Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Laying the windward mark |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234> |
Author | |
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 02 Jul 10 at 1:22pm |
I think a lot of the criticism of club race officers is born of the fact that its a damn sight easier to set a decent course on the sea with steady winds.
Lets face it, if you can't set a half decent course in Portland Harbour at Weymouth when there's a reasonably steady breeze then you probably should consider manning the galley rather than the committee boat next time. On the other hand if you're setting a course on the gravel pit at Much-Tickling-in-the-Marsh SC then you've got to consider: the wind shadow from the trees up near marks 4 and 5 in an Easterly, but 3 and 4 in a N Easterly, the persistent backing of the wind in the top rightcorner if its westerly, or veering if its gone round to the North, the shifting wind coming round Top hill, which means that a beat on the left hand side of the lake is about 10 degrees backed compared the the right hand side if the wind is between 300 and 360 degrees, but the reverse between 250 and 300... the shallow patch near the west end of the dinghy park where you mustn't set an upwind leg, but is OK to send people through on a run unless you've got the asymmettric class in the race... and when you've struggled with all that and a 45 degree windshift 5 minutes after the start some little **** comes up after the race and tells you what a crap course you set, and how much better the race management is at Weymouth... Edited by JimC |
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've come to the (controversial) conclusion that if you do that (its traditional at my club too) the almost inevitable result is that you will get a fetch on every lap because if the wind swings one way one will be a fetch, if the other way the other one will be unless the angles are so close to each other they have no practical effect anyway. I've been doing a lot of thinking about courses at my club, and although I'm sure noone agrees with me, the conclusion I've come to (for the moment: probably change my mind after I get to try it!) is that a good option for medium sized inland venues would be a lower case d shaped course: effectively a sausage on top of a triangle, with a gate/start at the top of the triangle. The triangle would have legs about 2/3rds length of the sausage, and you'd look to aggressively move the windward mark in a radius round the gate to cope with windshifts, but leave the triangle unaltered no matter what. Ideally one leg of the triangle would be a good spinnaker reach, one too shy for kites, and one a beat. The sketch shows what I'd aim for in the centre, and the effect of 45 degree shifts on the triangle each side. ![]() Of course you won't be able to fit that in at a lot of smaller (physically) clubs... Edited by JimC |
|
![]() |
|
ColPrice2002 ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 25 Nov 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 222 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi, Given that on our inland water there always a slight variability in wind direction, I prefer the line to have a slight port bias - this gives a little more thought to the starting process. Colin |
|
![]() |
|
jeffers ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
At Hunts we try to encourage a course that has 2 good beats (at slightly different angles to try and take the shifty wind in to account. 2 good reaches (1 tight, 1 broad) and a run. That way we get fair racing for all classes. Unfortuntely as with any amateur run club some ROs are better than others and we end up with a lot of fetches and reaches which favour certain classes of boat. What is good though is that the sailors who are at the front of the fleet normally get together and have a chat and propose a better course to the RO during the lunch break. it is of course up to the RO if he decides to listen! |
|
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
|
![]() |
|
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks guys, Good stuff and I'm making notes. So how many clubs race courses have runs that are that accurate? ....and of course some course shapes seem to be dictated by what boat the OOD sails. Think I'll get some cotton "wands" made up and stick them in the ribs. Edit...Gordon and Jim, what you say makes good sense.....but what lengths would you personaly go to in a club race to achieve the "W" upwind and a square run down wind?
Edited by GK.LaserII |
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, I agree that the run is probably more critical than the beat these days, especially in mixed fleets... Consider: if the run is square downwind gybing boats might easily be sailing 50% more distance than say a Laser. If the run is maybe 10 degrees out its (finger in the air guess) going to be perhaps a little as 10% more. OTOH to my mind in most circumstances 10 degrees out of the beat makes far less difference. |
|
![]() |
|
gordon ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Sep 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1037 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Eitheryou're attached to the sea bed, in which case you are measuring the true wind, or you're not in which case you are measuring what I have heard described as the "sailor's wind".
Line should be square to sailor's wind, beat should be set downtide (looking up the beat) of the sailor's wind and run downtide (looking down the run) of sailor's wind. The ideal course in a cross current is thus a W walking the course downtide. For most racing getting the run more or less right will give the best racing (especially in the "downhill skiing" classes). Gordon |
|
Gordon
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Absolutely....but there are ways of remaining reasonably stationary but probably not worth the hassle. |
|
![]() |
|
alstorer ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No- that would be well out of line I reckon.
|
|
-_
Al |
|
![]() |
|
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks Rick, that's seriously all I was after..... So in answer to the original question you advocate best judgement. The reason for asking, My experience of club races have been entirely at one club..I have done opens / away events etc. So I have no idea what to think on this issue, I'm just gauging others opinions. When you say roughly right, would you be happy with a windward leg that could be sailed on one tack? |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |