Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Streaker PY number |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1213141516> |
Author | |||
G.R.F. ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 10 Aug 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 4028 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 12 Jan 11 at 10:03pm |
||
You're right of course, and Dumb & Dumberer don't ask for it to be unfairly advantaged, no more than the Alto mob do much to prevent the opposite, it ain't cricket to complain, (That's my self appointed task to which I set about using My trusty Sword of Irony and Shield of Sarcasm). But who's to say dark forces don't use the anomalies against us for commercial gain? Who suffers?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
maxibuddah ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Mar 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1760 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
who's to say that they do???
the answer depends on quite how cynical you are, but of remember Woody Allen's words, "Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean that they are not out to get me"......maybe there is some truth in your words, maybe there isn't, and I don't expect that we will ever find out, unless of course you ply them with copious amounts of alcohol and take pictures of them in compromising positions with a squirrel....
|
|||
Everything I say is my opinion, honest
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I considered a V3000 a couple of years ago, great boat and would suit us perfectly......and I decided I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole. Too much controversy with the PY and the CA don't seem that intrested in sorting it out. After talking to one or two wilsonians I concluded the questionable PY could be what stopped the class taking off.
Is the PY the CA's problem??........If it stops the boat selling then it will be
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Late starter ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 24 Feb 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 481 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
That is an interesting point. Generally speaking I think its mainly down to clubs to submit returns, and the RYA to adminster the PY scheme. However, I've sometimes thought that where there has been a clear "Mk1" and "Mk2" development within a class then the CA may want to consider suggesting recommended yardstick adjustments. I'd be interested in what Bas from RYA technical thinks of that, he sometimes posts here. (For those that don't know Bas he's the guy that runs the PY scheme for the RYA). |
|||
![]() |
|||
oldarn ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Apr 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 440 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
+1 Firstly by the way, at DYC the Streaker wins nearly everything, to the extent it is killing off other classes! The last thing the AltO can be is a bandit five oh. It is slower and as GRF says it is an AltO. It has less upwind area and massively less kite area. To computer design the hull would have been a luxury. The history of its developement would clarify its reasons and origins. Yet to be written! In fact the five oh hull was taken as a start for many reasons, one of which was that to this day it is doubtful if a better (non skiff) large dinghy has yet been deigned even with the benefit of CAD. The original design was as a non trapeze, fast, comfortable, easy to sail dinghy and the PY was pitched at about 950. It appeared to sail slightly slower that the 400. It did finally become a two person single trapeze boat and as such returns from one club give a pn of 937 and at another club 952. Even with these results it has continued to be sailed off 930 locally, but at several meetings last year it was sailed off 925. The 937 and 952 figures were from results from average sailors trapezing.. The soon to be published class rules clearly state that any proposed changes in future cannot be considered if it they are likely to increase speed and thus devalue older boats and put downward pressure on its PY. Unfortunately nothing is perfect, but we can only try! Edited by oldarn - 13 Jan 11 at 10:11am |
|||
thefastexcitingrunningasymmetric
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Andrewst ![]() Posting king ![]() Joined: 14 Aug 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 129 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I tend to actually agree with this. I know the builder would love to as a "sexy " low handicap applied to the boat as he will sell more.
I would like it as will mean more boat to sail with. I can sail in the fleet (fast asysmetics) who have similar charateristics over the varies wind strengths.
All I can do it get out there and raise the class profile speak to race officers and hopfully influence the RYA PY.
As oldarn says "Unfortunately nothing is perfect, but we can only try!" Edited by Andrewst - 13 Jan 11 at 10:21am |
|||
![]() |
|||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I think the RYA need to be hotter on this when issuing their annual numbers and they can only do this with the help of the classes. There is no doubt that the Rooster streaker with the right sails is significantly faster than its existing PY.
If the class associations monitored the classes, then where there is a class approved change in materials or shape which is performance enhancing, they should provide a return to the RYA who could then set a trial number for new boats. Any builder who also has finalised changes should also be required to notify such changes to both the class association and the RYA. Of course, in both cases above, those parties may have a vested interest in not doing so!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
oldarn ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Apr 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 440 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
+1 |
|||
thefastexcitingrunningasymmetric
|
|||
![]() |
|||
hollandsd ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Oct 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 853 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() as you can see, we reccomend 1007 as a handicap. Myself and andrew suggest 985 at events when we go. We want the RYA to have a split handicap as we asked at the dinghy show last year, but we ended up being grouped as one return with a note that the Laser 3000 handicap included Vandercraft boats. We dont sail the boat to win races but to go out and have a good time, if we pick up a few wins on the way thats because we've put in the hours of practice and are having fun. Dan Edited by hollandsd - 13 Jan 11 at 10:54am |
|||
Laser 184084
Tasar 3501 RS600 698 RS600 782 |
|||
![]() |
|||
Vronny ![]() Posting king ![]() Joined: 31 Mar 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 121 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I can understand that the AltO is likely to end up with a PY slower than the 505, but I'm surprised if it's slower than the Javelin (PY 926). I've never sailed a Javelin but know people who have and I've raced against them in my Fireball. It always seemed like a straightforward sort of boat. Not as hi-tec and clever as the 505 but, in the right hands, good on all points of sailing. Please don't say the AltO won't match this!
|
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1213141516> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |