Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
GNAV... |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 456 |
Author | |
Matt Jackson ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Sep 04 Location: Darlington Online Status: Offline Posts: 962 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 07 Feb 05 at 10:50am |
Firstly, the picture is Mark's Contender, this is mine and the kicker is atached to a flippin big u-bolt through the mast. Secondly, I might have the answer - assuming I've understood the question: When I step the mast I attach the forstay, heave the mast onto the step, and attach the looseish lowers. Then I attach the halyard to the outhaul and bang on loads of kicker which 'lengthens' the shrouds and lets me pin them in low enough to get the the rig tension I need (I'm quite big), far lower than I could manage just pulling on the trapeze handle. From this I deduce that pulling on kicker bends the mast shortening the distance between hound and chain plates and also pulls the mast back because of the control lines being lead back (nothing to do with where the cascade it attached). Edited by Matt Jackson |
|
Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
|
![]() |
|
Twin Poles ![]() Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Nov 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 33 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think Matt has given us an answer there, but i still think if the anchored point was further back the effect would be increased further as the mast rotates in the mast step as well as bending. It would also be interesting to see the extent of this when using a sail rather than a static rope, as i feel the reason this has not been documented much (well not anywhere i've seen), is because the forces will be neglilible. If my name ended in Bethwaite i might be able to investigate this with several test boats and rigs and come up with a very firm conclusion, probably with several different types of graph. Unfortunatly i dont have time, money, or expertise so i guess i'll have to leave it up guys, but if anyone does get any figues i would be interested in seeing them. |
|
![]() |
|
Matt Jackson ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Sep 04 Location: Darlington Online Status: Offline Posts: 962 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hmm, if your mast rotates in the step on a Contender you are (or soon will be) in a bit of bother. |
|
Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
|
![]() |
|
Twin Poles ![]() Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Nov 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 33 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
True, what i meant to say was attemping to rotate, i'd hope (for your sake) the forestay would stop the mast falling down. |
|
![]() |
|
Matt Jackson ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Sep 04 Location: Darlington Online Status: Offline Posts: 962 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
OK, I thought you meant rotate like a wing mast. You mean the tip rotating about the heel, backwards towards the cockpit, yeah? In which case I agree the bending force would be added to by a rotational one but we're only talking about the forestay being under more tension. Isn't that where you came in? |
|
Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
|
![]() |
|
Twin Poles ![]() Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Nov 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 33 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah that is what i meant by rotation (communications never been a good point of mine). So this "rotational" force would surley increase forestay tension, which is about where i came in, I think? |
|
![]() |
|
Matt Jackson ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Sep 04 Location: Darlington Online Status: Offline Posts: 962 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, I believe you're right. Not sure what effect that has on my particular class but the shrouds going slack is a bigger potential problem. Can't remember the process in detail but as the wind increases, and I go out on the wire, the rig depowers itself and I have to come back in - somewhat frustrating hence the high rig tension. |
|
Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Classic problem of some years ago: If spreaders are pushing inwards because they're outside the line of hounds to anchorage then when going to winwdward the windward spreader is pushing the mast down to leeward, the leeward shroud tends to go slack, doing nothing. In practice the mast stays fairly straight. If heavy crew on trapeze then the winward shroud goes slack and the leeward one is loaded, thus the leeard spreader is pushing the centre of the mast up to windward, windward spreader not doing much, rig massivel;y depowers. Thus the need for massive rig tension on modern trapeze boats. Alternative ways round it are to use diamonds rather than spreders - hence the Laser 2 and RS600 rigs - or to lock the mast solidly in place with check stays to the base of the spreaders like a lot of two spreader rigs, where the mast is held centred by the checks fighting the spreaders. This still tends to need a lot of rig tension though. BTW folks kicker can't cntribute that much to forestay tension because its working at a massive mechanical disadvantage due to the length of the levers. |
|
![]() |
|
Blobby ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 May 04 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 779 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
[/QUOTE] Yes to some extent - but you put the rig tension on a 49er with a 5:1 purchase in the boat breaker. Most kickers that work have some about 16:1 purchase - you can pull quite hard on that...plus if you are looking at hiking classes with typically low rig tension it can be significant. |
|
![]() |
|
I luv Wight ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Jan 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 628 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes to some extent - but you put the rig tension on a 49er with a 5:1 purchase in the boat breaker. Most kickers that work have some about 16:1 purchase - you can pull quite hard on that...plus if you are looking at hiking classes with typically low rig tension it can be significant. [/QUOTE]Yes but the length to the bow is 1800mm ish and the kicker distance that u have been discussing is ~ 20mmish at most. therefore 1800 x 5 = 9000 for the boat breaker and 20 x 16 = 320 for the kicker so the kicker tension is 30 times less effective! and you don't pull the kicker string any where as much as the rig tension, so this must go to more like 100 times less effective in practice - regardless of the other mast compression/bending effects etc dicussed above. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 456 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |