New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Feckin Ecclestone....
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Feckin Ecclestone....

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
chrisg View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 07
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 893
Post Options Post Options   Quote chrisg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Feckin Ecclestone....
    Posted: 31 Jul 11 at 11:25pm
Anyone else annoyed about the BBC losing the rights to screen all F1 races live next year? If you want to see them live you'll have to line the pockets of the Murdoch's.

I've thought the current coverage is some of the best ever! And some of the races have been slightly interesting too.....
Back to Top
bert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 05
Location: norwich usually
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Post Options Post Options   Quote bert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Aug 11 at 4:31am

I thought it was in the rumour stage & the teams hadn`t seen how it affects them because the sponsors will leave if you have to have sky to watch the race series.

10 million regular viewers on BBC 10 million sky subscribers’.the numbers don`t add up to me.
 
No team Sponsor`s No money for the teams to produce the cars to race.
Phantom 1181
AC-227 IC 304
blaze / halo 586


Back to Top
jeffers View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3048
Post Options Post Options   Quote jeffers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Aug 11 at 8:14am
I thought the concorde agreement stated that the coverage should be on Free to Air TV where possible...in the UK it is definitely possible so you may find that FOTA have something to say about this and something may have to be dine, there is an article on BBC Sport about it so it seems a little more than just rumours.....
 
Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
Back to Top
Mark Jardine View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 12 Mar 04
Location: Milford-on-Sea, United King
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1028
Post Options Post Options   Quote Mark Jardine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Aug 11 at 8:15am
Back to Top
alstorer View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 02 Aug 07
Location: Cambridge
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2899
Post Options Post Options   Quote alstorer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Aug 11 at 9:23am
As well as a carefully worded bit at the start of the coverage explicitly about the deal, did anyone else notice the subtle mentions of it throught- especially from Brundle, who's vented elsewhere about it? Bernie seemed pretty unwilling to talk on the grid as well...
-_
Al
Back to Top
Laser 173312 View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 08 May 07
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 416
Post Options Post Options   Quote Laser 173312 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Aug 11 at 9:41am
We will give F1 the full Sky Sports treatment
 
This is the worrying part, it means a 2 hour race will need a 5 hour show!
 
As long as the BBC show Monaco, Silverstone, Spa, Monza and the last race I'll be happy. Sky can happily have Singapore, I hate that race.
 
 
Back to Top
alstorer View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 02 Aug 07
Location: Cambridge
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2899
Post Options Post Options   Quote alstorer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Aug 11 at 9:56am

To be fair, BBC gives over 3 hours to a 2 hr race plus the additional hour and a half or so on the red button- plus full coverage of qualification and every practice session.

-_
Al
Back to Top
chrisg View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 07
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 893
Post Options Post Options   Quote chrisg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Aug 11 at 2:33pm
I think the concorde agreement had a loophole added that said something along the lines of the rights holder had to ensure that not all coverage was on a pay to view channel. So, as the BBC will have some races live next year they are in the clear on that one.

Something fishy is definitely going on. I've read further that it wasnt actually Ecclestone who brokered this deal but that in the BBC cost cutting measures (£900m to move to Manchester anyone) they couldnt afford to honour the remaining period of their contract - to the end of 2013. Bernie said it wasnt down to him to sort out so the BBC went to Sky to partner them. Apparently if the BBC had pulled out wholly then the F1 people would have had to go to a free to air channel and Channel 5 had offered whatever Sky were offering for coverage. But the BBC don't view Sky as a direct competitor but do ITV, Channel 4 and 5 etc so by keeping some races effectively closed the door for any other terrestrial channel in the UK to bid for the whole shebang. Plus the murdoch's are currently trying to buy F1 company which may have had something to do with it...

What I also don't understand is why the teams are swallowing Bernies line that this will increase viewing figures, must be the promise of the additional £1m payment they are being offered from the deal. It's weird becaue every Sky customer can already watch F1 on the BBC, but not every BBC viewer will be able to watch Sky Sports. So how does that improve ratings?

Can you imagine the uproar if the BBC decided they could only afford to show every other episode of Eastenders next year? I heard that the viewing figures for yesterdays F1 was +6m. The most watched program on any channel in the UK. Niche sport huh?

I loved all of the little digs in the commentary over the weekend - Brundle opened with " the Skys closing in", right through to where during the forum afterwards the three presenters went to talk to the crowd and someone grabbed the microphone and said we dont want sky. Jake Humphreys did a really fake shocked look. Brilliant.

And breathe.... Apologies. rant over.....

p.s. over 6000 negative replies to the head of BBC F1's blog so far - do you think they get the picture yet?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/sporteditors/2011/07/f1_coverage_to_be_shared_betwe.html


Edited by chrisg - 01 Aug 11 at 2:34pm
Back to Top
Jack Sparrow View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 08 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2965
Post Options Post Options   Quote Jack Sparrow Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Aug 11 at 4:39pm
If that is how it went down, the BBC seem to be attempting to write there own death warrant. Ummm... Lets find the best way to migrate as many loyal BBC viewers to a subscription channel and make the license fee debate even harder to argue.
Back to Top
chrisg View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 07
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 893
Post Options Post Options   Quote chrisg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Aug 11 at 6:04pm
Of course what I read may be misinformation being spread by FOM....

As I said I'm sure something fishy is going on.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy