New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Streaker PY number
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Streaker PY number

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1213141516>
Author
G.R.F. View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 10 Aug 08
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4028
Post Options Post Options   Quote G.R.F. Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Streaker PY number
    Posted: 12 Jan 11 at 10:03pm
Originally posted by maxibuddah

Originally posted by G.R.F.

Which is why it's so wrong that Bandits like the V3000 get to use the L3k handicap, yet the Alto gets unfairly compared with a boat with 20% more sail area..

Is that actually the V3000 class fault or the PY system? When more V3000's get into the results and returns go to the RYA then their PY will deminish. I think you'll find that the name L3000 and V3000 are two different names, bit like the AC & IC really. No-one is pretending that they are the same boat, are they?

You're right of course, and Dumb & Dumberer don't ask for it to be unfairly advantaged, no more than the Alto mob do much to prevent the opposite, it ain't cricket to complain, (That's my self appointed task to which I set about using My trusty Sword of Irony and Shield of Sarcasm).

But who's to say dark forces don't use the anomalies against us for commercial gain?

Who suffers?
Back to Top
maxibuddah View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 09
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1760
Post Options Post Options   Quote maxibuddah Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Jan 11 at 10:40pm
who's to say that they do???
the answer depends on quite how cynical you are, but of remember Woody Allen's words, "Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean that they are not out to get me"......maybe there is some truth in your words, maybe there isn't, and I don't expect that we will ever find out, unless of course you ply them with copious amounts of alcohol and take pictures of them in compromising positions with a squirrel....
Everything I say is my opinion, honest
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Jan 11 at 9:41am
I considered a V3000 a couple of years ago, great boat and would suit us perfectly......and I decided I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole. Too much controversy with the PY and the CA don't seem that intrested in sorting it out. After talking to one or two wilsonians I concluded the questionable PY could be what stopped the class taking off.
 
Is the PY the CA's problem??........If it stops the boat selling then it will be Wink
Back to Top
Late starter View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 24 Feb 07
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 481
Post Options Post Options   Quote Late starter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Jan 11 at 10:05am
Originally posted by GK.LaserII

Is the PY the CA's problem??........If it stops the boat selling then it will be Wink

That is an interesting point. Generally speaking I think its mainly down to clubs to submit returns, and the RYA to adminster the PY scheme.  However, I've sometimes thought that where there has been a clear "Mk1" and "Mk2" development within a class then the CA may want to consider suggesting recommended yardstick adjustments.

I'd be interested in what Bas from RYA technical thinks of that, he sometimes posts here. (For those that don't know Bas he's the guy that runs the PY scheme for the RYA).
Back to Top
oldarn View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 07
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 440
Post Options Post Options   Quote oldarn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Jan 11 at 10:06am

Originally posted by G.R.F.

Originally posted by JimC

Originally posted by G.R.F.

...what these modern computer programmes can do to speed up hull shapes

hang on, is this the same guy who in another thread was complaining that the lighter and very considerably hull shape tweaked Alto was given the same handicap as a 505?


Yes but they didn't call it a 505 did they?

My point precisely, they're not trying the easy route, which would be just to build one down to weight (if that was possible within their rules) It's an entirely different boat, similar in length but that's where the similarity ends.

Not difficult to spot the two bloody great chines down the hull.

Or the self tacking jib, pole system and flat deck.

Which is why it's so wrong that Bandits like the V3000 get to use the L3k handicap, yet the Alto gets unfairly compared with a boat with 20% more sail area..


+1

Firstly by the way, at DYC the Streaker wins nearly everything, to the extent it is killing off other classes!

The last thing the AltO can be is a bandit five oh. It is slower and as GRF says it is an AltO.
It has less upwind area and massively less kite area.

To computer design the hull would have been a luxury. The history of its developement would clarify its reasons and origins. Yet to be written! In fact the five oh hull was taken as a start for many reasons, one of which was that to this day it is doubtful if a better (non skiff) large dinghy has yet been deigned even with the benefit of CAD.

The original design was as a non trapeze, fast, comfortable, easy to sail dinghy and the PY was pitched at about 950. It appeared to sail slightly slower that the 400.  It did finally become a two person single trapeze boat  and as such returns from one club give a pn of 937 and at another club 952. Even with these results it has continued to be sailed off 930 locally, but at several meetings last year it was sailed off 925. The 937 and 952 figures were from results  from average sailors trapezing..

The soon to be published class rules clearly state that any proposed changes in future cannot be considered if it they are likely to increase speed and thus devalue older boats and put downward pressure on its PY.

Unfortunately nothing is perfect, but we can only try!


Edited by oldarn - 13 Jan 11 at 10:11am
thefastexcitingrunningasymmetric
Back to Top
Andrewst View Drop Down
Posting king
Posting king


Joined: 14 Aug 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 129
Post Options Post Options   Quote Andrewst Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Jan 11 at 10:18am
Originally posted by Late starter

[QUOTE=GK.LaserII]
Is the PY the CA's problem??........If it stops the boat selling then it will be Wink

I tend to actually agree with this.
I know the builder would love to as a "sexy " low handicap applied to the boat as he will sell more.
I would like it as will mean more boat to sail with. I can sail in the fleet (fast asysmetics) who have similar charateristics over the varies wind strengths.
All I can do it get out there and raise the class profile speak to race officers and hopfully influence the RYA PY.
 
As oldarn says "Unfortunately nothing is perfect, but we can only try!"


Edited by Andrewst - 13 Jan 11 at 10:21am
3000 3611 Chaos
B14 790

www.AllGoodFun.com

B14 709 For Sale
RS800 898 For Sale
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Jan 11 at 10:39am
I think the RYA need to be hotter on this when issuing their annual numbers and they can only do this with the help of the classes. There is no doubt that the Rooster streaker with the right sails is significantly faster than its existing PY. 

If the class associations monitored the classes, then where there is a class approved change in materials or shape which is performance enhancing, they should provide a return to the RYA who could then set a trial number for new boats. Any builder who also has finalised changes should also be required to notify such changes to both the class association and the RYA.

Of course, in both cases above, those parties may have a vested interest in not doing so!
Back to Top
oldarn View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 07
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 440
Post Options Post Options   Quote oldarn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Jan 11 at 10:47am
Originally posted by SimonW99


There is no doubt that the Rooster streaker with the right sails is significantly faster than its existing PY. 

If the class associations monitored the classes, then where there is a class approved change in materials or shape which is performance enhancing, they should provide a return to the RYA who could then set a trial number for new boats. Any builder who also has finalised changes should also be required to notify such changes to both the class association and the RYA.

Of course, in both cases above, those parties may have a vested interest in not doing so!


+1
thefastexcitingrunningasymmetric
Back to Top
hollandsd View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 06
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 853
Post Options Post Options   Quote hollandsd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Jan 11 at 10:47am
Originally posted by GK.LaserII

I considered a V3000 a couple of years ago, great boat and would suit us perfectly......and I decided I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole. Too much controversy with the PY and the CA don't seem that intrested in sorting it out. After talking to one or two wilsonians I concluded the questionable PY could be what stopped the class taking off.
 
Is the PY the CA's problem??........If it stops the boat selling then it will be Wink




as you can see, we reccomend 1007 as a handicap.

Myself and andrew suggest 985 at events when we go.

We want the RYA to have a split handicap as we asked at the dinghy show last year, but we ended up being grouped as one return with a note that the Laser 3000 handicap included Vandercraft boats.


We dont sail the boat to win races but to go out and have a good time, if we pick up a few wins on the way thats because we've put in the hours of practice and are having fun.

Dan


Edited by hollandsd - 13 Jan 11 at 10:54am
Laser 184084
Tasar 3501
RS600 698
RS600 782
Back to Top
Vronny View Drop Down
Posting king
Posting king


Joined: 31 Mar 08
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 121
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vronny Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Jan 11 at 10:53am
Originally posted by oldarn



The last thing the AltO can be is a bandit five oh. It is slower and as GRF says it is an AltO.
It has less upwind area and massively less kite area.

To computer design the hull would have been a luxury. The history of its developement would clarify its reasons and origins. Yet to be written! In fact the five oh hull was taken as a start for many reasons, one of which was that to this day it is doubtful if a better (non skiff) large dinghy has yet been deigned even with the benefit of CAD.

The original design was as a non trapeze, fast, comfortable, easy to sail dinghy and the PY was pitched at about 950. It appeared to sail slightly slower that the 400.  It did finally become a two person single trapeze boat  and as such returns from one club give a pn of 937 and at another club 952. Even with these results it has continued to be sailed off 930 locally, but at several meetings last year it was sailed off 925. The 937 and 952 figures were from results  from average sailors trapezing..

The soon to be published class rules clearly state that any proposed changes in future cannot be considered if it they are likely to increase speed and thus devalue older boats and put downward pressure on its PY.
 
Unfortunately nothing is perfect, but we can only try!
 
I can understand that the AltO is likely to end up with a PY slower than the 505, but I'm surprised if it's slower than the Javelin (PY 926). I've never sailed a Javelin but know people who have  and I've raced against them in my Fireball. It always seemed like a straightforward sort of boat. Not as hi-tec and clever as the 505 but, in the right hands, good on all points of sailing. Please don't say the AltO won't match this!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1213141516>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy