Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Proper course off the start line |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Author | |||||
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 30 May 16 at 11:37am |
||||
Agree. I've said so before. Under the post 1995 rules, a leeward boat is ALWAYS entitled to luff, ALWAYS subject to rule 16, and SOMETIMES subject to rule 17.
Strongly disagree. No sooner does someone start talking about 'luffing rights' than someone mentions 'luff as she pleases', which used to be all about the aggressive hard luff, NOT about proper course.
Agree that you pretty much expressed your comments in current 'rules speak'. But IMHO if you continue discussing rules in language and concepts that were abandoned over 20 years ago, even round the bar, people will continue to be confused, as long as you do it that way.
Strongly agree.
Edited by Brass - 30 May 16 at 12:00pm |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
andymck ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 15 Dec 06 Location: Stamford Online Status: Offline Posts: 397 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
To luff, is just the correct nautical term to alter course to windward. We can of course just abandon the rich and vast English language and only use lawyer speak. But for people who still use obsolete words, it is useful to use them to clarify a concept with which they may be struggling and is entirely acceptable.
I do however, agree that when explains the rules we should aim to use the language in which they are written. But I find constantly that we end up with generations that can't communicate with each other, so using terms that they are familiar with is useful and inclusive. Edited by andymck - 30 May 16 at 1:11pm |
|||||
Andy Mck
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
piglet ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Jan 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
+1 on that one. Something I hear a lot at the club is: "There is no such thing as proper course" I apologise for bringing the term 'luff' into this thread. But you must admit it is a handy term compared with 'sail above proper course' Edited by piglet - 30 May 16 at 2:00pm |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
GML ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 24 Jul 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 94 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
But they mean two different things! "Luff" means to change course towards the wind. "Sail above her proper course" means what it says. A boat that is sailing below her proper course can luff up to her proper course (subject to rule 16) even if she is subject to rule 17. Rule 17 doesn't say you can't luff, it says that in certain circumstances you can't sail above your proper course.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
But luff doesn't just mean sail above proper course.
What I'm objecting to though, is the phrase "Luffing rights" which has long gone from the rules. A ROW boat normally has the right to change course as she pleases, to luff or bear away. That's the default state as defined by Section A. In a few situations that right is partially restricted by Section B and Section C rules. |
|||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |