New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: National/Regional Circuits.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

National/Regional Circuits.

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 11>
Author
turnturtle View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 05 Dec 14
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2538
Post Options Post Options   Quote turnturtle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: National/Regional Circuits.
    Posted: 15 Nov 16 at 12:21pm
Originally posted by Sam.Spoons

BTW I'm surprised the Aero has achieved international status so quickly, I seem to remember it used to take good a few years before a class was considered established enough to warrant such an honour.

i dunno how the RS Aero Class applied.... I'd imagine it's a consolidation of all three rigs under one class, but it got it a year ago regardless.  

 It's a hell of an achievement considering the sector of the market it's pitched at:

Back to Top
Sam.Spoons View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 07 Mar 12
Location: Manchester UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3401
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sam.Spoons Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 16 at 12:18pm
I don't know what control the IYRU/ISAF/WS (or whatever it's called this week Wink ) has over the individual classes. Certainly the national CA used to be able make it's own rules for domestic events (I recall the Enterprise being raced with a spinnaker, in Australia IIRC, while that was not allowed at international events or in the UK) Not sure if that is still the case. BTW I'm surprised the Aero has achieved international status so quickly, I seem to remember it used to take good a few years before a class was considered established enough to warrant such an honour.
Back to Top
turnturtle View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 05 Dec 14
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2538
Post Options Post Options   Quote turnturtle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 16 at 10:43am
Originally posted by Sam.Spoons

If they want to sail class event as one class that's up to the CA to decide.

you'd like to think so, I rather like the idea of owners groups over formal 'class associations', but as in International Class sucking from the teat of establishment sailing, doesn't World Sailing (ISAF) actually have the jurisdiction here?
Back to Top
Sam.Spoons View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 07 Mar 12
Location: Manchester UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3401
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sam.Spoons Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 16 at 10:37am
I'm sure it's not as simple as rig size, as I mentioned earlier hull volume and rocker must be at least as big a factor as the size of the sail when it comes to weight carrying e.g. a Phantom rig is never going to turn a Streaker into a heavyweight's boat. 

FWIW the Aero has three PY numbers on the current list and I'm sure most if not all clubs will treat them as three classes. If they want to sail class event as one class that's up to the CA to decide.
Back to Top
Rupert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 04
Location: Whitefriars sc
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8956
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rupert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 16 at 10:24am
RB, the above would suggest that the Aero is a little small for you in general, not just if rig swapping is going on.

Not sure why I'm defending rig swapping so much. Ideally, I'd like to see them as 3 separate classes, racing together, or with 3 starts, depending on numbers, people choosing which group they want to be in for the season of racing. If the wind drops or increases, then by all means swap rigs and join another group for the weekend, rather than sit on the shore, but accept you results won't count to the series in the group you normally sail with. This is a consequence of your choice, freely made.

Otherwise, the CA really needs to push the rig swapping aspect of the class, as it would be a USP. One boat, one handicap. Personally, from what I've seen of the 3 rigs racing together, I think it would kill the 5 stone dead apart from as a storm rig. A light person changing down to a 5 earlier than a middleweight will likely get beaten soundly. 7 and 9 appear to be better matched, as the 9 appears to fall over easily. This is based on the half dozen or so we have at Whitefriars so not objective!
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
Back to Top
rb_stretch View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 23 Aug 10
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 742
Post Options Post Options   Quote rb_stretch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 16 at 10:03am
It feels like I'm stretching the point a bit which I don't mean to.

Personally I'm always going to be a heavyweight, even if I slimmed down even more, so I know my place is in a Phantom or a Finn and I'm perfectly happy with that.

My observations simply came from watching the Aeros in our club, where rig swapping to a bigger sail in light winds, seemed to be quite normal. If I was to get into an Aero, I would be using the 9 rig in pretty much all conditions, so those people rig swapping would obviously have a distinct advantage and that hypothetical situation is what I was commenting on, prompted by Jeffers comment.

I don't know if this is deliberate, but now we are starting go get a fleet together the rig swapping is not happening as much. I see this as good thing, as it avoids the point above and the arms race that means everyone needs multiple rigs to be competitive.
Back to Top
Rupert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 04
Location: Whitefriars sc
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8956
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rupert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 16 at 7:47am
Originally posted by JimC

Originally posted by Chris 249


Originally posted by Rupert

A lower wind limit. Only ever suggested by people unable to concentrate on picking up ultra light gusts and shifts.
lower wind limits have also been suggested by people who see that the future of the sport is all about spectacular high-speed sailing in ideal conditions.

There's also the practical point that if tidal stream strength is approaching wind strength then navigation is more or less impossible - and there may be other considerations. If, for instance, your racing fleet has to cross a chain ferry then you do not want to be sailing in conditions where its impossible to get out of the way.
But ultimately the object of the exercise is to have fun. If a fleet/club decides that racing below a given wind strength is not fun, and they'd rather be telling tall tales over a beer in the dinghy park, well, who are we to argue? I can recall a fair few occasions when a fleet cheered when the abandon flag went up, but not any when they sighed or booed...


What you are describing is a PRO making a decision based on local conditions as to whether racing is practical. This happens everywhere already, usually after a discussion with whoever is in charge of the event from a class point of view. It may be that with your strong tide in one venue, a class minimum of 4 knots, say, would still have them going backwards, whereas on a small puddle a zephyr or 2 a would see a nice, if knee aching, tactical battle, and the 4 knot mind would ruin that.
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
Back to Top
Chris 249 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2041
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chris 249 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Nov 16 at 11:43pm
Originally posted by JimC

Originally posted by Chris 249


Originally posted by Rupert

A lower wind limit. Only ever suggested by people unable to concentrate on picking up ultra light gusts and shifts.
lower wind limits have also been suggested by people who see that the future of the sport is all about spectacular high-speed sailing in ideal conditions.

There's also the practical point that if tidal stream strength is approaching wind strength then navigation is more or less impossible - and there may be other considerations. If, for instance, your racing fleet has to cross a chain ferry then you do not want to be sailing in conditions where its impossible to get out of the way.
But ultimately the object of the exercise is to have fun. If a fleet/club decides that racing below a given wind strength is not fun, and they'd rather be telling tall tales over a beer in the dinghy park, well, who are we to argue? I can recall a fair few occasions when a fleet cheered when the abandon flag went up, but not any when they sighed or booed...

Completely valid points, both of them. The "but" is that experience seems to say that if a class are deciding whether to have a higher wind minimum, then they should accept that years of experience indicates that it appears to hurt class numbers. 

sailcraftblog.wordpress.com

The history and design of the racing dinghy.
Back to Top
Sam.Spoons View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 07 Mar 12
Location: Manchester UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3401
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sam.Spoons Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Nov 16 at 11:08pm
Originally posted by zippyRN

Originally posted by rb_stretch

Originally posted by Rupert



But heavier sailors can switch to the bigger the earlier than lighter sailors as the wind drops.


And as the wind gets lighter, the lightweights can also have the big rig. Most heavy sailors will need the biggest rig in up to 20 knots. Below that lighter sailors can start changing up as well. Most sailing conditions mean that the big sailor is only ever using the one rig. Hence they don't get the advantage of multi rigs.



 that's the issue  ... 

someone who is  fit enough and  has good enough technique can hold onto the  same rig as  the 'fatties' even if they are a stone or two underweight   and   any losses  upwind  are made back off the wind 

True but the fitness/strength/power to weight issue is separate matter, a fit small guy will beat an unfair one as a fit big guy will beat an unfit big guy, sailing skill being equal. The extra fitness allows the sailor to make better use of his weight when it's windy and be more agile around the boat when it isn't, win win. 

IMHO multiple rigs are not the issue, you might as well ban boats that suit lightweights because if a heavyweight tries to race one he's at a disadvantage. If it bothers you and you are a larger gent then buy a boat that suits your physique or go on a diet (big skinny guys win out both ways). The handicap's will work themselves out in a couple of years and if the Aero settles on one class with three rigs or a single multi rig class it will be reflected in the returns.
Back to Top
zippyRN View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 14 Sep 06
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 437
Post Options Post Options   Quote zippyRN Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Nov 16 at 10:13pm
Originally posted by jeffers

Originally posted by Sam.Spoons

#JohnJack, Obviously doable but pretty complex to get working reliably I'd have thought? And pretty much all dinghies have the facility to de-power with rake, just not on the water (or at least during a race). And it's probab;y less effective than same as changing for a significantly smaller (or larger) sail (especially as you have the same rake adjustments available with the smaller sail).


I believe the single string rake is now pretty mature in terms of development. The Merlins did it first IIRC and other classes that allow on the water raking have followed.

such is the nature of the beast  -  and why the N12 and the MR  are  the basis of  a good number of derivative  ODs    (Lark, RS200, RS400 to name just three off the top of the head  never  mind the   stem / forefoot design to maximise lwl and  basic hull forms)


Edited by zippyRN - 14 Nov 16 at 10:14pm
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 11>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy