New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Pondicaps...ffs.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Pondicaps...ffs.

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Medway Maniac View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 13 May 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2788
Post Options Post Options   Quote Medway Maniac Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Pondicaps...ffs.
    Posted: 01 May 14 at 3:17pm
http://www.sailwave.com/

Yes PC, or Linux for the cognoscenti.

Everyone has gripes over it, but until we get something better it does a pretty good job, and it's free (though WSC made donation).
Back to Top
iGRF View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 07 Mar 11
Location: Hythe
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6499
Post Options Post Options   Quote iGRF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 14 at 3:04pm
Originally posted by GybeFunny



Wouldnt your fixed measurement system have spat out a new number for you when you bought that new sail or you re-routed your mainsheet, increased purchase on the kicker, moved the racks more inboard, etc? Therefore it wouldnt have stayed like it was when you first turned up.


Well if the beam/righting moment were part of the data input required then yes it would give a different number, for the rack movement or sail, my racks are fixed now on the innermost position thanks to the storms blowing the boat off the trailer and bending some bit that probably shouldn't be bent.

But, that programme MM has put up there, that I need, trouble is I'm all mac, and it's a piece of godawful PC software by the look of it, I wonder if that's what they were using, I honestly don't normally bother to even look at results down there til the following week to see how bad/much I've got to improve.
I did actually enter temporary crap mode and got unsynched from the shifts so in my mind I didn't deserve to win, but then he made a fundamental error, taking the tack furthest away from the mark whilst I took the right one, then God sent me a beaut of a header, which gave me an instant 20 boat length cover, then instead of waiting me out he tacked first and let me stay behind and inside him so the next shift gave me another ten boat lengths and order was fully restored...Prior to that he'd gotten in front of me so the result should have been tighter and I would have expected to be beaten on handicap, so my guilt was doubled, I don't wake up screaming in the night about it, but I'm not comfortable, to the point here I am confessing my sins...

PS, just stop taking coastal returns altogether and leave us with the PN's as of 2007, it was fine then.

Edited by iGRF - 01 May 14 at 3:08pm
Back to Top
GybeFunny View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 27 Oct 09
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 403
Post Options Post Options   Quote GybeFunny Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 14 at 2:30pm
Originally posted by iGRF


Yes yes yes I know all that, precisely why I think the system is screwed, I'd rather they had just left it as it was when I first turned up, at least I could have a fixed measure as to my performance, 40 points on here, 10 points off there, that's no sport, exactly the reason to adopt a fixed measured system. I don't want my performance artificially assisted any more than I want it reduced, I'm trying to learn how to do this thing, how can I do that all the time they're shifting the bloody goal posts all over the place?

Wouldnt your fixed measurement system have spat out a new number for you when you bought that new sail or you re-routed your mainsheet, increased purchase on the kicker, moved the racks more inboard, etc? Therefore it wouldnt have stayed like it was when you first turned up.
Back to Top
Medway Maniac View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 13 May 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2788
Post Options Post Options   Quote Medway Maniac Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 14 at 1:44pm
As usual - either him or the other good, Hartley Wayfarer sailor.  

I reckon - and they don't disagree that they should be on 1080 (*).  But it would be pointless because
a) they would probably still win a lot
b) their clubmates would still moan the PY was too generous.

* for years the Wayfarer was on 1099, then they added slot gaskets, which the builder said were worth about 1% more speed, now we have the new, unquestionably-faster-in-most-conditions Hartleys...
Back to Top
Rupert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 04
Location: Whitefriars sc
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8956
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rupert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 14 at 1:36pm
Blimey, that Wayfarer absolutely hammered the rest of the fleet!

And yes, the first para does exactly that - why an adjustment is made will be lost in amongst the noise and confusion.


Edited by Rupert - 01 May 14 at 1:39pm
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
Back to Top
Medway Maniac View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 13 May 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2788
Post Options Post Options   Quote Medway Maniac Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 14 at 1:29pm
Spot on second paragraph, Rupert.  Your first just illustrates the subjectivity and frustration that local PY adjustments often imply.

The current version of Sailwave gives the option of including a BCR number in the published results, which is basically the number that a boat would have needed to finish joint first.  

I love including it if for no other reason than to cow those members who bang on about how they would be winning if it weren't for the latest round of RYA PY changes.  Here's an example from last Sunday's (F3-4, largely windward-leeward Medium Fleet race:


Back to Top
Rupert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 04
Location: Whitefriars sc
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8956
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rupert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 14 at 1:14pm
Maybe that isn't what they thought - maybe they thought that the boat is better on more open water, and that your skills are already equal to those you are racing against, so the handicap should be adjusted to suit the boat on that particular puddle so the person with the best race form on the day wins.

I quite agree about the problems of small clubs adjusting handicaps, by the way - there is always some grumpy bugger who will take it the wrong way... sailing clubs abound with them. Can't agree the answer is a measurement system, though - simply too many variables for it ever to be even half as accurate as a yardstick system. I'm looking forward to a time where we have enough returns to be able separate proper sailing from that stuff people do on the sea, which buggers up our nice small lake numbers...
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
Back to Top
iGRF View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 07 Mar 11
Location: Hythe
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6499
Post Options Post Options   Quote iGRF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 14 at 12:54pm
Originally posted by kneewrecker

So you are advocating that your local club should not adjust the handicap?


I've said this all along, for this very reason, why put them in the position where they quite plainly piss off their membership, it might appear to help some whilst it irritates others.

What is required clearly is a fixed boat rating system and a volunteer handicap according to local skill/conditions applied, but the boat system must be accurate and maths based, not buffer on the end of a wet bit of string..

I'm happy that I'm not good enough to sail my boat to its handicap, so I keep trying harder with the hope that one day... But I'm not happy 'they' think oh that muppet needs a bit of help lets bung him up to 1062..

Edited by iGRF - 01 May 14 at 12:56pm
Back to Top
kneewrecker View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 09 Apr 14
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1586
Post Options Post Options   Quote kneewrecker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 14 at 10:12am
So you are advocating that your local club should not adjust the handicap?
Back to Top
iGRF View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 07 Mar 11
Location: Hythe
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6499
Post Options Post Options   Quote iGRF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 14 at 9:04am
Originally posted by Rupert

Pat, I think you'll find there is a much more complicated way of working out who won if there are different numbers of laps...Grumph, you have been complaining for years about the Miracle handicap. All they have done is change the handicaps of other boats relative to it in order to reflect the performance of those boats on a tiny puddle. Isn't that what you wanted? It could be that they have over adjusted, and maybe not allowed for enough (lack of) crew skill factor, but what they are doing is what the RYA want clubs to do, isn't it? It may be that they will cut your handicap back a little after a while once they see what results are coming in, and you appear to be too favoured now. You could even suggest they knock 10 points off. What they are doing is difficult with only a few returns, but at least they are trying to get fair racing.Remember, a PY isn't a fixed thing - it isn't "how fast my boat goes", so sailing off a different one may well reflect the potential of the boat better than the one in the lists for that stretch of water.



Yes yes yes I know all that, precisely why I think the system is screwed, I'd rather they had just left it as it was when I first turned up, at least I could have a fixed measure as to my performance, 40 points on here, 10 points off there, that's no sport, exactly the reason to adopt a fixed measured system. I don't want my performance artificially assisted any more than I want it reduced, I'm trying to learn how to do this thing, how can I do that all the time they're shifting the bloody goal posts all over the place?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy