Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
AC man overboard; penalty |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | ||
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 22 Aug 11 at 10:20pm |
|
You win a little something from Teaky's desk.
Congratulations. A management consultant would never have known that answer.
|
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Because 18 footers didn't use IYRU rules in the old days? |
||
![]() |
||
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I think we are both fumbling around with the same ideas and directions.
Indeed the 18 footers were reputed for dropping excess crew off at the windward mark. No records of sharks ever taking a sailor around Sydney. Legend hath it that this practice was the cause of the present rule rules. Bonus points to anyone who can tell us why this is just a legend.
|
||
![]() |
||
Scooby_simon ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 02 Apr 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2415 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Yes; a lomg time ago; the 18 footers did dump crew at the end of the last beat.
|
||
Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
||
![]() |
||
Andymac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Apr 07 Location: Derbyshire Online Status: Offline Posts: 852 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() Thanks Brass, I did like that. I wasn't saying that there was a fundamental 'rule of seamanship', rather should there be one? I am very much of the same opinion as you. My OP was very much an open question seeking opinion on this development. Re; the Bermuda fitted dinghy, is it my poor memory or did this practice of jettisoning 'crew ballast' at the last windward mark also exist in the early days of 18foot skiff racing? has anyone been known to have drowned whilst participating in this practice? or do the sharks get them first? |
||
![]() |
||
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Firstly, there is no rule in the RRS that obliges a boat to sail in a seamanlike manner or obey 'rules of seamanship', fundamanetal or otherwise.
It's not a fundamental rule of seamanship to 'finish with the crew intact'. It is perfectly seamanlike to have the crew diminish during a voyage for any number of reasons, death, evacuation for various reasons, taken by aliens etc etc.
It's not even a requirement of rule 47.2 (yes alstorer, I do know where to find that one), which contains obvious exceptions.
People racing sailboats do things that are unseamanlike all the time: hiking, trapezing, gybing spinnaker poles on heaving foredecks. There's even a still small voice inside me that says even sailing aboard one of those AC freakboats is an act of poor seamanship.
The point of my previous post was to indicate that I don't really think that this sets a seriously bad example to other sailors.
That's not to say that I don't dislike the attitude that 'we're AC, we're too cool for rules'. Edited by Brass - 22 Aug 11 at 1:36am |
||
![]() |
||
Roger ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 23 Mar 04 Location: Somerset Online Status: Offline Posts: 524 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Of course there is always the Bermuda Fitted Dinghy, with their unique rule.... A unique rule to racing states that the number of crew to finish a race can be less than the number that started. This can encourage boats to have crew dive off the transom during a race to push the boat forward, help lighten the boat and increase performance. I seem to remember Y&Y doing an article on the class some years ago, massively overcanvassed dinghies, now with various rigs for different wind strengths, a crew of 6 (at the start at least), very little freeboard and require constant bailing. |
||
![]() |
||
Contender 541 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 05 Location: Burton on Trent Online Status: Offline Posts: 1402 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
IIRC there was a case a few editions ago where crew were being deliberately 'dumped' on the final downwind leg as they were no longer required for the sailing of the boat and were therefore excess balast.
As you say, it's the AC - they do what they want
|
||
When you find a big kettle of crazy it's probably best not to stir it - Pointy Haired Boss
Crew on 505 8780 |
||
![]() |
||
Stuart O ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 Jul 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I think this is a carry on from the AC proper when both teams agreed that because of speed and maouverability incase of MOB they wouldnt turn back and be picked up by a chase rib. Im assuming that they are getting teams used to working with the rules before the next AC |
||
![]() |
||
alstorer ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The RRS say that you've got recover crew that go over board before continuing your race. In your IC example, the little darling can be protested and disqualified. To be honest though, the modified rules used by the AC45s in this respect are probably safer in the specific case of those boats and the way they race- presumably if it had been mid leg he'd have picked up by a rib swiftly; at the mark he was able to get quickly to the mark boat and thus out of danger. |
||
-_
Al |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |