New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Mx next
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Mx next

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 9>
Author
Nipper View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 13
Location: Hants
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 40
Post Options Post Options   Quote Nipper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Mx next
    Posted: 08 Nov 13 at 1:40pm
Originally posted by pondmonkey

it was a poor imitator then... we tested the 302 at our club around the time we were mincing around in 420s, they were awful little boats, windsurfer influenced toestraps, crappy little kite, foils that snapped when you capsized.  

I remember the guy saying they were like 'Mx Rays' but for kids, jumping on the kite-bandwaggon no doubt... a poor comparison.
I had forgotten about the Concept 302, it was worse than awful.
 
The agent came to our club one Saturday with 4 of them as demonstrators. I think we broke something on all of them.
 
On the one I had, the daggerboard snapped of when sailing to windward, if you can call sailing at 70 degrees to the wind "sailing to windward".
 
Actually the concept was not that bad (different size sails, genneker) but they forgot to employ someone who knew anything about dinghy design and construction.
 
 
 
39 years of dinghy racing and still waiting to peak.
Back to Top
Nipper View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 13
Location: Hants
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 40
Post Options Post Options   Quote Nipper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Nov 13 at 1:18pm
Originally posted by Rupert

Just been watching the video of the 27 foot version on SA. Seems to make a bit more sense when blown up in scale... Still seems to be sailed on its ear, to get the canting keel clear of the water.
Proably better to say " Still seems to be sailing like a pigs ear"
 
Any boat where the designer publically says his design is "unique, innovative, and sexy looking" you know is going to be a canine of the first order.
Whether you blow it up or scale it down, the MX design concept is just somebody trying to be different with no boat design skills. - Fazisi, its baby brother the MX Ray, MX Next  look like fast boats to a 10 year old + they have an aversion to freeboard.
 
The 27 ft SpeedDream video just seems to re-inforce the old saying about being a race yacht owner - tearing up money whilst having a cold shower.... (Can only assume Mike Golding was on a good retainer and still had his Southern Ocean oilskins available for a force 3 trip around the Solent)
39 years of dinghy racing and still waiting to peak.
Back to Top
Rupert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 04
Location: Whitefriars sc
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8956
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rupert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Nov 13 at 3:33pm
Just been watching the video of the 27 foot version on SA. Seems to make a bit more sense when blown up in scale... Still seems to be sailed on its ear, to get the canting keel clear of the water.
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
Back to Top
yellowwelly View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 24 May 13
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2003
Post Options Post Options   Quote yellowwelly Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Nov 13 at 3:19pm
so they've sold 5 in Annapolis apparently... anyone know of a UK punter taking the plunge?  (down the mine references intended)
Back to Top
haroosh View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 14 Jan 09
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 521
Post Options Post Options   Quote haroosh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Jun 13 at 12:49pm
Ah fair enough. Didn't look back. Too busy keeping up with all the 100 owners post tennis!!!
Keith
RS100 GBR 116 (XLR8)
Back to Top
getafix View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 28 Mar 06
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2143
Post Options Post Options   Quote getafix Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Jun 13 at 5:40pm
Originally posted by haroosh

Just watched the video and it seems quite funny to me that while loads of folks are trying to design boats to rise above the waves this boat is looking like its going to go through and under the waves!!!
The video makes it look very nose happy and indeed makes the 300 look positively buoyant in the bow.
Just not convinced about wave piercing in a small single handed craft. Does it come supplied with a snorkel set?


I would like to refer the honorable poster to a couple of pages earlier in this thread  Wink
Back to Top
haroosh View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 14 Jan 09
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 521
Post Options Post Options   Quote haroosh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Jun 13 at 5:30pm
Just watched the video and it seems quite funny to me that while loads of folks are trying to design boats to rise above the waves this boat is looking like its going to go through and under the waves!!!
The video makes it look very nose happy and indeed makes the 300 look positively buoyant in the bow.
Just not convinced about wave piercing in a small single handed craft. Does it come supplied with a snorkel set?

Keith
RS100 GBR 116 (XLR8)
Back to Top
Jack Sparrow View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 08 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2965
Post Options Post Options   Quote Jack Sparrow Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Jun 13 at 1:07pm
Just to make my self clear... I'm not talking about any deceleration, and that inertia affecting the mast. Im talking about the fact that the foot, kite tack and possible first third of the kite* will be submerge, potentially repeatedly, when wave piercing on a downwind leg. With the resultant repeated inversion force applied to the mast.

*the drag of the kite being submerged may add the undesirable deceleration
Back to Top
Daniel Holman View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 17 Nov 08
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 997
Post Options Post Options   Quote Daniel Holman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Jun 13 at 12:51pm
Originally posted by tgruitt

Originally posted by Daniel Holman

I suspect that as long as it is made well, more towards the small diameter/thick wall and if 2 part the join is good, that the mast will be fine with kite up and bow burying.


Surely having shrouds and a forestay would do a better job?


A different job. A properly engineered unstayed rig will have in the order of 3 x the thickness at the base of the mast when compared to an equivalent stayed mast. That means somewhere near 20 x the inertia, so whilst the deflection at the tip with respect to its undeflected position may be greater, the stress may very well be lower.

When you load up the stayed stick you put compression into it too, which is sometimes a problem with skinny walls.

People need to get their heads around the differences between the deflections of, and stresses experienced by, unstayed masts.

The burying of the bow gives rise to an acceleration, which is what magnifies the static forces. TBH the fine bow will bury more progressively and give rise to lesser load spikes I would have thought.
Going down the mine is probably not a lot differnet to big bearaways or running aground, all events which will have associated acclelrations and load/stress spikes.

Back to Top
Jack Sparrow View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 08 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2965
Post Options Post Options   Quote Jack Sparrow Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Jun 13 at 11:32am
to be fair Andy, the rib is only backing out of the way.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 9>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy