Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Rule 42 |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2345> |
Author | |
timeintheboat ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 01 Feb 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 615 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 27 Apr 10 at 6:12pm |
I recall a Supernova (fully battened main) a year or so a go where the was a trial with on the water judges who I think we getting in practice for something bigger and a few got pinged for trying to get the battens popped - not happy bunnies.
|
|
Like some other things - sailing is more enjoyable when you do it with someone else
|
|
![]() |
|
Hector ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Location: Otley, Yorkshire Online Status: Offline Posts: 750 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Some classes have a long top batten and that can be a reet swine to get popped. The same classes suffer from a few who apparently always need 2 or 3 or more attempts - with vigourous rolling and wafting of sail / pumping of the boom. Significant forward propulsion results - clear breach of R42 but hard to prove unless most of fleet gangs up on them - but then everyones doing it - just to different degrees. Problem area - beer is clearly best solution. |
|
Keith
29er 661 (with my daughters / nephew) 49er 688 (with Phil P) RS200 968 Vortex (occasionally) Laser 2049XX |
|
![]() |
|
alstorer ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
possibly more of a single hander problem? After all, in a double hander you have other viable options- really effective for a crew to grab the falls of the cunningham (which should be unloaded in most classes in these conditions) and give it a good sharp tug.
Still will provide a bit of a speed boost, even if you keep the rig still- after all, you're going from a sailed that stalled to one that's working you... |
|
-_
Al |
|
![]() |
|
Captain Morgan ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 03 Sep 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 211 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That wasn't me, and I wasn't there, however at that time I (in my Supernova) was nearly taken to protest at least twice for trying to pop the battens across. The CA forum had a bit of discussion about what constitutes pumping/popping back then. I too was lead to understand that one pump (soley to get the battens across) was acceptable. I could be very wrong here, but I vaguely remember the Supernova CA saying that they would allow up to 2 pumps for this purpose. I was particularly annoyed at the time when I was critisised for "pumping" as it was by a catamaran sailor... Cats seem to spend every tack pumping their mains to get their battens to pop (though the speed gain in such cases would be negligable anyway). |
|
![]() |
|
jeffers ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I used to have this problem with the Blaze when it was very light. In the end it all comes down to technique. I found a little bit of kicker and a good positive roll tack usually did the job. Someone did shout at me once and I told them to look up...they soon shut up (esp when they were doing the same in their boat which didnt have a top batten issue). |
|
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
|
![]() |
|
Jon711 ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 04 May 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 465 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You are right Paul, it is all down to technique. But if I have bad technique (And I obviously do), should I be penalised twice (Once for the bad tack/gybe and twice for the supposed pumping!) Maybe I should be asking the RYA for clarification, so that it appears in the appeals folder, and we then have a definitive answer. It does seem that rule 42 is rather woolly. I always had an issue that you could pump a sail to initiate planing, so if you are crap at pumping and failed to initialise the plane, you could be protested!!!! I obviously now found another flaw in that rule...... Do the RYA Rules Dept watch this forum? What is thier comment??. Jon |
|
![]() |
|
gordon ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Sep 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1037 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1. if you try to initiate planing but fail you have not broken rule 42
2. Rest assured, any problme we cannot solve on htis forum will end up being discussed with the "appropriate authority" - who may be a member of the Racing Rules Committee. Gordon |
|
Gordon
|
|
![]() |
|
Jon711 ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 04 May 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 465 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Gordon, Have PM'ed you Jon |
|
![]() |
|
gordon ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Sep 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1037 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Some time ago I gave this interpretation of rule 42.
"he ISAF interpretations of rule 42 define a flick as the effect caused by body movement or pulling in or releasing a sail that is so abrupt that the normal shape of the sail is changed and almost immediately returned to the original shape. When you agitate a sail to tack the top batten the sail is not returned to the original shape. Doing this once would not break rule 42.2(a). However if the action propels the boat with the effect of one stroke of a paddle you would be breaking rule 42.1" I requested confirmation from a recognised rule 42 guru - my interpretation has been confirmed. It was also stated that there is a wish to write into the rules or interpretations a specific exception to rule 42 relating to popping battens and battens stuck on forestay. In the meantime, if there is a specific and recurring issue in a class the reccomended procedure would be to write a question to the Jury/protest committee. They should then post on the official notice board an interpretation that thye should apply at the event. It sound somewhat bureaucratic, but may avoid problems. Gordon |
|
Gordon
|
|
![]() |
|
Skiffman ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 27 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 291 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think the jury have wrote something into the 49er class rules to allow
you to pump again after a manoeuvre if the battens have not fully popped. No one ever cared about you doing it but the jury did not like it when they started judging medal races and everyone was popping the battens if they had not gone! Also most of rule 42 is down to doing something repeatedly, I am sure that if you rolled and pumped the boat flat 3 or 4 times in a row and they still did not pop you would be in trouble. Most of the problem is that some juries do just not understand how to sail the boats. They even tried getting rid of rule 42 in over 7 knots in the 49er like the finn, 470 etc. Would like to seem someone pump a 49er in over 7 knots and make it go faster... |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2345> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |