Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
New ladies skiff |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1415161718> |
Author | ||
Lukepiewalker ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 May 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1341 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 28 Oct 11 at 8:17pm |
|
Let's not forget the 1949/50 trials, but surely the point is by which metric are you defining the best? I think the chances of a clear obvious winner are unlikely in the current market. Depending on what shows up it 'may' be immediately obvious which ones are the also-rans but the ultimate deciding factors for the winner could be entirely unrelated to sailing performance.
|
||
Ex-Finn GBR533 "Pie Hard"
Ex-National 12 3253 "Seawitch" Ex-National 12 2961 "Curved Air" Ex-Mirror 59096 "Voodoo Chile" |
||
![]() |
||
alstorer ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Well quite- what do you think the change in RS800 rules is other than a form of lobbying by RS/LDC on behalf of the RS900? I'd challenge anyone from LDC to honestly deny that they don't think it might help them, even in a small way. |
||
-_
Al |
||
![]() |
||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Can I ask why you think the Olympic trials have found the wrong boats? The problem could be the amount of complete BS about such trials, not the results themselves.
The Finn won the 1949 trials for an Olympic and Scandanavian singlehander on the water fair and square. Have you ever seen the plans for the Spicle, the favourite and runner up? Seen in modern eyes it looks clearly inferior (as it was) and therefore the Finn's choice can hardly be criticised. It was actually very much an outsider, not a political favourite. The trials that chose the FD showed that the FD was clearly the fastest boat by a wide margin. Even before she got the genoa and trap she won, if I recall correctly, the last 7 races straight. The claim sometimes made about the Osprey beating the FD is completely incorrect; according to the three contemporary reports of the trials, complete with heat-by-heat breakdowns, that I hold. The Osprey only beat the FD once in about 17 races; the Hornet (great little boat) never did IIRC. In the second trials, the 505 "prototype" won but according to the 505 designer himself its performance advantage along over the FD was not sufficient for it to be chosen as an International class. So there is little objective doubt that the FD was a good choice. It may not suit the tastes of some people, but that doesn't mean it was the wrong boat. The next set of trials (IIRC) was the one for the new singlehanded dinghy. There were three sets of trials and the Contender won on the water from the Jeton and Unit. There was no real objective reason to think that was the wrong decision - for one example, modern tastes clearly prefer the Contender's wire over the planks used on the Unit and Jeton. Around the same time there was the trials for the three-man keelboat. Contemporary reports by people like Jack Knights, complete with finishing times, indicate how well the Soling did against the bigger boats. It's hard to see that it was a bad choice, although the pressure of Olympic competition stressed the ruleset. I have asked a couple of people who have been at the top of the Etchells and Soling, for example, which one they prefer and the answer is the Soling. What would you have preferred the IYRU to do - choose the much bigger Etchells, or the bigger and old-fashioned Trias or Van de Stadt designs? The two-person keelboat trials are hard to find information about, but some top class sailors appear to have honestly believed that the Tempest was the next big thing. The trials that chose the Dart 18 disregarded the restrictions placed on designers, but the story written down here was that the Aussie Cobra and Mosquito (IIRC) that went over were clearly less well developed than the Dart. IGiven the history of the Dart, it would seem to have been a reasonable choice (although not my type of boat, personally). Surely the 49er was the best boat at the "skiff" trials, where is was up against stuff like the Laser 5000 and Boss. The trials that chose the RSX were a complete fix IMHO. In the first round the existing longboards cleaned up so they were banned from the second trials, and the result was a horrible board that costs a lot and yet in some conditions is no quicker than the original Windsurfer - sorta like having a singlehanded skiff that can't beat a Finn. So exactly what "better boats" were beaten in ISAF trials? Maybe there were a couple, but the ISAF strike rate is probably one hell of a lot better than that of the major boatbuilders, or the sailing media. PS - Lukepiewalker makes an excellent point when he says that pure speed may not be the best metric. Edited by Chris 249 - 29 Oct 11 at 11:05am |
||
![]() |
||
Vronny ![]() Posting king ![]() Joined: 31 Mar 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 121 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Can't help thinking that having a design that piggy-backs on another (e.g. the Mackay skiff using the 49er hull and foils) must be the way forward to enable the maximum number of women around the world to have a chance in sailing a skiff. There must be a lot of older 49er hulls dotted around the world that girls could get hold of and then buy the new rig for. If everyone has to buy a complete new boat, that would put loads of people who are not sponsored or in a national squad at a huge disadvantage. The Ovington boat might be the best, or the RS boat, but, if it's for olympic competition, making sure that girls all around the world can access it, using a class that already is widespread makes sense. The only other class that fits the bill would be the 29erXX on that reckoning.
|
||
![]() |
||
Dougaldog ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 05 Nov 10 Location: hamble Online Status: Offline Posts: 356 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Those of you who also used to take/read 'Dinghy Sailing Magazine' may well remember that I did a series of articles, 'Trial by Jury' on how successful the Trial process can be - or not be.
I've a lot of detailed information going back to 1952, much of this might well be seen as contradicting some of the more popular beliefs already expressed here on the subject. It has to be remembered that back in the days of the IYRU, classes didn't get get hoiked up into the Olympics (think Laser/49er/Elliot 6), but instead got added to a list - the boats were then chosen from that list. So the Trials were not for a actual place in the Olympic Regatta, but for inclusion onto the A list - as that was the gateway to the 5 ring circus. In theory, the Contender AND Musto Skiff are both there on that list - somewhere!!
Did it go wrong..well, at times, yes it did. The same set of Trials that chose the Tornado also selected the Australis as the chosen A class - over the top of the superior, yet maybe not as pretty Unicorn, and in doing so put back the progress of the A class movement by many a year. The Unicorn as a cat may be dated now against the modern hi tech A class boats, but on Handicap are still well capable to giving good account for themselves.
As for the Contender - well.......here you have a classic example of a Committee setting out their criteria then moving the goal posts! (and not just once either). I covered this topic in detail in the book on the Contender, but suffice to say that the Contender 'winning on the water' was far from the case . As anyone who has put time in on the boat knows, it can be a frustrating pig of a boat in light airs and that is being generous to what is still one of the loveist boats to look at afloat. I've had the chance to sail the David Thomas Unit quite extensively and would say that in light to medium airs, the Unit was quicker upwind and down (thought entries to the Single handed Trials had been told that mere speed was only one factor). In addition, the Unit was the one leading boat that was not being sailed by a very high profile 'hot shot' helm, brought in for the event. Even so, had the IYRU had followed their own criteria, the Unit or Jeton could well have got the nod back at Weymouth...but as to the why...well, that's a long story.
As is the seletion of the 49er which was also far from straight forward, though here the pressures were very different. Sadly, the fear of official retribution precludes me going into more detail - let's just leave this one as a case of "the record books show that the 49er was selected".
Jim C and others wondering about the first Womens Skiff Trials - I'm sure I've covered this before on this forum but the simple answer is that they never happened. What went on down at Hyeres was just an indicative exercise for ISAF, so that they could - and I quote now from my own records of the time,"see what is out there". As such, the media were discouraged and stayed away - though in sheer bloody mindedness I did attend - the only journalist to do so.. Now just because it looked like a Trial, smelt like a trial and to the observer gave all the appearance of a trial it wasn't - ISAF still insist to this day it was only an indicative event. (For those of you who are RS Association Members, go back two issues of the RS Mag and you'll see my report on what happened there - suffice to say the GT60 looked great as did the newly redecked 800 - as far as I could see, these were the two boats that best 'hit the spot') NOTE: that view is taken as a 100% independant. I owe allegience to no one!!)
But come the Ladies Skiff Trials, will the 'best boat' win, for that is the real heart of the question. There is little doubt in my mind that the best boat for sailing/racing, the best overall package and the name of the boat finally selected, may end have very little in common - but that I am afraid is the heavily politic driven and comercial nature of the final decision making process!! (don't forget - the RYA has already shown a willingness to throw away it's long term investment in the 420 and 470, to cast a vote for what was then the almost untried version of the 29erXX)
Dougal
Bearfacemedia (as a journalist do I have to declare a commercial interest when writing something?) Edited by Dougaldog - 29 Oct 11 at 5:46pm |
||
Dougal H
|
||
![]() |
||
Andymac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Apr 07 Location: Derbyshire Online Status: Offline Posts: 852 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Agree totally.
|
||
![]() |
||
Skiffman ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 27 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 291 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
That is the 49er FX that I was talking about, great rig. Would really like one for the big breeze, with 155kgs on board it would be way faster than a normal 49er in over 20 knots!
Out of all the boats I think this is the best option
|
||
![]() |
||
Stargazey ![]() Groupie ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 May 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 45 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Winning races at 'trials' does not get the best boat. When a replacement for the Europe was being sought, the Olympic trials deemed the Byte CII as 'most suitable'. The Laser Radial was deemed 'least suitable' of the various boats on offer ... which makes its eventual selection a rather odd affair. |
||
![]() |
||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
When was there an Olympic trials series between the Laser Radial and the Byte CII? The Byte CII site doesn't refer to one. The ISAF press release about the selection makes no mention of one (seehttp://sailing.org.au/?page=13652&Format=,%20print,%20pda&MenuID=News%2F10537%2F0). Google gives no clue. I certainly cannot recall hearing of one, or reading of one. With respect, it's a bit harsh for ISAF to cop criticism for allegedly ignoring trials that apparently did not actually occur! If you are going to make such criticisms, could you please provide evidence that the trials occurred and of those results? |
||
![]() |
||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Interesting stuff, Dougal, but if the 49er wasn't the best boat then just about every press report of the time was wrong as far as I can see! Which boat do you claim was better - the extraordinarily heavy Laser 5000, the Boss which has died out, the B14, the Mach 2, or something else? Surely we need some evidence to conclude Seahorse and other mags and the Bethwaites and Michael Jackson (who are of course biased) are wrong. Where the published race times and reports inaccurate? Why was there a political fix and how come the 49er consortium out-politicked the powerful Laser UK and Topper companies? Surely we have to have some very strong evidence before claiming someone else made the wrong decision and for dubious reasons. Edited by Chris 249 - 30 Oct 11 at 3:30am |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1415161718> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |