Laser Start? |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 5> |
| Author | |
GybinJoe
Newbie
Joined: 04 May 11 Location: Ireland Online Status: Offline Posts: 17 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Laser Start?Posted: 14 May 11 at 2:05pm |
|
Heres the situation,
At a standard start line theres one boat (A) head to wind, sitting there waiting for the start whistle so she can bear away to starboard and start sailing.
As the whistle blows, Boat A bears away and starts to accelerate.
At the same time that Boat A Bears away, Boat (B) is on port tack at speed and a collision occurrs.
Boat A protests B for not keeping clear when overtaking and Boat B protests A for tacking onto his course.
Who would be penalised? This happened to me and I was Boat B, I got penalised even though I was sure i was in the right.
|
|
![]() |
|
Lukepiewalker
Really should get out more
Joined: 24 May 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1341 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 May 11 at 5:38pm |
|
It sounds to me like you were in the wrong to be honest without lots more information.
|
|
|
Ex-Finn GBR533 "Pie Hard"
Ex-National 12 3253 "Seawitch" Ex-National 12 2961 "Curved Air" Ex-Mirror 59096 "Voodoo Chile" |
|
![]() |
|
GybinJoe
Newbie
Joined: 04 May 11 Location: Ireland Online Status: Offline Posts: 17 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 May 11 at 10:10pm |
|
I would have though Boat A was at fault beacuse he had a choice on which tack to take and chose a collision course.
|
|
|
Laser Standard (Helm)
J-80 (Crew&Helm) Laser 2 (Helm) Beneteau(Crewing for multiple boats) |
|
![]() |
|
SoggyBadger
Really should get out more
Joined: 26 Oct 10 Location: The Wild Wood Online Status: Offline Posts: 552 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 May 11 at 10:33pm |
|
I have real problems with you description of the incident (maybe the protest committee did too
). If A is on starboard and B is on port then overtaking is irrelevant. Your only possible chance of winning a protest would have been to argue that A didn't give you room/opportunity to keep clear before he/she altered course.
Edited by SoggyBadger - 14 May 11 at 10:34pm |
|
|
Best wishes from deep in the woods
SB |
|
![]() |
|
GybinJoe
Newbie
Joined: 04 May 11 Location: Ireland Online Status: Offline Posts: 17 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 May 11 at 10:36pm |
|
Oop's
|
|
|
Laser Standard (Helm)
J-80 (Crew&Helm) Laser 2 (Helm) Beneteau(Crewing for multiple boats) |
|
![]() |
|
Lukepiewalker
Really should get out more
Joined: 24 May 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1341 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 May 11 at 10:40pm |
|
Right, if you were both on starboard then the other boat was windward boat and required to keep clear by the sound of it. Overtaking has nothing to do with it, you're either overlapped or you're not.
Edited by Lukepiewalker - 14 May 11 at 10:43pm |
|
|
Ex-Finn GBR533 "Pie Hard"
Ex-National 12 3253 "Seawitch" Ex-National 12 2961 "Curved Air" Ex-Mirror 59096 "Voodoo Chile" |
|
![]() |
|
Andymac
Really should get out more
Joined: 04 Apr 07 Location: Derbyshire Online Status: Offline Posts: 852 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 May 11 at 5:52am |
I agree, we need lots more information.
If as you added, you were 'also' on starboard, then I'd be inclined to put all my money on boat A being in the wrong.
Had you been on port there would still be a very good chance on boat A being in the wrong...
Note; boat A could only be considered to be 'starboard' tack if had reached 'head to wind' by luffing up from a starboard tack course. If boat A was head to wind from port, then would not have any rights until established a 'close hauled' starboard course and then only on port tack boats.
We do need to establish boat A's rights, and whether in changing course it initially gave room for 'keep clear' boats to do just that.
|
|
![]() |
|
Andymac
Really should get out more
Joined: 04 Apr 07 Location: Derbyshire Online Status: Offline Posts: 852 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 May 11 at 5:58am |
|
Oh, and if boat A was moving backwards at the time by backing its sail then again, it will have forfeited all rights.
|
|
![]() |
|
Lukepiewalker
Really should get out more
Joined: 24 May 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1341 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 May 11 at 7:27am |
|
Indeed. The other things requiring consideration are whether you could have avoided the collision, and whether you gave the other boat the opportunity to keep clear.
|
|
|
Ex-Finn GBR533 "Pie Hard"
Ex-National 12 3253 "Seawitch" Ex-National 12 2961 "Curved Air" Ex-Mirror 59096 "Voodoo Chile" |
|
![]() |
|
jeffers
Really should get out more
Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 May 11 at 8:26am |
|
I am assuming a lot here....
A is the windward boat and was sitting head to wind on the start line (why they would sit 'head to wind' I do not know, perhaps they were lying to)
B was Leeward and established an overlap at which point A must keep clear
B was sailing a close hauled course and did not alter course
However if A was stationery then B has to give A enough time to react, this does include bearing away to get the boat moving so they can keep clear (I am pretty sure there is an ISAF case that covers this).
What you have not also given are the realtive points of sail leading up to and during the incident..
|
|
|
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123 5> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |