| Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
| Bruce Roberts classic 45 Valencia, Spain |
![]() |
| Free mast for Merlin Rocket - has a bend! Guildford |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Inner & Outer distance marks |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |||
alstorer
Really should get out more
Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Inner & Outer distance marksPosted: 24 Jun 14 at 4:25pm |
||
|
ouch! Shows the problem with unintended consequences of re-writing rules!
Also highlights an issue with using (kindly lent) private yachts for committee boats. Dedicated committee boats will generally be far less worried about the odd "ding" arising from someone miscalculating. |
|||
|
-_
Al |
|||
![]() |
|||
Brass
Really should get out more
Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Jun 14 at 11:43pm |
||
Rule 86.1( a ) lists the rules that SI CANNOT change. SI can change anything in Part 5 Protests etc except rule 69 and rules 70 and 71 Appeals. So your SI can rewrite the whole protest and penalisation process if you are silly enough. Providing for DNE without a hearing, I agree may be unwise and unfair. Interesting if the SI 'deem' the space between the RC vessel and the distance mark to be non-navigable. You then have a starting mark (the RC Vessel) or possibly two starting marks (the RC Vessel and the distance mark) NOT surrounded by navigable water, so rules 18, 19, and 20 apply, in their entirety to the starting marks when boats are approaching them to start (Preamble to Section C). That is, they have just re-introduced the Pro-Barging Rule.
Edited by Brass - 23 Jun 14 at 11:49pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
jeffers
Really should get out more
Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Jun 14 at 3:37pm |
||
I have seen this at the Scorpion Nationals. Stated that between the IDM and the committee boat was deemd non-navigable and any boat entering this was expected to retire immediately or would be given a DNE. Didn't prevent a lot of push and shoving at the end of the line though!.
|
|||
|
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
|||
![]() |
|||
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Jun 14 at 2:15pm |
||
|
I think we'd need to see the exact wording, but I'm sure I've seen legit SIs that provide for DSQ without a hearing.
Whether its wise or fair might be another discussion! Edited by JimC - 23 Jun 14 at 2:20pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
alstorer
Really should get out more
Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Jun 14 at 1:36pm |
||
|
A recent event I was at had no IDM but did have in the SIs that touching the committee boat would be grounds for instant disqualification with no hearing.
Is this SI compliant with the RRS? |
|||
|
-_
Al |
|||
![]() |
|||
gordon
Really should get out more
Joined: 07 Sep 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1037 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Jun 14 at 8:25am |
||
|
The problem does not usually arise when boats are approaching the line to startas they have to pass both committee boat and inner limit mark on the same side. As the inner limit mark is a starting mark the RC will consider any boat passing the wrong side of the inner limit mark as DNS
Should the race committee wish to prevent boats coming between the mark and the committee boat at other times then they can add an additional SI. However, they would have to protest any boats that break the SI you propose - which I find race officers are often reluctant to do. |
|||
|
Gordon
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Brass
Really should get out more
Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jun 14 at 11:31pm |
||
Does it help to add 'Boats shall not pass between the mark and the committee vessel'?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
gordon
Really should get out more
Joined: 07 Sep 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1037 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jun 14 at 4:43pm |
||
|
The RYA reccomend the following SI:
'When a buoy is laid near the committee boat it is a starting limit mark that shall be left on the same side as the nearby committee boat.' This means that the buoy is a mark as defined in RRS. |
|||
|
Gordon
|
|||
![]() |
|||
andymck
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 15 Dec 06 Location: Stamford Online Status: Offline Posts: 397 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Jun 14 at 3:29pm |
||
|
Brass gets there again. 2 boat length example, I have used to my advantage before. I have only ever seen this as an issue on a shore based start. On a committee boat a rope as described puts people off, but have seen the blue and cyan examples pulled off
Andy. |
|||
|
Andy Mck
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Brass
Really should get out more
Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Jun 14 at 3:19pm |
||
|
Sorry, I can't visualise the situation described on the mythical front page. Here are some relevant references. Race Management Manual
RYA Appeal 2004/9
Q&A 2010-033 (Lapsed)
Edited by Brass - 21 Jun 14 at 10:55am |
|||
![]() |
|||
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |