Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Tacking onto starboard at the windward mark |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Author | ||
Jack Sparrow ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2965 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 12 Aug 15 at 4:42pm |
|
A bit of both really. The rules need to be simplified. The fact that there are X number of pages debating a single situation shows the situation is overly complex and is symbolic, in my view of the reasons there is low up take of sailing. It's true that a lot of the old guard like it that way. But the old guard die. If people want sailing to continue as a meaningful SPORT it needs youth. The Americas Cup is doing a good job of effectively simplifying and creating understanding with the technology being employed. The concept of 'understandability' they have used to make the AC meaningful to crowds needs to be employed in our rule set. And yes, rule intimidation, swearing and boat bullying needs to be got rid of. Unfortunately it is sort of embodied in the sail rules through the concept of 'protest'. Which creates an aggressive mind set not to dissimilar to two barristers playing chess. A lot of old guard sailors like this sort of sailing. And enjoy drifting around a tree surrounded gravel pit at 1 knot, having a mental battle with an club adversary. I've yet to see a teenager get much out of this type of sailing. That's not to say it shouldn't exist. Just maybe they that enjoy that sort of sailing should 'team race' with the current set of rules. And let those interested in SPORT ( in the athletic sense ) and not 3D CHESS, sail with a rule set that is focused more on getting around the course as cleanly and swiftly as possible. Maybe there should be two very distinct rule sets? RULES LIGHT and RULES HEAVY after all most classes have an Inland Championships as well as there regular Champs etc... JimC - as for drugs, I'd be careful about pointing the finger at other sports with the inference being that Sailing is clean. |
||
![]() |
||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Unlike society as a whole, I'd say there has been a reduction in the use of bad language in sailing over the past 30 years, and it is now more frowned upon. It may just be where I sail, of course, or even just the utterances from my mouth that have changed, of course!
|
||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I don't know if JS is complaining about port and starboard near windward marks or foul and abusive language and rule 69/2. If it's about port/starboard, then I think Rupert's got it covered. About, foul language and abuse, there may be a point. When I was involved in swimming and orienteering, it would have been just unthinkable for a competitor to cop an earful, either during a race (a bit difficult with swimming) or around an event venue. I think that's probably the same for any participation sport like golf, or indeed, aths or cycling. It may be different where the marketing department has promoted a 'bad-boy' image with trash talking and sledging as in basketball and cricket. Sure aths an cycling have drug problems, but I suspect that drug problems, appearing at the elite level, don't deter families from participation, while an image involving foul mouthed bad manners might.
|
||
![]() |
||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
We get ourselves into complex situations, so we need a complex set of rules. When setting a race for beginners in Funboats, I remove all but the don't crash rule, and ignore that, too. Works for them, wouldn't work for those who want to take it more seriously.
|
||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6661 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Compared to the problems, say, athletics and cycling have got I'll take ours thanks...
|
||
![]() |
||
Jack Sparrow ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2965 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
not at all, carry on. It's a legitimate set of questions after all. Heavens knows, maybe the process will encourage a generation of yet unknown sailors to take up a sport riddled with such contentious rules. Or just maybe, ISAF will do some editing.
|
||
![]() |
||
Wobble ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 26 Jul 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 44 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
So we can take it you would prefer that we confine ourselves to discussion of non-contentious aspects of the rules of our sport? Perhaps we should accentuate the positives, N. Korean-style. I should like to wax lyrical about the draw of the sea and of sailing, but of course someone more articulate got there before me ... Do you think that would help challenge the mighty XBox? ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Jack Sparrow ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2965 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I'm surprised anyone is debating the reasons for - 'the decline in club sailing' - on another thread on here, after reading this thread. You have gentlemen, described in a few posts why people don't want to take up sailing as a sport.
|
||
![]() |
||
Wobble ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 26 Jul 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 44 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Never came across a Rule 69, actual or threatened, in RL.
Actually, I was super-polite - surely a signing of my growing old. I left out anything that could be construed as abusive, though I also omitted the word 'protest', which overall I think was a mistake in view of the discussion. |
||
![]() |
||
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
That would be for a breach of rule 10, on the water?
Threat to go rule 69 when? probably not at the time of the port/starboard incident. Two incidents.
Collisions causally linked?:
I don't think that is going to get you there. Edited by Brass - 11 Aug 15 at 11:58am |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |