Measurement Based Handicapping |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 7> |
| Author | |||
Daniel Holman
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 Nov 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 997 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Measurement Based HandicappingPosted: 14 May 09 at 2:21pm |
||
|
Oh yeah, you're possibly sick of the project now, well into post dissertation drunken abandon but how much info do you need to run some numbers on a boat?
I'd be interested to get an idea on mine, and have every measurement imaginable. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Isis
Really should get out more
Joined: 01 Sep 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2753 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 May 09 at 2:43pm |
||
Nope, crew weight and height is factored in. For the time being ive taken the middle of the suggested weight range for each class and left height as a constant. Obviously how this would actualy be imlemented if the system was ever used is a pretty big sticking point and one of the 2 main problems I can see if a similar system was ever used. (The other big problem would be how development and even some of the more open one design classes are handled... What would happen if people started optimising towards the rule rather than towards winning class events?)
Its a VPP based rule as opposed to a formula - Pretty similar in principle to the IMS (or ORCi as its known know) rule from the keelboat world. Edit: VPP = Velocity Prediction Program The program takes 20 values describing the hull shape (and a few more describing rig, foils, and crew) and creates a representative model of the boat - It then balances the aerodynamic and hydrodynamic forces for a range of wind speeds and angles and the resulting speeds give you a pretty good view of the overall performance. The handicap then comes from these performance figures based on the course type and wind speed you choose.
Dan, thanks again for the stuff you sent me - It was definantly interesting to have a look through but I didnt actualy use any of it in the end having gone down a different route to yours. If you want to have a chat about what I come up with then send me another email. Edited by Isis |
|||
![]() |
|||
Rupert
Really should get out more
Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 May 09 at 2:20pm |
||
|
Surely the effects of crew weight and height are going to change not only per boat type, but for wind strength, variability and the point of sailing one is on. I can't see how anything with that many variables is ever going to get beyond being effectively guess work.
|
|||
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Daniel Holman
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 Nov 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 997 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 May 09 at 10:31am |
||
|
Isis, Did you find much use for the stuff I sent over last year? Good to hear you're happy with the outcome, lets hope it gets some good loving from the examiner! That had parameters involving the RM of the crew, assuming a crew weight / height pertaining to each boat. I also sent them to Bas in january post BM but this went unacknowledged. Edited by Daniel Holman |
|||
![]() |
|||
alstorer
Really should get out more
Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 May 09 at 10:21am |
||
please no! I've escaped that ritual humiliation since shifting to a non-weight equalised class. |
|||
|
-_
Al |
|||
![]() |
|||
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 May 09 at 10:17am |
||
|
Hi Isis, Any more details on how your system works, what the formula is etc? I'm sure I'm not the only one that is interested. |
|||
![]() |
|||
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 May 09 at 10:10am |
||
Only if we want to go insane... As various failed attempts to do performance equalisation proved its a very complex factor... |
|||
![]() |
|||
Bas Edmonds
Newbie
Joined: 20 Jan 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 26 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 May 09 at 9:16am |
||
|
Havent we forgotten the righting moment acheived by the crew? Should we not be looking at weighing crews before every event and factoring that into the equation?
|
|||
|
Bas Edmonds
RYA Technical |
|||
![]() |
|||
Isis
Really should get out more
Joined: 01 Sep 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2753 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 09 at 10:24pm |
||
|
Hi All
Just a quick note to say thankyou to those who responded to the original post. The dissertation goes in on Wednesday so im just putting the finishing touches on it now... For those interested this is a comparison between my single number handicap and PY for a handfull of classes. (Il be running a few more if I can find measurement data in time) Given the huge amount of bodging required to get something like this to work I think this has been a pretty big success and definantly shows some potential for the future... Ive stil not been able to put my finger on why that DAMN GP14 is so fast... |
|||
![]() |
|||
DiscoBall
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 03 Jan 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 305 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Dec 08 at 4:43pm |
||
Yeah I think that's down the right road - however sailings' complexity does - even in class racing - leave a lot of hidey holes for people to lurk in denial... If anything sailing probably loses more people who never master the basic racing skills having got lost up the 'boat fiddling' street. If sailing had something similar to the golf professionals in clubs then maybe it would be able to guide people to focus on relevant areas and allow them to get more out of their racing. Golf doesn't seem to suffer from its handicapping - it seems bizarrely more and more popular with younger and younger people going by my colleagues in various jobs. Weird.As for the scientific vs empirical handicapping (apologies I'm probably repeating points already made - only skim read it) - well big boat racing went through 15odd painful years mucking about with IMS. Loads of money was poured into the project and now its back at a single number IRC rating with every dog having its day. Good luck with the project but I think you'll end up reinventing the wheel! |
|||
![]() |
|||
Post Reply
|
Page 123 7> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |