Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
PY adjustment for non-spin Mirror or Cadet |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Author | |
rich96 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 20 Jan 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 596 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 04 Sep 22 at 2:25pm |
To be fair you cant really compare that the effect of that horrible bolt on kite that they put on a boat that was already a handful (2 sails plus sliding seat on a single hander) to taking away a kite from say a 400 (a 2 man boat designed to have a kite originally).
The AC inevitably died. Edited by rich96 - 04 Sep 22 at 2:26pm |
|
![]() |
|
Paramedic ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 27 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 929 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The AC died out here but I believe its still going in the USA and Australia where they have the water to make it work.
But I agree with the sentiment, take the kite off a Fireball, Scorpion, Merlin, 400 or anything moderately fast that sails reaches and runs and its crippling, way more than 4%
|
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In fact the UK was the only country where the AC got much of a following. Not, in my opinion unconnected with the fact that only the UK had Rob Michael.
There's very little useful real data available for kite versus no kite, but I note in Australia the difference between an NS14 and a MG14 (same rules except for a kite on the MG) is about 2%. As a crude calculation to achieve say 10% faster round the cans on a boat that's normally say 25% faster through the water downhill than up the downhill speed needs to increase by about 40%. If we are talking about a pole kite boat that runs dead downwind such an increase is unobtainable on the run. Edited by JimC - 04 Sep 22 at 6:48pm |
|
![]() |
|
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Given that PY is an average of all wind speeds, including too light to fly properly and too strong not to swim, plus all points of sail, the advantage of the much higher speed on a perfect reach in perfect wind is heavily outweighed by other factors.
I remember a race in a 2000 where we had 2 amazing reaches where we planed, gybed, planed flat out every lap, and beat all the single handers by a country mile. Balance that against all the races where I've been soaking low and being thrashed by Lasers down the run, and I can see why on average it makes little difference. Good game, though. |
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|
![]() |
|
Paramedic ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 27 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 929 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I fully accept that a boat without a kite isn't going to get round the course at half the speed of the same boat with a kite. But unless its too light to go sailing it does make a significant difference and a symmetric most definitely gets your down a run faster than not having one, whether you sail it in two reaches or soak down.
We all strive for an extra 0.25% boatsepeed, 1% is very significant but I would suggest 10% without a kite is a decent guess for round the cans in a medium speed symmetric boat - that's 6 minutes in an hour. Obviously water size and windspeed comes into this too but I think in medium conditions on a decent course at my club i'd struggle to finish within 5 minutes of myself if I didn't use a kite - 5 minutes is probably 1/4 - 1/3 of a lap including a beat. If you're sailing an inefficient assymenteric (Slower than a 400) the more running time you have the less difference it makes.
Edited by Paramedic - 05 Sep 22 at 7:21am |
|
![]() |
|
seastate ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 23 Aug 12 Online Status: Offline Posts: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If sailing with a symmetric kite on a big course dead down wind is slower than coming up about ten degrees and gybing on the shifts. Soaking dead down wind only works on a very short leg or to do the last few metres on a big course without having to do two gybes.
Asymmetric kites will work downwind in lighter winds as long as there is room to sail where you want and gybing on the shifts, restricted waters or where there is a strong tide dictating where you go is when it fails. I don’t even sail dead down wind in my current stead ( a single handler with shrouds) as sailing a bit higher and gybing on the shifts proves to be quicker.
|
|
![]() |
|
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The speed difference around the course is anything from 'next to nothing' up to 'twice as quick down wind, so about 15 or 20% overall. If the kite means you plane and the others don't you're quids in. If it means you can overtake on a dead run, it puts you clear ahead up the next beat. Small changes in actual boat speed can sometimes be magnified by mark roundings and tactics. Other times, a significant boost in speed down the reach doesn't make up for e.g. being a boatlength behind the leader at the first mark. Sometimes in light air, not faffing with the kite is faster. I once broke the kite halyard on a 400 early in a windy race, I don't think it changed our finishing position at all. Years ago at a small inland club, we used about 2%, it worked as well as anything else.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |