organisers, may avoid this sort of discussion in the future..... It does need to be a two way street, to get the handicaps correct, just sticking a finger in the air and taking a (possibly educated) guess, does not foster good will..... Jon |
|||
Blaze 711
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Jack Sparrow ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2965 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
+1 to those three posts
(edit Jon slipped in there before me) Edited by Jack Sparrow - 11 Jan 12 at 1:56pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
marke ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 16 Jun 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 211 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Ah - now we are getting a bit more positive.
I think Mike's idea has merit - but could be hard to organise in practice. Getting 'good' sailors to give up their campaigns in their normal boats for long enough to get sufficient data might be hard. Though it might work with good sailors emerging from the junior classes who can't afford a new (or even reasonable boat). I still think it would help if a newish boat could turn up as an 'experimental' entry and race, but would not be eligible for prizes. This used to happen on an informal basis I think in the BM - I certainly remember the foilers racing but not being eligible for a prize - but would be better if it was a more formal process with a class declaring it. It would then mitigate the (in my view correct) tendency of race committees to be conservative when allocating PYs to new boats that would otherwise be eligible for prizes. |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 56789 14> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |