New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: New ladies skiff
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

New ladies skiff

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1415161718>
Author
Lukepiewalker View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 24 May 06
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1341
Post Options Post Options   Quote Lukepiewalker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: New ladies skiff
    Posted: 28 Oct 11 at 8:17pm
Let's not forget the 1949/50 trials, but surely the point is by which metric are you defining the best? I think the chances of a clear obvious winner are unlikely in the current market. Depending on what shows up it 'may' be immediately obvious which ones are the also-rans but the ultimate deciding factors for the winner could be entirely unrelated to sailing performance.
Ex-Finn GBR533 "Pie Hard"
Ex-National 12 3253 "Seawitch"
Ex-National 12 2961 "Curved Air"
Ex-Mirror 59096 "Voodoo Chile"
Back to Top
alstorer View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 02 Aug 07
Location: Cambridge
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2899
Post Options Post Options   Quote alstorer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Oct 11 at 9:35pm
 
Originally posted by SSolo


Unfortunately I bet there will be a pile of backroom trading by the various national organisations eg RYA 

Well quite- what do you think the change in RS800 rules is other than a form of lobbying by RS/LDC on behalf of the RS900? I'd challenge anyone from LDC to honestly deny that they don't think it might help them, even in a small way.

-_
Al
Back to Top
Chris 249 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2041
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chris 249 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Oct 11 at 1:03am
Originally posted by Stargazey

Originally posted by SSolo

May the best boat win

And when has that ever happened in any Olympic sailing class trials ... ?

Can I ask why you think the Olympic trials have found the wrong boats? The problem could be the amount of complete BS about such trials, not the results themselves.
 
The Finn won the 1949 trials for an Olympic and Scandanavian singlehander on the water fair and square. Have you ever seen the plans for the Spicle, the favourite and runner up? Seen in modern eyes it looks clearly inferior (as it was) and therefore the Finn's choice can hardly be criticised. It was actually very much an outsider, not a political favourite.

The trials that chose the FD showed that the FD was clearly the fastest boat by a wide margin. Even before she got the genoa and trap she won, if I recall correctly, the last 7 races straight. The claim sometimes made about the Osprey beating the FD is completely incorrect; according to the three contemporary reports of the trials, complete with heat-by-heat breakdowns, that I hold. The Osprey only beat the FD once in about 17 races; the Hornet (great little boat) never did IIRC.

In the second trials, the 505 "prototype" won but according to the 505 designer himself its performance advantage along over the FD was not sufficient for it to be chosen as an International class.  So there is little objective doubt that the FD was a good choice. It may not suit the tastes of some people, but that doesn't mean it was the wrong boat.

The next set of trials (IIRC) was the one for the new singlehanded dinghy. There were three sets of trials and the Contender won on the water from the Jeton and Unit. There was no real objective reason to think that was the wrong decision - for one example, modern tastes clearly prefer the Contender's wire over the planks used on the Unit and Jeton.

Around the same time there was the trials for the three-man keelboat. Contemporary reports by people like Jack Knights, complete with finishing times, indicate how well the Soling did against the bigger boats. It's hard to see that it was a bad choice, although the pressure of Olympic competition stressed the ruleset. I have asked a couple of people who have been at the top of the Etchells and Soling, for example, which one they prefer and the answer is the Soling.

What would you have preferred the IYRU to do - choose the much bigger Etchells, or the bigger and old-fashioned Trias or Van de Stadt designs? 

The two-person keelboat trials are hard to find information about, but some top class sailors appear to have honestly believed that the Tempest was the next big thing.

The trials that chose the Dart 18 disregarded the restrictions placed on designers, but the story written down here was that the Aussie Cobra and Mosquito (IIRC) that went over were clearly less well developed than the Dart. IGiven the history of the Dart, it would seem to have been a reasonable choice (although not my type of boat, personally).

Surely the 49er was the best boat at the "skiff" trials, where is was up against stuff like the Laser 5000 and Boss.

The trials that chose the RSX were a complete fix IMHO. In the first round the existing longboards cleaned up so they were banned from the second trials, and the result was a horrible board that costs a lot and yet in some conditions is no quicker than the original Windsurfer - sorta like having a singlehanded skiff that can't beat a Finn.

So exactly what "better boats" were beaten in ISAF trials? Maybe there were a couple, but the ISAF strike rate is probably one hell of a lot better than that of the major boatbuilders, or the sailing media.

PS - Lukepiewalker makes an excellent point when he says that pure speed may not be the best metric.




Edited by Chris 249 - 29 Oct 11 at 11:05am
Back to Top
Vronny View Drop Down
Posting king
Posting king


Joined: 31 Mar 08
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 121
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vronny Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Oct 11 at 12:23pm
Can't help thinking that having a design that piggy-backs on another (e.g. the Mackay skiff using the 49er hull and foils) must be the way forward to enable the maximum number of women around the world to have a chance in sailing a skiff. There must be a lot of older 49er hulls dotted around the world that girls could get hold of and then buy the new rig for. If everyone has to buy a complete new boat, that would put loads of people who are not sponsored or in a national squad at a huge disadvantage. The Ovington boat might be the best, or the RS boat, but, if it's for olympic competition, making sure that girls all around the world can access it, using a class that already is widespread makes sense. The only other class that fits the bill would be the 29erXX on that reckoning.
Back to Top
Dougaldog View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 05 Nov 10
Location: hamble
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 356
Post Options Post Options   Quote Dougaldog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Oct 11 at 5:33pm
Those of you who also used to take/read 'Dinghy Sailing Magazine' may well remember that I did a series of articles, 'Trial by Jury' on how successful the Trial process can be - or not be.
 
I've a lot of detailed information going back to 1952, much of this might well be seen as contradicting some of the more popular beliefs already expressed here on the subject. It has to be remembered that back in the days of the IYRU, classes didn't get get hoiked up into the Olympics (think Laser/49er/Elliot 6), but instead  got added to a list - the boats were then chosen from that list. So the Trials were not for a actual  place in the Olympic Regatta, but for inclusion onto the A list - as that was the gateway to the 5 ring circus. In theory, the Contender AND Musto Skiff are both there on that list - somewhere!!
 
Did it go wrong..well, at times, yes it did. The same set of Trials that chose the Tornado also selected the Australis as the chosen A class - over the top of the superior, yet maybe not as pretty Unicorn, and in doing so put back the progress of the A class movement by many a year. The Unicorn as a cat may be dated now against the modern hi tech A class boats, but on Handicap are still well capable to giving good account for themselves.
 
As for the Contender - well.......here you have a classic example of a Committee setting out their criteria then moving the goal posts! (and not just once either). I covered this topic in detail in the book on the Contender, but suffice to say that the Contender 'winning on the water' was far from the case . As anyone who has put time in on the boat knows, it can be a frustrating pig of a boat in light airs and that is being generous to what is still one of the loveist boats to look at afloat. I've had the chance to sail the David Thomas Unit quite extensively and would say that in light to medium airs, the Unit was quicker upwind and down (thought entries to the Single handed Trials had been told that mere speed was only one factor). In addition, the Unit was the one leading boat that was not being sailed by a very high profile 'hot shot' helm, brought in for the event. Even so, had the IYRU had followed their own criteria, the Unit or Jeton could well have got the nod back at Weymouth...but as to the why...well, that's a long story.
 
As is the seletion of the 49er which was also far from straight forward, though here the pressures were very different. Sadly, the fear of official retribution precludes me going into more detail - let's just leave this one as a case of "the record books show that the 49er was selected".
 
Jim C and others wondering about the first Womens Skiff Trials - I'm sure I've covered this before on this forum but the simple answer is that they never happened. What went on down at Hyeres was just an indicative exercise for ISAF, so that they could - and I quote now from my own records of the time,"see what is out there".  As such, the media were discouraged and stayed away - though in sheer bloody mindedness I did attend - the only journalist to do so.. Now just because it looked like a Trial, smelt like a trial and to the observer gave all the appearance of a trial it wasn't - ISAF still insist to this day it was only an indicative event. (For those of you who are RS Association Members, go back two issues of the RS Mag and you'll see my report on what happened there -  suffice to say the GT60 looked great as did the newly redecked 800 - as far as I could see, these were the two boats that best 'hit the spot') NOTE: that view is taken as a 100% independant. I owe allegience to no one!!)
 
But come the Ladies Skiff Trials, will the 'best boat' win, for that is the real heart of the question.  There is little doubt in my mind that the best boat for sailing/racing, the best overall package and the name of the boat finally selected, may end have very little in common - but that I am afraid is the heavily politic driven and comercial nature of the final decision making process!! (don't forget - the RYA has already shown a willingness to throw away it's long term investment in the 420 and 470, to cast a vote for what was then the almost untried version of the 29erXX)
 
Dougal
Bearfacemedia (as a journalist do I have to declare a commercial interest when writing something?)


Edited by Dougaldog - 29 Oct 11 at 5:46pm
Dougal H
Back to Top
Andymac View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Apr 07
Location: Derbyshire
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 852
Post Options Post Options   Quote Andymac Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Oct 11 at 6:02pm
Originally posted by Lukepiewalker

<<snip>> but surely the point is by which metric are you defining the best? <<snip>> Depending on what shows up it 'may' be immediately obvious which ones are the also-rans but the ultimate deciding factors for the winner could be entirely unrelated to sailing performance.
 
Agree totally.
Back to Top
Skiffman View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 27 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 291
Post Options Post Options   Quote Skiffman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Oct 11 at 6:05pm
That is the 49er FX that I was talking about, great rig. Would really like one for the big breeze, with 155kgs on board it would be way faster than a normal 49er in over 20 knots!

Out of all the boats I think this is the best option
49er GBR5

teamfletcherandsign.co.uk
Team Fletcher and Sign campaign site
Back to Top
Stargazey View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 15 May 10
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 45
Post Options Post Options   Quote Stargazey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Oct 11 at 6:35pm

Winning races at 'trials' does not get the best boat.  When a replacement for the Europe was being sought, the Olympic trials deemed the Byte CII as 'most suitable'.  The Laser Radial was deemed 'least suitable' of the various boats on offer ... which makes its eventual selection a rather odd affair.

Back to Top
Chris 249 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2041
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chris 249 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Oct 11 at 2:39am
Originally posted by Stargazey

Winning races at 'trials' does not get the best boat.  When a replacement for the Europe was being sought, the Olympic trials deemed the Byte CII as 'most suitable'.  The Laser Radial was deemed 'least suitable' of the various boats on offer ... which makes its eventual selection a rather odd affair.


When was there an Olympic trials series between the Laser Radial and the Byte CII?

The Byte CII site doesn't refer to one. The ISAF press release about the selection makes no mention of one (seehttp://sailing.org.au/?page=13652&Format=,%20print,%20pda&MenuID=News%2F10537%2F0). 

Google gives no clue. I certainly cannot recall hearing of one, or reading of one. 

With respect, it's a bit harsh for ISAF to cop criticism for allegedly ignoring trials that apparently did not actually occur!  If you are going to make such criticisms, could you please provide evidence that the trials occurred and of those results?


Back to Top
Chris 249 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2041
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chris 249 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Oct 11 at 3:29am
Originally posted by Dougaldog

Those of you who also used to take/read 'Dinghy Sailing Magazine' may well remember that I did a series of articles, 'Trial by Jury' on how successful the Trial process can be - or not be.
 
I've a lot of detailed information going back to 1952, much of this might well be seen as contradicting some of the more popular beliefs already expressed here on the subject. It has to be remembered that back in the days of the IYRU, classes didn't get get hoiked up into the Olympics (think Laser/49er/Elliot 6), but instead  got added to a list - the boats were then chosen from that list. So the Trials were not for a actual  place in the Olympic Regatta, but for inclusion onto the A list - as that was the gateway to the 5 ring circus. In theory, the Contender AND Musto Skiff are both there on that list - somewhere!!
 
Did it go wrong..well, at times, yes it did. The same set of Trials that chose the Tornado also selected the Australis as the chosen A class - over the top of the superior, yet maybe not as pretty Unicorn, and in doing so put back the progress of the A class movement by many a year. The Unicorn as a cat may be dated now against the modern hi tech A class boats, but on Handicap are still well capable to giving good account for themselves.

The Unicorn may well have been the better boat to select, but is there much evidence that the Australia was inferior?  According to Modern Boating magazine's report, Australis scored a DNF, capsized (no place given in reports), 3,1,1,1,1 (but race abandoned after everyone rounded the wrong mark), 2 and won the points series of the trials.

Australis had her defects, like the curved beams which were expensive, but winning three or four races and getting the points for the series surely indicates that it was not inferior. My info, from A Class champs of the time, is that the issue was with the marketing by the designer, not the boat. 

I'm NOT saying she was the best boat to my knowledge - after all, canoe sterns and super-slim hulls are not very popular today but then again the Australis bows look pretty modern - but on what evidence was she clearly inferior?

As for the Contender - well.......here you have a classic example of a Committee setting out their criteria then moving the goal posts! (and not just once either). I covered this topic in detail in the book on the Contender, but suffice to say that the Contender 'winning on the water' was far from the case . As anyone who has put time in on the boat knows, it can be a frustrating pig of a boat in light airs and that is being generous to what is still one of the loveist boats to look at afloat. I've had the chance to sail the David Thomas Unit quite extensively and would say that in light to medium airs, the Unit was quicker upwind and down (thought entries to the Single handed Trials had been told that mere speed was only one factor). In addition, the Unit was the one leading boat that was not being sailed by a very high profile 'hot shot' helm, brought in for the event. Even so, had the IYRU had followed their own criteria, the Unit or Jeton could well have got the nod back at Weymouth...but as to the why...well, that's a long story.

I can't find my records on the second trials, but I'm fairly sure that the results show a clear victory to the Contender. If you think that is incorrect, can you please provide the results?

I'll try to find my contemporary reports. I'm fairly sure that guys like Jack Knights said that the Contender was clearly quicker overall.

As is the seletion of the 49er which was also far from straight forward, though here the pressures were very different. Sadly, the fear of official retribution precludes me going into more detail - let's just leave this one as a case of "the record books show that the 49er was selected".
 
Again, press reports in Seahorse for example were unanimous in praising the 49er as the best boat. The chief selector was so impressed that he bought one.

Do you really think that the Boss or 5000 were better boats?

Jim C and others wondering about the first Womens Skiff Trials - I'm sure I've covered this before on this forum but the simple answer is that they never happened. What went on down at Hyeres was just an indicative exercise for ISAF, so that they could - and I quote now from my own records of the time,"see what is out there".  As such, the media were discouraged and stayed away - though in sheer bloody mindedness I did attend - the only journalist to do so.. Now just because it looked like a Trial, smelt like a trial and to the observer gave all the appearance of a trial it wasn't - ISAF still insist to this day it was only an indicative event. (For those of you who are RS Association Members, go back two issues of the RS Mag and you'll see my report on what happened there -  suffice to say the GT60 looked great as did the newly redecked 800 - as far as I could see, these were the two boats that best 'hit the spot') NOTE: that view is taken as a 100% independant. I owe allegience to no one!!)
 
But come the Ladies Skiff Trials, will the 'best boat' win, for that is the real heart of the question.  There is little doubt in my mind that the best boat for sailing/racing, the best overall package and the name of the boat finally selected, may end have very little in common - but that I am afraid is the heavily politic driven and comercial nature of the final decision making process!! (don't forget - the RYA has already shown a willingness to throw away it's long term investment in the 420 and 470, to cast a vote for what was then the almost untried version of the 29erXX)
 
Dougal
Bearfacemedia (as a journalist do I have to declare a commercial interest when writing something?)

Interesting stuff, Dougal, but if the 49er wasn't the best boat then just about every press report of the time was wrong as far as I can see!

Which boat do you claim was better - the extraordinarily heavy Laser 5000, the Boss which has died out, the B14, the Mach 2, or something else?

Surely we need some evidence to conclude Seahorse and other mags and the Bethwaites and Michael Jackson (who are of course biased) are wrong. Where the published race times and reports inaccurate?

Why was there a political fix and how come the 49er consortium out-politicked the powerful Laser UK and Topper companies?

Surely we have to have some very strong evidence before claiming someone else made the wrong decision and for dubious reasons. 


Edited by Chris 249 - 30 Oct 11 at 3:30am
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1415161718>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy